atlast&co , butcher products , timeworn clothing

[okimoto]

Can anyone confirm if TWC makes a size 29 in their jeans?

[Signet]

hows the prices over at brogue compared to japan?

[julian-wolf]

Expensive, but honestly less so than most other Western retailers. Jeans around $300 jackets around $400. Similar to Freewheelers.

[frank]

A long shot, but anybody have an idea of the shrinkage on the denim used for the Lot 215 Type 2 jacket? Kinda in between sizes depending on the amount of shrinkage. Also, is the denim on all of the jackets same? E.g. the 118J, 147J and this lot 215.

Edited April 23 by frank

[SLAYER]

On 4/23/2025 at 2:30 PM, frank said:

A long shot, but anybody have an idea of the shrinkage on the denim used for the Lot 215 Type 2 jacket? Kinda in between sizes depending on the amount of shrinkage. Also, is the denim on all of the jackets same? E.g. the 118J, 147J and this lot 215.

They are all tagged as 12oz denim so i assume its the same.

I'd say they shrink a full size, but check this thread for more detailed meassurments

[southofnonorth]

@SLAYER saw your WAYWT post. What was the range/stock level like at the Osaka store? 

[SLAYER]

10 hours ago, southofnonorth said:

@SLAYER saw your WAYWT post. What was the range/stock level like at the Osaka store? 

only the base collection, no seasonal items

Will be in tokyo next week maybe they have more

[southofnonorth]

Does anyone have fit notes on the lot. 212? I’m interested in how the rise and leg opening compare to the lot. 147

 

[Alec Leamas]

On 12/9/2024 at 11:25 AM, SLAYER said:

Current Military Chino 

@SLAYER - What's the lot number on these please? and do you happen to know whether they're standard stock or a seasonal piece?

I'm looking here there and everywhere for a solid hbt pair that will be guaranteed roomy enough for me and something from these guys is becoming one of very few choices left

[SLAYER]

1 hour ago, Alec Leamas said:

What's the lot number on these please?

They don't have a Lot. Nr. there just called Military Chino, Butcher Products version from this year.

Seasonal or not i don't know, but they have been doing some kind of HBT pant every year with slight changes.

definitely very roomy

[Alec Leamas]

Cool thank you, I thought that might be the case - I'll probably ping them a request for "a pair of the current hbt Military Chino"

[SLAYER]

bottom left @Alec Leamas

 

[Alec Leamas]

On 5/9/2025 at 4:51 PM, SLAYER said:

bottom left @Alec Leamas

 

Nice, thank you! Been in touch with them over email today and hopefully have a pair on the way to me soon!

[SLAB]

anyone know the prices of the denim in Japanese stores? Considering if it's worth having my wife bring a pair of 161 or 147 this summer

[MJF9]

@SLAYER has been buying in store recently so should be able to help mate

[smoothsailor]

What’s left of lot 147 and 161.

147 is from 2016 and 161 from 2018

 

[Alec Leamas]

5 hours ago, SLAB said:

anyone know the prices of the denim in Japanese stores? Considering if it's worth having my wife bring a pair of 161 or 147 this summer

34000 yen I paid for jeans - I recently picked up a pair of 147.

Granted this was mail order, I don't think there's much difference if any though!

 

[chicote]

Can anyone advise me on the 147s, if you had to go up or down a size, which would you pick? I’ve wanted a pair for ages but can never make up my mind, and they’re a little too pricey to just gamble on…

[Broark]

@chicote I would probably say size up, I sold my 147s because the waist was a bit more nipped than I anticipated.
I also didn't give them much of a chance to stretch, but I personally think most of their jeans look better sized up.

[okimoto]

Agreed with @Broark, the general consensus here seems to be sizing up for cinchback pairs. My pair of 147s does not have much hip flare at all and has never stretched much with a belt. Lean into the stove pipe look!

[southofnonorth]

2 hours ago, chicote said:

Can anyone advise me on the 147s, if you had to go up or down a size, which would you pick? I’ve wanted a pair for ages but can never make up my mind, and they’re a little too pricey to just gamble on…

My 147 are true to size (whatever that means) and they fit perfect. But if you can only go up or down then go up one. As @okimoto implied the hip is unforgiving. 

For comparison I am a 31 in Warehouse, etc and wear a 31 in the 147. 

 

[Facini]

I've had this 147J for quite some time now. Fell like i wanted to get rid of it for a while and it's just been sitting in the closet for a long time. Man, I'm i glad i came to my senses and didn't sell this jacket. Such an amazing jacket.

[Alec Leamas]

8 hours ago, southofnonorth said:

My 147 are true to size (whatever that means) and they fit perfect. But if you can only go up or down then go up one. As @okimoto implied the hip is unforgiving. 

For comparison I am a 31 in Warehouse, etc and wear a 31 in the 147. 

 

This is interesting, and not wanting to confuse the matter, but I am 34 across all Warehouse pairs, yet 32 in all At Last trousers - be they denim / chinos / other.

Fully agree though if you're in between then go up.

[MJF9]

@chicote as per comments above, the 147s are slimmer in the hip and so if you're in between sizes then going for the bigger size makes sense.  They are not massively stretchy either compared to other jeans - pretty, nicely solid.  I have a w34 that fit nicely... I think I could also wear a w36 and they'd be fine too.  A cinch and belt combination should fix any issues. 

Edited June 26 by MJF9

[harls]

2 hours ago, Facini said:

I've had this 147J for quite some time now. Fell like i wanted to get rid of it for a while and it's just been sitting in the closet for a long time. Man, I'm i glad i came to my senses and didn't sell this jacket. Such an amazing jacket.

Looks great - perfect cut and exactly how this jacket is meant to fit imo. Now you've got me wanting to buy one, especially as my 161J is on the looser side these days.

[southofnonorth]

1 hour ago, Alec Leamas said:

This is interesting, and not wanting to confuse the matter, but I am 34 across all Warehouse pairs, yet 32 in all At Last trousers - be they denim / chinos / other.

Fully agree though if you're in between then go up.

I’m not too surprised by this; most of my At Last jeans are one down from my Warehouse size. The high rise on the 147 & 161 puts them close to my actual waist

 

[SLAB]

kind of got this pot belly going so I think I'll go for my usual size and not size down

[ColdsnapBryan]

I think the best thing you can do for At Last Co. is to try it on in store and take the sales associate sizing advice since all their items are based on a different pattern. I did that and left with a 42 jacket and 34 pant in the lot 147, which is much different to my usual 40 jacket and 36 pant TTS. So that would be almost a size down in the 147, it's their widest cut. 

Those who have the 147 jacket @Facini does the fabric go through a stage of being very hairy? I was surprised at how much hair the denim had once it came out of the first wash. 

Edited June 26 by ColdsnapBryan

[southofnonorth]

I imagine the reason @chicote is asking is because he can’t try on in store. 

[Alec Leamas]

11 hours ago, southofnonorth said:

I imagine the reason @chicote is asking is because he can’t try on in store. 

Most probably correct, absolutely no chance for me being able to try items anywhere either - however, @chicote if you are looking to buy direct from Timeworn themselves - the process is super easy, and Isao is very willing to share sizing information and suggestions.