Warehouse

[Snake]

15th 1001XX at 400 days

[SLAB]

Snake is killing it , again! :eek:

[Guest colt]

how many washes?

[Snake]

colt - one initial soak and 7 hand washes with Dr. Bronner.

Thanks Slab!

[arcarsenal]

Snake, can't rep you for those pics, but they look awesome. Warehouse never disappointing...

[LandoCal126]

Wow nice, haven't heard these being talked about for ages.

Where did you manage to pick them up?

Dude was banned the other day, don't think he will be getting back to you. Just to let you know.

[bluegoldblues]

shit thanks for the heads up, how can you get banned on here?

[LandoCal126]

shit thanks for the heads up, how can you get banned on here?

http://www.superfuture.com/supertalk/showthread.php?t=181126

[devilish]

This was his second ban. First was a pissing contest over football and this time I think was for some homophobic-ish trash talking. IIRC at least.

[SLAB]

X Post

Warehouse 660 (second batch) - nearing one year mark

Picture 227 by SLAB13, on Flickr

Picture 228 by SLAB13, on Flickr

Picture 229 by SLAB13, on Flickr

Picture 230 by SLAB13, on Flickr

[pomata]

beautiful, slab

[grooveholmes]

sheezus. wicked.

[aho]

^I hate that I can barely wear jeans anymore...

[oboy_oboy]

breaking radio silence here--buried in my own life recently--to say those are fucking amazing. i can only hope mine make it close to that someday...

[tsunamiboy85]

^I hate that I can barely wear jeans anymore...

Because of work? I have taken to wearing my jeans to the office, changing out of them for work, then changing back into them when I leave for home. A bit over the top, but I take what I get! Hahaha!

[aho]

^That's some major dedication...We get Friday's but then you have to wear company logo'd shirts which I don't dig...Just going to work up to a "Senior" title that allows me to work from home most of the week haha

[Tiro]

yeah I also have to make due with weekends...

good shit Slab btw!

[andyy]

warehouse 660s

[shinobi2000]

very nice, subtle fade

[kon]

to stay (relatively) on point with all these beautiful pairs of 660's, I have a small question that I have been meaning to ask for some time. does anyone know why the older run's, not the newer BiG run, of the 660's had such a drastic difference in tagged size and actual size? was there a stylistic reasoning to this? would this question be better served in the small questions thread?

[robotbox]

to stay (relatively) on point with all these beautiful pairs of 660's, I have a small question that I have been meaning to ask for some time. does anyone know why the older run's, not the newer BiG run, of the 660's had such a drastic difference in tagged size and actual size? was there a stylistic reasoning to this? would this question be better served in the small questions thread?

I think the new run may have the same sizing, despite what BIG might say.

I'm a true 36, and I bought my 660's in size 34. After 2 hot soaks, theres still plenty of room in the waist.

[ETW 360]

The new run do not have the same sizing. I got a pair and they shrank down close to tagged size

[moykky]

Nice pairs there!

Why don't I have a pair of 660's...

[setterman]

1001XX 15th Anniv. I think the last time I washed them was back in June. Figure a day or two a week wear since then. Like them where they're currently at and I'm in no hurry to wear them in.

By setterman at 2011-09-07

[D'eVils]

nice evo. hey i am real confused at the moment. has warehouse sizing changed. i read whole thread and thought consensus on 660 was to size down around two. im a 32 waist and ordered the 30 in 660. just got them in the mail today and tthey are tight as hell. i measured them pre soak and they are 30 in the waist. on the big website it said a 30 would measue approx 35 pre soak. these do not. i saw a couple pages back that someone said the sizing might have changed, but then i saw someone say no.

[robotbox]

nice evo. hey i am real confused at the moment. has warehouse sizing changed. i read whole thread and thought consensus on 660 was to size down around two. im a 32 waist and ordered the 30 in 660. just got them in the mail today and tthey are tight as hell. i measured them pre soak and they are 30 in the waist. on the big website it said a 30 would measue approx 35 pre soak. these do not. i saw a couple pages back that someone said the sizing might have changed, but then i saw someone say no.

I'm the guy who said I thought the sizing had NOT changed.

I may be wrong, if it's changed very recently, but I bought mine in June from BiG and sized down 2 inches, and they fit great. I don't know if it's just that way for bigger sizes (I'm a true 36) but I'm quite surprised that your pair measured TTS pre-soak

[ah_long]

anyone who missed the j crew 700J sale, I'm selling mine @ cost, brand new, never worn.. see sig

[beautiful_FrEaK]

well, give Gordon a call and he will sort you out, I'm sure

[setterman]

nice evo. hey i am real confused at the moment. has warehouse sizing changed. i read whole thread and thought consensus on 660 was to size down around two. im a 32 waist and ordered the 30 in 660. just got them in the mail today and tthey are tight as hell. i measured them pre soak and they are 30 in the waist. on the big website it said a 30 would measue approx 35 pre soak. these do not. i saw a couple pages back that someone said the sizing might have changed, but then i saw someone say no.

the cut didn't change, but with the most recent batch of 660s, the labeling changed. with older 660s, their raw measurement was 4" bigger than tagged size and shrank to two inches bigger than tagged size. Current 660s are 2" bigger than tagged size, and shrink to tagged size.

The confusion with true to size, size up, size down, comes from whether the speaker is referring to their actual waist size, or the tagged size of the jeans. The people saying size down on the old 660s were referring to tag size rather than the actual measurement of the jeans or their own waist. I think it's much smarter to refer to waist size. And in the case of your 660s, they should have measured 32" at the waist, which would be true to size for you (which is how I wear my 1001XXs, not a problem since they are a full cut). With the 660s, you need to size up one to size 31, or two to a size 32.

[D'eVils]

thnx for info guys. i called big, gordon was really helpful. he pretty much said exactly what u said setterman. he does still have some of the old batch, and since i have read this entire thread i am going to go with the sizing on the old batch. my "true measured waist" is around a 32, so ima go with a tagged 30 in the old batch. im hype needless to say.