Jump to content
chris_n

Full Count Denim Thread

Recommended Posts

^ IMO, the leather used on Samurai, Strike Gold and The Flat Head belts are better than the others, although you could get similar if not better American and British leathers at a much better price made by a craftsman doing private work.

More and more non-Japanese craftsman are using leathers from Tochigi and Himeji tanneries, so maybe look into that too?

Ultimately, as a Superfuturian, I think if you are paying more than $100 USD for a belt, it ought to be hand-stitched.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At the risk of obsessing over minute details (not the first time!), does anyone own the FC0105 and FC1101 in the same size?  The 0105 is clearly bigger at the leg opening but are there any differences in the top block or thigh measurements?  I find the 1101 in 34 to be a little large in the waist but I fear the 33 might be too trim through the thighs.  Would the 0105 be any different or is it identical above the knees?

 

Thanks.

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At the risk of obsessing over minute details (not the first time!), does anyone own the FC0105 and FC1101 in the same size?  The 0105 is clearly bigger at the leg opening but are there any differences in the top block or thigh measurements?  I find the 1101 in 34 to be a little large in the waist but I fear the 33 might be too trim through the thighs.  Would the 0105 be any different or is it identical above the knees?

 

Thanks.

John

 

Hey John, I have 0105xx and 1101xx both in a 31 and without having measured them I'd say the only noticeable difference is below the knee/leg opening. Thigh and top block seems identical to me. To be honest, they are both such great cuts there's little between them to be an easy rotation, but enough difference to know you've got that particular model on, if that makes sense?! I'll happily measure mine tomorrow to let you know, but from wearing both the only difference with mine is below the knee, and my 1101xx arcs are wider and lower :-)

 

Best,

Ed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi John, as I suspected, the measurements for waist and thigh on my 0105XX and 1101XX are as near as identical as dammit! So I'd recommend going with the same size for both models. In fact, my experience is I go the same size for 0105, 1101, and 1108. The two WW2 models I have (1100-14 and 1100-15 based on 0105 and 1101 respectively) also fit me exactly the same in a 31. I don't have 1109 as I think it's probably a little skinny but tempted by the 1110Z which I'd also opt for in a 31. Hope this helps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks EdwardBear.  I'm not surprised the top block and thighs of the 0105 and 1101 are pretty much identical but appreciate the confirmation!  The issue with many cuts on me is that the thighs are too tight when the waist is just right.  So while I can (probably) wear a 33 or 34 in the 0105 or 1101, the thighs of an 1108 are too tight, even in 34.

 

By the way, I see your 0105 and 1101 are both XX models.  How do you like the heavier XX denim compared to the lighter weight banner denim (e.g., comfort, stretch, feel).

 

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey John, both denims have their merits- most of my Fullcounts are the XX model but my 2015 WW2 are 13.75. I prefer the XX denim personally as it's so comfortable for the heavier weight and seemed to have a bit more character, but once my WW2 have got more wear on them I can compare them much better. Stretch is about the same for both I'd say and whichever the weight you can't go wrong!

 

Best,

Ed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a pair of BNWT unworn raw 0105XX (15.5oz) size 31 that I'd like to swap for a pair of 1101 (13.7 or 15.5oz) in size 31. If anyone's interested, let me know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a pair of BNWT unworn raw 0105XX (15.5oz) size 31 that I'd like to swap for a pair of 1101 (13.7 or 15.5oz) in size 31. If anyone's interested, let me know.

 

Oh man, just yesterday I sent a brand new pair of 1101  13.7oz in 31 to a good mate of mine as they were sitting on my rail and not at the front of the rotation queue! If they don't fit him, I'll let you know as I love my 0105s. Let me know if you end up wanting to sell 'em...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You couldn't make it up EB! I've had these for a few years now and been meaning to do something about them. Let me know how it works out with your mate and if he keeps them we can probably work out a price for the 0105XX.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick question and shameless plug:

 

Just bought a pair of one-wash FC1101 in size 33 that fit well.  Would you soak or wash these before wearing or am I good to go with the wash from the factory?

 

Let me know if you're looking for a brand new pair of one-wash 1101XX in size 34 -- a touch too large in the waist for me.  Had these prior to the 33 and now realize the sizing error.

