Warehouse

[bradl]

[Wörn75]

^ That's going to look amazing after a wash Bradl 

[bradl]

I know, I'm pretty stoked to see how it will come out. I am just not sure when I will do it. Not sure if I want to hold out for a little while longer, or just wash now.

[Graytrain]

the rate at which you fade stuff fucking baffles me. 

 

Also cant wait to see post wash. 

[Sugar Mountain]

Anyone ordered directly from the Warehouse webstore and have experience to share? Considering a purchase...

[SLAB]

anyone have the 900 model? Looks like it fits TTS?

any Japanese shop that 'facilitates' international shipping?

[Bobbo]

I tried on a raw (TTS) pair at Caliroots a couple of months ago and it would probably end up very well after a wash. Should be a pic or two somewhere in this thread.

[Flash]

Definitely tts , I tried on a 29 (sd1) in Tokyo and they were super tight .... the 30 was better but still a little on the small size

[pomata]

is the 900 more tapered than the 660?

[Flash]

yes mate , the hem is pretty small 

[Rain Dogs]

Hello SuFu. Long time no see. I thought I'd drop by and post a quick evolution spread on my Warehouse 800's. I bought these in mid-January and wore them through all the the late winter & spring. They didn't see much wear during the summer months, but it's cooled down enough to be able to wear them again.

Approximately six months of wear. No washes as of yet, but I'm thinking about giving them a good scrubbing this weekend.

Here's a shot of when they were new.

And here's today.

Couple of extras. Forgive the shit quality and horrible lighting. Snapped these while at work.

[Broark]

Very nice, should let them touch water a bit more! 

My 1001's really took off once I started washing them more.

Also I see that Wild Child wallet fade, nice to see someone else rocking one too.

[volvo240thebest]

they're begging for a wash haha! looking good nonetheless!

[ironheartfan123]

just received a sz32 1003sxx from frisbee, my pre-soak measurements (in inches) for anyone interested:

waist: 33.5

front rise: 11.5

back rise: 15

thigh: 12

knee: 10

leg opening: 9

inseam (hemmed to): 32.75

 

frisbee was very easy to do business with and didn't charge me extra for shipping even though the jeans came in a large WH box that they wrapped with an excessive amount of bubble wrap in order to keep it in mint condition; the total after a reduced shipping fee was 25,600 yen which i think is reasonable..didn't have to pay any additional fees at the post office when picking up

 

the denim on these feels much coarser, thicker, and slubbier than my other pair of WH (an 800 from several years ago), though maybe that's just b/c it's still raw (i forget what raw denim feels like after a while)...definitely could've sized down one (went TTS) but i'm happy it'll end up as a true loose fit

 

post soak measurements (soaked in cold water for ~30 mins and line dry):

waist: 31.5

front rise: 11

back rise: 14.5

thigh: 11.75

knee: 9.25

leg opening: 8.5

inseam: 30.75 (hemmed prior to soak)

 

shrank more than expected for a cold soak, feels like it will shrink some more and of course stretch (won't be quite as loose as i first thought)..denim and details look great

Edited October 23, 2015 by ironheartfan123

[d-rew12]

Found out warehouse released a new(ish?) shoe (3300: http://global.rakuten.com/en/store/porkys/item/10003283/?s-id=borderless_browsehist_en)and they look great! Any idea how to size for them? Or at least how to size for the older model and hopefully that carries over. I'm undecided between the 10 and the 11. 

[Flash]

i went down 1 compared to my vans/converse size ( older pf flyers style ) 

[d-rew12]

And the fit pretty good? What is your size in Coverse and Vans? I'm a 10 in converse and an 11 in Vans. So I am leaning towards a 10 (since it's 28cm and my Shoes like pottery were also a 28cm). 

[Flash]

Fits great , I'm a us9 in both and went with an 8 in the warehouse

[jstavrin]

What's the deal with the current 1001? I just tried on a pair at the Daikanyama store on a whim, and the fit was pretty perfect.

[Sugar Mountain]

^ The 1001 is almost certainly my next pair of jeans once I've worked through my SC 47s. I also tried them on in Daikanyama and loved the fit (surprisingly because I didn't two years ago in Osaka!). The fit is a slimmed down, more tapered take on a late 40s style and they are made from the WH Banner denim, which is based on a 1930s Levi's banner and made from three US cottons. The cut seems really versatile, like it would work with everything from work boots to low top sneakers. 

[jstavrin]

^ The 1001 is almost certainly my next pair of jeans once I've worked through my SC 47s. I also tried them on in Daikanyama and loved the fit (surprisingly because I didn't two years ago in Osaka!). The fit is a slimmed down, more tapered take on a late 40s style and they are made from the WH Banner denim, which is based on a 1930s Levi's banner and made from three US cottons. The cut seems really versatile, like it would work with everything from work boots to low top sneakers. 

 

Much obliged! What I like is that the rise is still pretty high, which is often my main concern when it comes to buying jeans (my legs are long and my body is short, making nearly every high rise jean look low on me). This may have been my imagination, but the rise seemed higher than the 47s I'm currently wearing. 

 

edit: here's how they fit me, if anyone's curious. 

 

Edited October 27, 2015 by jstavrin

[setterman]

Are those raw or OW?  I ask because you said you have long legs, but have a pretty decent double cuff there, and when all the shrink is gone from my pair they finished at 31.5" for an inseam (not long!).  If OW, I'd think you could go down a size.

 

1001 is a great regular fit jean, and I'm very pleased with the pair I'm wearing for the DWC. 

[beautiful_FrEaK]

From the pics the denim looks like one-wash so he might be in luck

[setterman]

quick fit picture of my 1001. a bit stretched out since the last wash a month ago.

 

[jstavrin]

Are those raw or OW?  I ask because you said you have long legs, but have a pretty decent double cuff there, and when all the shrink is gone from my pair they finished at 31.5" for an inseam (not long!).  If OW, I'd think you could go down a size.

 

1001 is a great regular fit jean, and I'm very pleased with the pair I'm wearing for the DWC. 

 

From the pics the denim looks like one-wash so he might be in luck 

 

 

They are indeed OW, so I'd need a hem. And I could probably fit into a 31 or a 30, but I don't like the way the proportions change on jean sizes below 32. 

 

Man, I was kinda hoping to grab some Buzz Rickson jeans this trip (for maximum brand synergy!), but these fit so well!

[Ciabatta]

So looking at the charts it looks like on the OW the waist shrinks to tagged size correct? It's probably safe to assume there still some more shrinkage to be expected right?

[clt3]

My OW 1001 has a tag size 32 but its waist measures 31. So I think it shrinks below tag size but still stretches out to tag size.

[setterman]

Yes, they (1001) shrink to 1/2" to 1" below tagged, but stretch back out easily.  

[tchengaa]

my 1001 OW has stretched to around 92 cm from 89 cm in the waist.... need to give them a hot soak later

[bradl]

 

One thing I find interesting is the tightness in combs from my left to right arm, not sure why it's like that tbh