Jump to content

SUPERDENIM SMALL QUESTIONS THREAD (Use instead of making new threads)


minya

Recommended Posts

Yeah… thanks for the tip that they stocked both! When I checked earlier something seemed off hah. I was hoping to find a direct comparison between a stockist who has good measurement charts but they’re all so hit or miss. 
 

Funny how there are detailed measurements for multiple different points on jeans and no one seems to agree on what the measurements are on a model. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes - it's all part of the song and dance of this whole thing! 

I would say for the most part that the manufacturers measurements (e.g. the warehouse ones here for 1001XX's: https://www.ware-house.co.jp/?pid=132358411) are usually the most reliable, you could cross check that (and account for shrinkage given those are raw) with Full Count's chart for 1101's here: https://fullcount.co/collections/core-denim-pants/products/1101-straight-denim-13-7oz

I believe they both measure the same way, at the same points on the garment etc.

I am certain though that someone will have contradictory information on manufacturers / brands having the best measurements through first hand experience, again, part of the whole ritual of this hobby!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When in doubt just email shop for photos of measurements with measuring tape. Then you know the method of measuring, and you know how you read the measuring tape (a shop’s 39 cm waist may, in a photo, be something you’d consider 40 cm, for instance). It’s not perfect but it’s about as close as you can get without trying on. Also, sometimes places make typos. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/19/2024 at 4:09 PM, gmn said:

I've yet to find an online store that sells both the FC 1101 (new w/o arcs) and Warehouse 1001xx standard model to compare size charts—does anyone own both and could comment on the fit? It seems like the FC 1101 will be a bit roomier/wider at the same tagged size?

I have the Fullcount 1101W 13.75oz in 36/36: 35w, 11.75fr, 17br, 13t, 9.75k, 9lo, 34i 

& Warehouse 1001XX 13.5oz in 36/32: 35w, 11.75fr, 16.50br, 13.25t, 9.50k, 8.875lo, 32i

I'm 36", so I was expecting some stretch, and they are only ~13oz, so they are not too rigid. The above measurements are mine BTW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, reallypeacedoff said:

I have the Fullcount 1101W 13.75oz in 36/36: 35w, 11.75fr, 17br, 13t, 9.75k, 9lo, 34i 

& Warehouse 1001XX 13.5oz in 36/32: 35w, 11.75fr, 16.50br, 13.25t, 9.50k, 8.875lo, 32i

I'm 36", so I was expecting some stretch, and they are only ~13oz, so they are not too rigid. The above measurements are mine BTW.

Thank you for these! Interesting that the thigh is a touch smaller on the FC. I was expecting the opposite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Follow up with a comparison now that I have both. Measurements at every point down the leg are about 0.25” larger on the Fullcount 1101xx, but the top block is cut differently enough (slightly smaller front rise, larger back rise, good bit wider hip measurement) which makes them fit a good bit looser. Exactly what I was after. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Maybe this is all in my head, but I've got a pair of size 32 Fullcount 1101, and a pair of 33 Resolute 714. They have almost identical measurements down the leg (we're talking probably 0.125" difference at any given spot), but the Fullcounts have a solid bit more back rise.

What is making the fit around my thigh feel so different? Is it the way the pattern is cut? Can that make a difference? Is it in fact the back rise that makes everything feel looser and more comfortable on the Fullcount? 

I'm trying to get a better sense of what qualities of a cut give the jeans the fit I like and make them comfortable. 

Some pics for reference—both pairs are worn with the crotch at the same height: 

Fullcount 1101 fit

IMG_3273.thumb.jpeg.6fbba75a83a8bca5e19d84616ab87567.jpeg

Resolute 714 fit

IMG_3274.thumb.jpeg.a43ca40649fc89cf714dcc8d0563313f.jpeg

Extra fabric I can pinch around mid thigh on the Fullcount

IMG_3277.thumb.jpeg.f3cf0ded00a748a2fee76c1a8ddfcda0.jpeg

Extra fabric I can pinch around mid thigh on the Resolute

IMG_3275.thumb.jpeg.6856937ceddc11b0eb329e2388e6bcbc.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ The way the pattern is cut makes all the difference. This is why some brands’ jeans (like Sugar Cane or Warehouse) seem to fit almost everyone pretty well and some brands’ jeans (like ONI or N&F) manage to fit almost no one: patterning and grading are really not straightforward. It’s not possible to tell how jeans (a 3D object) will fit—or how two pairs of jeans will compare to each other—based on a few 1D measurements any more than it’s possible to look at a few measurements and use that to produce a functioning pattern for a pair of jeans.