 

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd wash 'em, just because you don't know who's dirty legs they were on before you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ yes setterman, something I hadn't considered ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ that's pretty much what I was wondering garden gnomes.  Of course, the Fullcount banner denim stretches as much as any I know, so even a little more shrinkage might be compensated by FC stretch ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone have experience with the 15.5 oz. XX denim vs. the banner denim over time (e.g., durability, softness/feel, fades)?  Prefer one or the other?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^Both were fab, in my experience.

The 13.75 gets soft, but more defined ataris, especially along the seams & folds [eg, railroad tracks, roping, etc.] = more vintage fade ... The XX got heft & gives more contrast + 3-D definition @combs/whiskers.

IMO, it's personal preference. I had the 13.75 on the 0105__ would've preferred them on XX so they don't flap about__ 1108/1109 should be good for the 13.75

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found the XX to be one of the most interesting stock denims of all brands I encountered in terms of texture and character. It is a very hairy and slubby denim in world of vintage vibe denims without going to the extreme like PBJ or Oni (which are of course not vintage inspired). It is also very dark and feels robust. 

 

That said I prefer the fades of the 13.75 denim over the XX denim. Those sure take a lot of time to fade and I haven't seen too many examples of pairs I really liked. 

 

So for the look and feel from the get go I would prefer the XX but in the long run with fades and worn in, the standard denim gets my vote.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

very accurate colour. ta for that pp.

 

mine has more contrast since at one stretch i went seven months without a wash, which can sometimes make it look as if i was wearing pre-distressed jeans hahaha.

 

23064985069_d7e428fbfd_c.jpg

 

23324497092_64083a65c8_c.jpg

 

but then again, if pre-distressing can come up with those combs i'll buy em!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found the XX to be one of the most interesting stock denims of all brands I encountered in terms of texture and character. It is a very hairy and slubby denim in world of vintage vibe denims without going to the extreme like PBJ or Oni (which are of course not vintage inspired). It is also very dark and feels robust. 

 

That said I prefer the fades of the 13.75 denim over the XX denim. Those sure take a lot of time to fade and I haven't seen too many examples of pairs I really liked. 

 

So for the look and feel from the get go I would prefer the XX but in the long run with fades and worn in, the standard denim gets my vote.

 

I've managed to squeeze myself back into my 1109xx and have been giving them some wear so will post up pics at some point when it's worthwhile. But i agree on the denim, very nice feel and texture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wearing my 13.7 oz 1101's today for the first time in forever while I wash my Roy's, forgot how comfy they are!
Might have to pick up this years anniversary edition in the 0105 cut once we hear some more details.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen some Fullcount denim in the one-wash format labeled on the inner wash tags with a W at the end of the model name (for example, 1101XXW). Is this true always with FC?

I bought some 1109IC a few months ago and had them hemmed, never wore them until today. They were advertised as one-wash. On inspection however, the patch looks non-washed and there's no "W" on the inner label. Despite that, the measurements seem to match what I can find online for the one-wash variant with a size 34 tag and a perfect 34" waist.

Any idea if that missing W is meaningful or not? I have to decide to either sell these as BNWT or risk soaking them post hem where they may come up both too small and too short.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the 1109IC in a 38. When I hot wash and machine dry them they measure 36 but stretch back out very quickly to tagged size. I needed the extra room in the thighs so I sized up. Easily my most comfortable pair of jeans just wish the waist wouldn't stretch back to tagged size.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the 1109IC in a 38. When I hot wash and machine dry them they measure 36 but stretch back out very quickly to tagged size. I needed the extra room in the thighs so I sized up. Easily my most comfortable pair of jeans just wish the waist wouldn't stretch back to tagged size.

Bummer, if your 38s shrink to 36, then my true 34 is probably raw. No way they'll fit me, especially after a hem. Thanks for the info!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • hello !

    supertalk is free to browse as a guest. You need to be a member to participate in discussions or buy and sell on the classifieds.

    From 2021 new membership is $US 6 / year.

    You can also become a premium superseller or supermember. Businesses who want to promote their brand and products need to become a supersponsor. superfuture is privately owned and has been online continuously for 22 years. It is a digital cockroach and will survive all current and future apocalypses.  

  • Similar Content

    • By maxallou
      View Advert Full Count Jeans S0105W WWII
      Hello there !
      I am selling my S0105W from Full Count because unfortunately it doesn't fit to me.
      It's this one : FULL COUNT S0105W 13.75OZ WWII WIDE STRAIGHT JEAN (RINSED) - size 29/32.
      I've bought it online from Son of a Stag a month ago at the price of 300£ - 347 euros (I have the invoice). Now it's sold out in this size.
      The jeans are brand new. It has been worn for a month only and have been washed once by hands.
       
