Jump to content
supertalk6
chris_n

Full Count Denim Thread

Recommended Posts

I agree with Geeman. If the measurements works for you, I would size down one size. My size 33 1101 measure 35.5 in the waist after a week of wear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Geeman said:

Rule of thumb with Fullcount is size down one. Very forgiving denim and comfortable top blocks. 

Go one wash, take the guesswork out.

perfect. i tried on the 1109 onewash, not sure the store does a 1110 one wash. if i get one wash - will the waist still stretch out? also - ALL shinkage is gone after one wash, correct (just trying to avoid having jeans too tight on thighs again)

if there is no 1110 one wash - any idea how the thighs would end up on a 32 or 33 waist (my natural waist 34)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/30/2017 at 7:56 AM, beautiful_FrEaK said:

If I’m not completely wrong the 1110 is slimmer and more tapered than the 1109. The 1109 is rather a slim/narrow straight (with only a gentle taper) whereas the 1110 is slim and has significant taper.
The Z refers to Zipper. The 1110 exists as a version with zipper and with buttons. The XX however refers to the denim and is the Full Count’s 15.5oz denim. The 1100Z or 1110 come in Full Count’s flagship denim with 13.7oz. Both denims are made of Zimbabwe cotton. The XX denim is also darker than the regular denim but also fades slower (from what I have seen).

The Okaya site is describing the 1110 as "true slim tapered, ample room in middle rise, comfortable sized thighs, with aggressive taper to leg opening". desribes the 1009 as "low rise, narrow top block, slim knees and taper to leg opening". goes on to suggest 1110 for wider thighs - that seem accurate/reasonable? when you say the 1110 is slimmer than 1109 makes me question if the Okaya statements are accurate. trying to decide between 1110 and 1109 or maybe even the 1108 - but from pictures i prefer the 1110 or 1109 aesthic. anyways just want to make sure i'm getting the info right!

https://www.okayamadenim.com/blogs/news/find-your-fit-which-fullcount-pair-is-best-for-you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, jsky808080 said:

The Okaya site is describing the 1110 as "true slim tapered, ample room in middle rise, comfortable sized thighs, with aggressive taper to leg opening". desribes the 1009 as "low rise, narrow top block, slim knees and taper to leg opening". goes on to suggest 1110 for wider thighs - that seem accurate/reasonable? when you say the 1110 is slimmer than 1109 makes me question if the Okaya statements are accurate. trying to decide between 1110 and 1109 or maybe even the 1108 - but from pictures i prefer the 1110 or 1109 aesthic. anyways just want to make sure i'm getting the info right!

https://www.okayamadenim.com/blogs/news/find-your-fit-which-fullcount-pair-is-best-for-you

Its interesting that their size guides suggest otherwise - the 1109 has the same hem as a 1108 but slimmer knees and thighs #bootcut. The 1110 have a high rise and wider thighs than a 1108 but from the knee down they are a very aggressive taper I had to peel mine off after every wear. tigerstrom 1101 look great but again the okayama sizing suggest these are slimmer than a 1108 and I find the thigh on these too tight in my usual 34 waist (don't know why this is bold text sorry all)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

size 32 on all the cuts will get u yr desired 34 waist easy after stretch (even in one wash). then it's just a matter of working out which form/shape/fit of the cuts u like best. in the old cuts, the thigh width gradually increases from 1108 to 1101 to 0105. since 1101 has a looser top block it feels like it has more taper than 1108. 1109 should be tighter than 1108 and pretty much same shape. 1110 has the currently popular "relaxed taper" fit. 1101 i think is the easiest wearing if you're worried about the thighs/legs being too tight but don't want the super relaxed fit of the 0105.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, jsky808080 said:

perfect. i tried on the 1109 onewash, not sure the store does a 1110 one wash. if i get one wash - will the waist still stretch out? also - ALL shinkage is gone after one wash, correct (just trying to avoid having jeans too tight on thighs again)

if there is no 1110 one wash - any idea how the thighs would end up on a 32 or 33 waist (my natural waist 34)

Yes the one wash will still stretch out, I can't comment on a 32-33 measurements as I wear 31. 

Also,... what Ooms said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, oomslokop said:

size 32 on all the cuts will get u yr desired 34 waist easy after stretch (even in one wash). then it's just a matter of working out which form/shape/fit of the cuts u like best. in the old cuts, the thigh width gradually increases from 1108 to 1101 to 0105. since 1101 has a looser top block it feels like it has more taper than 1108. 1109 should be tighter than 1108 and pretty much same shape. 1110 has the currently popular "relaxed taper" fit. 1101 i think is the easiest wearing if you're worried about the thighs/legs being too tight but don't want the super relaxed fit of the 0105.

perfect. from pictures i can see on the full count site of guys wearing the jeans (although they may have different builds than western men)-  i like the look of 1108, 1110 and sometimes 1109 (but dont like the lower rise of the 1109 on me). the 1101 looks a bit too relaxed for what i'm going for - so i think it will be between the 1108 or 1110. would the 1108 and 1110 have similar thigh measurements? or 1108 wider thigh?

i hope the store has one wash then should be relatively easy to size with your advice re waist (thanks!!)

ps: when you say "old cuts" - i think you mean with arcs/tabs? the ones at the london stocklist still have arcs (tabs removed). i think i saw on here arcs/tabs going which may mean new cut coming too?