That said, if you’re just looking at how the legs fit, you’re at a pretty big advantage here since both pairs are cut with straight outseams to accommodate the edges of the denim. If they hit your crotch at the same point (which, admittedly, is a pretty big if), you should be able to tell everything about how they’ll fit your legs by separately measuring the widths of the front and back panels at a few places. My bet would be that one pair has an inseam that sits appreciably farther forward than the other’s, towards the crotch—and that they’re probably cut with fairly different curves through the crotch and seat.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, julian-wolf said:

^ My bet would be that one pair has an inseam that sits appreciably farther forward than the other’s, towards the crotch—and that they’re probably cut with fairly different curves through the crotch and seat.

Thanks for this explanation!

This has got to be it—the front rise on the Fullcount is actually ~0.25" shorter than the Resolutes, but the  back rise is 1.75" larger than the Resolutes. This makes the front thigh section of the leg on my Fullcounts 1.5" smaller across than an identical measurement on my Resolutes, even though the "thigh measurement" is almost exactly the same.

Not totally sure I am wrapping my head around why where the seams in the leg are makes such a difference in the fit, but I buy your explanation that this is the cause.

Edited by gmn
Messed up the quote formatting
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, gmn said:

Not totally sure I am wrapping my head around why where the seams in the leg are makes such a difference in the fit, but I buy your explanation that this is the cause.

Once you get towards the lower legs, it doesn’t make a difference how the fabric is distributed between the panels as long as the outseam is cut straight, but up top it can be an okay proxy for the overall shape of the crotch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Other quicky for you. Loop & Weft looks like they have Western sizing, is that correct? I generally get L in Japanese tees, but the measurements for L&W tees suggest I should get M ... unless I'm missing something (shrinkage maybe?)

Edited by JDelage
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As mentioned above it depends on the brand, fabric and remaining inseam length.

A worked example from me would be I bought Warehouse Duck Digger 1001XX 1947, they come one washed, I had them hemmed to 28 1/2", they have over the course of a year lost another 1". That was with Warehouse's banner denim, I've found that most unsanforised denim will do similar things.

Any more clues on brand or fabric might help with some more specific advice!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Alec Leamas said:

As mentioned above it depends on the brand, fabric and remaining inseam length.

A worked example from me would be I bought Warehouse Duck Digger 1001XX 1947, they come one washed, I had them hemmed to 28 1/2", they have over the course of a year lost another 1". That was with Warehouse's banner denim, I've found that most unsanforised denim will do similar things.

Any more clues on brand or fabric might help with some more specific advice!

Would be the Studio D'Artisan Sp-084 or Hinode's

Samurai S510XX20OZGA, the 20th anniversary ones with the "Buddha" symbols and

Samurai S5000XX-2ND-20TH, collab pair with 2nd.

I'm hoping I'll be safe to leave a cm or two extra and get away with it.  

This is my first time with Japanese denim so I'm a bit out of my depth 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, OutSider said:

Would be the Studio D'Artisan Sp-084 or Hinode's

Samurai S510XX20OZGA, the 20th anniversary ones with the "Buddha" symbols and

Samurai S5000XX-2ND-20TH, collab pair with 2nd.

I'm hoping I'll be safe to leave a cm or two extra and get away with it.  

This is my first time with Japanese denim so I'm a bit out of my depth 

 

From my experience with Samurai and SDA, I can say that after the first wash, they practically don’t shrink in length during subsequent washes. You can leave an extra 1 cm for peace of mind. For raw denim, you can assume they’ll shrink by 4-5 cm, but it’s better to check online stores that sell these models, where you can find information about shrinkage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. I figured I should be ok. I'll leave about an inch extra. Can always do a small cuff if I have to. 

I figure I may have a bot more shrinkage in the 2nd collab pair as they didn't shrink as much as the others.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm looking to add a few thermal tees for fall/winter layering. They should be long sleeve, all cotton, medium weight, have decently long sleeves for my long arms, and not absurdly expensive. I tried on an Iron Heart thermal at my local retailer at the start of the year and liked it a lot, but it was maybe a bit bulkier than I wanted, and I balked at the price tag. 

It doesn't need to be by a premium/made-in-Japan brand even, but I would like something all cotton with no synthetic fibers, which likely rules out cheaper options like Uniqlo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Cold Summer said:

I'm looking to add a few thermal tees for fall/winter layering. They should be long sleeve, all cotton, medium weight, have decently long sleeves for my long arms, and not absurdly expensive. I tried on an Iron Heart thermal at my local retailer at the start of the year and liked it a lot, but it was maybe a bit bulkier than I wanted, and I balked at the price tag. 

It doesn't need to be by a premium/made-in-Japan brand even, but I would like something all cotton with no synthetic fibers, which likely rules out cheaper options like Uniqlo.

UES has a few different thermal options

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...