      Measurements :
      Waist 38cm
      Outseam 103cm
      Leg Opening 22cm
       
      If you have any questions, just let me know !
      Thanks, 
      Max
      IMG_9062.HEIC
      IMG_9061.HEIC
      IMG_9060.HEIC
      IMG_9018.HEIC
      IMG_9017.HEIC
      IMG_9016.HEIC
      IMG_9015.HEIC
      IMG_9014.HEIC
      IMG_9013.HEIC
      IMG_9012.HEIC
      IMG_9011.HEIC






      Advertiser maxallou Date 05/05/2021 Price $300.00 Category clothing  
    • By maxallou
      Hello there !
      I am selling my S0105W from Full Count because unfortunately it doesn't fit to me.
      It's this one : FULL COUNT S0105W 13.75OZ WWII WIDE STRAIGHT JEAN (RINSED) - size 29/32.
      I've bought it online from Son of a Stag a month ago at the price of 300£ - 347 euros (I have the invoice). Now it's sold out in this size.
      The jeans are brand new. It has been worn for a month only and have been washed once by hands.
       
      Measurements :
      Waist 38cm
      Outseam 103cm
      Leg Opening 22cm
       
      If you have any questions, just let me know !
      Thanks, 
      Max
      IMG_9062.HEIC
      IMG_9061.HEIC
      IMG_9060.HEIC
      IMG_9018.HEIC
      IMG_9017.HEIC
      IMG_9016.HEIC
      IMG_9015.HEIC
      IMG_9014.HEIC
      IMG_9013.HEIC
      IMG_9012.HEIC
      IMG_9011.HEIC






    • By lumberjack
      Hello,

      I only accept PayPal and I always ship via USPS priority mail with signature confirmation within one business day, but normally the same day. All prices include shipping and handling. No returns.

      I used the "Blue In Green" method for measuring the pant and jean.

      ALL items in this thread are Mint... never worn.

      Without further ado....

      Hysteric Glamour x Dickies

      These were part of a collaboration between the Japanese brand Hysteric Glamour and Dickies. These are a very skinny fit are a 65/35 poly/cotton blend (much more softer than American Dickes), and they have a back cinch. They are a size 32, but like I said before they are extremely skinny.

      Size 32

      Measurements:

      Waist: 16.75" / 42.55 cm

      Inseam: 31.5" / 80 cm

      Thigh: 11.5" / 29.20 cm

      Knee: 8.75" / 22.23 cm

      Front Rise: 8.5" / 21.60 cm

      Back Rise: 13" / 33 cm

      Hem: 7.75" / 19.69 cm

      Hip: 19" / 48.26 cm

      Full length: 40" / 101.6 cm









      $85
       
    • By devilish
      Doing some clearing out. Will provide pictures upon request. All jeans in good condition and have had at least a soak or one wash. Some small signs of wear but still plenty of life left. All prices will be plus actual shipping cost. Payment via PayPal. All sales final.

      Full Count 1108XX: Size 34" waist, hemmed to 33" inseam. $150.
      LVC 1966: Size 34" waist, hemmed to 30" inseam (for that shorter 60's fit). $100.
      LVC 1878 Pantaloons: Size 33" waist, 32.5" inseam. Suspender buttons sewn on. $150.
      LVC 1915: Size 34" waist, 32" inseam. $150.
      LVC 1944: Size 34" waist, 31.5 inseam. These are the most worn and have had a little self repair to crotch but will hold up for awhile yet. $75.
       
    • By lukedaly
      BRAND NEW
       
      Just got these 5507 tapered Skull's today, but when I ordered them I didn't take into account the fact that I'd lost some weight since I tried them on a few months ago.
       
      Brand New. Size 30, inseam hemmed to 34
       
      Measurements can be found  on the BiG webstore:
      http://blueingreensoho.com/site/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage=shop.flypage&product_id=6005&category_id=&manufacturer_id=37&option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=62
       
      Looking for a quick sale, so I'm willing to let these go for $300 shipped ($345+ retail in USA)
       

       

       
  • Top 10 Active Viewed Topics

  • SSENSE GLOBAL
    SSENSE GLOBAL
  • Balenciaga Seven-Pack White Logo Socks
    SSENCE
    US$ 750

    seven-pack-white-logo-socks.jpgshow?id=gf39VV*YhHg&bids=1028993.1976629