Sugar Cane Denim

[nutusufu]

Awful photo, but topical. Today's Toyo uniform:

 

Buzz Rickson Beanie

Buzz Rickson Pea Coat

Buzz Rickson Chambray

Sugar Cane Belt

Sugar Cane 1947

Lone Wolf Socks

(Alden)

 

Yes, but what underwear?

 

Kidding. The peacoat is excellent. Hell, that whole fit is legit.

[Davil]

Crat those are beautiful!

[bod]

Double 0's pair on db and History Preservations sample pair should be more than reason enough for people to jump on the SC bandwagon....Here are the latter (1947):

 

47 and 66's, best bang for the buck jeans ever

[UkeNo]

Damn, that is a steal of a deal for some ai, glad you grabbed the last 33 as it dulls the pain of not being able to afford/get them.

Just seen this Bradl....

A 32 would fit if you're normally a 33 - mine are more like a 33.75(tag) - I'm sure I could have taken a size 32 - might be able to do

You a favour in turn if you snag a s32.

Just a thought

Edited February 7, 2014 by UkeNo

[edd]

was browsing through rakuten and stumbled across these: http://global.rakuten.com/en/store/frisbee/item/10004578/?s-id=borderless_recommend_item_en

[frank]

Goddamn, that denim looks streaky as fuck.

[SuperJackle]

I think the 1947 cut is the one for me.

Last thing I need is more denim right now!

this.

[jstavrin]

Yes, but what underwear?

 

Kidding. The peacoat is excellent. Hell, that whole fit is legit.

 

Costco, I think.

 

And thanks!

[tmadd]

These last few pages are a pretty good testament to what killer breadth Toyo has just in terms of it's denim, which is doubly impressive to me because they are pretty far from being a "denim first" brand.  They approach everything in all of their collection with the same attentiveness to getting it just right as they do for instance, the 1947s.  

[cool_hand]

The Edo Ai have landed:

The denim is really unlike anything else I have or have seen. It has a wave type of patten where the green alternates with the blue. From the dying process I assume?

Not to mention the slub and nep. Crazy!

The fit is very comfortable and well fitted without being baggy or boxy. A higher rise than normal on me and still plenty of room in the front pockets. I like it a lot.

A special thank to Hollows and Beautiful_Freak for bringing these to my attention and helping me source them.

More pictures to come.

Cheers Guys.

 

Edit: I have just noticed that the older versions of these (eg Hollows pair) have an arc and Tab. Mine don't.

These must be post L3vi's Lawsuit etc.They're still great though.

 

Trying to find these? Help!

[bradl]

Just seen this Bradl....

A 32 would fit if you're normally a 33 - mine are more like a 33.75(tag) - I'm sure I could have taken a size 32 - might be able to do

You a favour in turn if you snag a s32.

Just a thought

Looks like Earthmarket is now sold out in 32, but thanks for the offer!

[Crat]

Could anyone recommend me a pair of canes with a higher rise and slightly wider thighs than my sexsc02?

I love the way they faded (they were my first pair of canes) but to be honest the sexsc02 cut isn't perfect for me. Due to sports I have a big bum and fat thighs. Don't want the leg opening to be too wide tho. 

Would those '47s work? I love the look of them. Other suggestions? 

[exaptavist]

.

Edited October 22, 2015 by hoggreaser

[tmadd]

Could anyone recommend me a pair of canes with a higher rise and slightly wider thighs than my sexsc02?

I love the way they faded (they were my first pair of canes) but to be honest the sexsc02 cut isn't perfect for me. Due to sports I have a big bum and fat thighs. Don't want the leg opening to be too wide tho. 

Would those '47s work? I love the look of them. Other suggestions? 

They way you're describing yourself, it sounds like the 47s are very well suited for you, but they are definitely a wider leg opening than the SExSC02 (yours are insanely good looking btw…).  2009 is a slightly more relaxed cut than the SExSC02, but it's in the same ballpark for sure.  I've never seen the 47s look bad on someone that dialed the inseam length on them in.  

[edd]

@ Crat

 

in addition to the 2009's and 47's, maybe you could try the 66's too. high rise, good thigh space, and a tapered leg. if you look on the previous page, i posted a link from rakuten that sells the 66 in non-wash.

[ironheartfan123]

They way you're describing yourself, it sounds like the 47s are very well suited for you, but they are definitely a wider leg opening than the SExSC02 (yours are insanely good looking btw…).  2009 is a slightly more relaxed cut than the SExSC02, but it's in the same ballpark for sure.  I've never seen the 47s look bad on someone that dialed the inseam length on them in.  

*dialed in the inseam length

 

let's do away with the (Germanic) abberation of the separable prefix verb! 

[Broark]

How does the 1947 compare to the Warehouse 1001?

[jstavrin]

How does the 1947 compare to the Warehouse 1001?

 

Does the cut on the 1001 remain relatively consistent? I have an old-ish pair from 2008, and the leg opening is wider than the 47 by a fair amount. 

[Broark]

The 1001s I recently got are a bit slimmed down compared to other past iterations I believe.

[cool_hand]

/\/\/\ Cool-hand

 

Maybe try Mario at Milwaukee.

 

http://www.mil-mil.net/item/sc40501/

 

 

.... also good resource for full(ish) range 

 

http://www.mil-mil.net/docs/jeans/toyo&jeans.html

 

thanks hogg, it appears they've already sold out?

[bradl]

If anyone has a line on the SC40301, in a 33-34 let me know. 

[Foxy2]

Only got a SC40400 left over in (probably) your size...

[ColdsnapBryan]

I didn't know Sugar Canes were so affordable on Rakuten now. Looks like it's time to replace my 'ol beat up pair. 

 

@Crat I had a pair of 1947s in size 35. As you know I'm a fellow weightlifter, they were a bit constricting in the waist and hips when I was around 200lbs. I can fit into them now at 186lbs but I'm going to buy a 36 this time around. 

 

I'd like to find something with an 8.5-8.75" leg opening with a 13.5" thigh and a long front and back rise, but alas that seems impossible. 

Edited February 22, 2014 by ColdsnapBryan

[exaptavist]

. 

Edited October 10, 2015 by hoggreaser

[Broark]

That's exactly what I would like too.

[ColdsnapBryan]

It's out there somewhere, but I've given up heh. Every time I try something that seems promising *something* is off. These Iron Heart 634 and I'll buy a Sugar Cane 1947 in size 36, think that's a good spread for now

[themaster]

Hi gang where can i get those old sugarcane jeans? Care for some tips?

[exaptavist]

.

Edited October 10, 2015 by hoggreaser

[exaptavist]

. 

Edited October 10, 2015 by hoggreaser

[themaster]

Thanks hoggreaser appreciate all these help.