Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/28/24 in all areas
-
11 points
-
10 points
-
6 points
-
4 points
-
4 points
-
3 points
-
@yung_flynn If you really want good advice, call up one of the brands. I know White’s has fitted people in your situation for decades, and I’m sure Nick’s and the others would be able to as well. They (the PNW brands) have a variety of lasts including those with less arch support. Give them a call and see—they are generally good people to work with.2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
1 point
-
@JDelage Thank you! I do like the fit, it's a bit different to the rest of the collection but that's a good thing I think1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
I’ve heard plenty of success stories of folks w/ low arches trying the 55 last (or similar) and finding it more comfortable than they ever expected—but if wearing orthotics that don’t conform to your natural foot shape feels unnatural to you, it’s not clear why wearing boots built to be shaped like orthotics should be any different1 point
-
1 point
-
Brand Model Size State Storage Denime 66 (Orizzonti) 34 worn Box Denime 66 (Original Line) 34 worn Box Denime 66 (Original Line) 34 BNWT Vacuum Denime XX (Orizzonti) 34 worn Hanger Denime XX (Shins) 34 ONE_WASH Hanger Denime XX (Original Line) 36 worn Hanger Denime XX (Original Line) 36 BNWT Vacuum Denime 66XX (Orizzonti) 36 BNWT Hanger Denime 66XX (Shins) 36 worn Hanger Denime 66XX (Shins) 36 ONE_WASH Box Denime 66XX (Original Line) 34 worn Box Denime 66XX (Original Line) 36 ONE_WASH Hanger Denime XX 1951 (Shins) 34 worn Box Denime WW2 (Orizzonti) 34 worn Box Denime 10th Anniversary (Orizzonti) 34 worn Box Denime 10th Anniversary (Orizzonti) 34 BNWT Vacuum Denime 20th Anniversary (Shins) 36 worn Box Denime Tokyo Edtion (Shins) 34 worn Box Denime Lot. 220A (Warehouse) 34 worn Hanger Denime Lot. 221 (Warehouse) 34 BNWT Vacuum Denime Lot. 224 (Warehouse) 34 worn Box Denime DNM 101B 34 worn Hanger Resolute 710 36x34 worn Box Resolute 710 36x33 worn Hanger Resolute 710 36x33 BNWT Box Resolute 711 34x36 worn Hanger Resolute 711 34x32 worn Box Resolute 714 34x34 worn Hanger Conner's Sewing Factory S409XXX M-47 38 worn Wardrobe Full Count 0105 34 worn Wardrobe Libra Pondus 40s 36 worn Box Sugar Cane 1943 (49009) 34 BNWT Vacuum Sugar Cane 1946 (49007) 34 worn Hanger Freewheelers 601XX 1947 34x32 worn Wardrobe If someone wants to take the Libra Pondus or Freewheelers off my hands, DM me1 point
-
WTB LA6K-DS - Size S, Black LA6B-DS - Size S, Schwarzrot J89-AD - Size S P34-E - Size S, Black [[Still open to buying your unwanted spike ornaments.]] WTS C1-AM - Size S [10/10] $800 P23A-DS - Size S, Black [9.5/10] $888 $600 J29-WS - Size S, Black (SS21) [9.5/10] $1200 SOLD P32-S - Size S, Raf Green [9/10] $750 // Worn a few of times. Still a true size S, hand washed and hung dry only, no shrinkage at all. No fading. Color like new, trace patina. SOLD J28-GT - Size S, Black [9.5/10] $1800 $1600 Images here. -> https://imgur.com/a/LG6ul941 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Some fit pics on my Cats Drive pair, for illustration of the fit on a different body type. I put them on again today to find that actually, they're not so uncomfortable and maybe I will put some time into them - the fabric is already softening and I imagine will become very comfortable over time. I actually did the same thing, I compared the size charts beforehand to my DD-1001XX (1947) (essentially my North star fit-preference wise, granted the waist is a bit big for me, but overall as yet unbeatable) - and the comparison of the measurements I need to know about looks like this: DD1001XX (34) // TCB Cat's Drive (32) Waist (flat): 42cm // 40cm Front Rise: 31cm // 32cm Thigh (my KEY measurement): 31cm // 31cm Hem width (at unhemmed inseam length): 21.5cm // 20cm Given that, I imagined I was going to be in for a spacious pair - as you can see - I was indeed not! As mentioned above it was truly a lesson in a set of measurements not giving the full picture. It wasn't the fit I was after, but maybe I'll get along with it anyway! They certainly won't be getting my usual treatment of regular wash and dries.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
This one is from last week but I’m going to share anyway because I really like this rugby. It’s a vintage Rugged Wear rugby from the 80s or 90s with big Rubber buttons that reminds me of vintage climbing rugbies. Chinos are Buzz WW2 (complete 180 from the TCB pair I wore yesterday in terms of fit). Shoes are Rancourt ranger Mocs1 point
-
Various recent boot porn. Vintage Chippewa Engineer steel toe 10EE, a but too wide and roomy, looking to sell Vintage Laredo with cutouts, 9.5d but very narrow, great profile Vintage Chippewa, both 10D Frye Engineer and Chippewa getting some love Vintage Frye pre polish Vintage no name snip toe, my oldest and favorite1 point
-
Cross-post from WAYWT. I've always thought Stevenson jeans looked really cool but I feel like their sewing and design details really lend themselves well to pants like these. I feel this is one of the best-fitting pairs of pants I've worn, of any type. The waist is maybe an inch or so loose, but nothing a belt can't fix.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
0 points
-
https://discord.com/invite/TFYt858eVT public discord my friend. I think it's simply that nobody can be bothered copy & pasting something like 40 images0 points