Edited by jsky808080

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

old cuts = fc's three flagship cuts, 1108, 1101, 0105. the thighs on the 1108 are not spacious by any means, 1110 has a little more room up top on the thigh/crotch but way more taper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, oomslokop said:

old cuts = fc's three flagship cuts, 1108, 1101, 0105. the thighs on the 1108 are not spacious by any means, 1110 has a little more room up top on the thigh/crotch but way more taper.

seems the 1108 thigh with 32 waist is around 12.5 - unless it shinks up but i'll try to go with onewash. i just wanted thighs to be around 11.9 - 12.3. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can tell you the thighs will probably be tighter on the 1108. My size 34 and 35 have around 12.25-12.5" thighs after a wash so the size 32 should be slimmer. But if you can handly 11.9" it could work.

Edited by beautiful_FrEaK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i wear 32 in 1108. if u can wait till next week i can give u real life measurements of a 4yo pair.

Edited by oomslokop
more info

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/8/2018 at 12:06 PM, beautiful_FrEaK said:

I can tell you the thighs will probably be tighter on the 1108. My size 34 and 35 have around 12.25-12.5" thighs after a wash so the size 32 should be slimmer. But if you can handly 11.9" it could work.

the 3 sixteens i have now are 11.4 thights (fine when standing but annoy me when at work sitting down). i think 11.9 would be all good. having a few days from the forum does seem over the top to analyse 11.4 vs 11.9 - but in my mind it makes a difference. thanks for the detailed info.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

    • By lumberjack
      Hello,

      I only accept PayPal and I always ship via USPS priority mail with signature confirmation within one business day, but normally the same day. All prices include shipping and handling. No returns.

      I used the "Blue In Green" method for measuring the pant and jean.

      ALL items in this thread are Mint... never worn.

      Without further ado....

      Hysteric Glamour x Dickies

      These were part of a collaboration between the Japanese brand Hysteric Glamour and Dickies. These are a very skinny fit are a 65/35 poly/cotton blend (much more softer than American Dickes), and they have a back cinch. They are a size 32, but like I said before they are extremely skinny.

      Size 32

      Measurements:

      Waist: 16.75" / 42.55 cm

      Inseam: 31.5" / 80 cm

      Thigh: 11.5" / 29.20 cm

      Knee: 8.75" / 22.23 cm

      Front Rise: 8.5" / 21.60 cm

      Back Rise: 13" / 33 cm

      Hem: 7.75" / 19.69 cm

      Hip: 19" / 48.26 cm

      Full length: 40" / 101.6 cm









      $85
       
    • By devilish
      Doing some clearing out. Will provide pictures upon request. All jeans in good condition and have had at least a soak or one wash. Some small signs of wear but still plenty of life left. All prices will be plus actual shipping cost. Payment via PayPal. All sales final.

      Full Count 1108XX: Size 34" waist, hemmed to 33" inseam. $150.
      LVC 1966: Size 34" waist, hemmed to 30" inseam (for that shorter 60's fit). $100.
      LVC 1878 Pantaloons: Size 33" waist, 32.5" inseam. Suspender buttons sewn on. $150.
      LVC 1915: Size 34" waist, 32" inseam. $150.
      LVC 1944: Size 34" waist, 31.5 inseam. These are the most worn and have had a little self repair to crotch but will hold up for awhile yet. $75.
       
    • By lukedaly
      BRAND NEW
       
      Just got these 5507 tapered Skull's today, but when I ordered them I didn't take into account the fact that I'd lost some weight since I tried them on a few months ago.
       
      Brand New. Size 30, inseam hemmed to 34
       
      Measurements can be found  on the BiG webstore:
      http://blueingreensoho.com/site/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage=shop.flypage&product_id=6005&category_id=&manufacturer_id=37&option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=62
       
      Looking for a quick sale, so I'm willing to let these go for $300 shipped ($345+ retail in USA)
       

       

       
    • By skcusdog
      Recently purchased Full Count 1109xx w34 for sale.
      They were soak once and where tried on. Too big for me should have gone for W33>
      All tags are still available purchased from AND Japan
      Price: $260 shipped
    • By tsunamiboy85
      for sale or trade! Fullcount #1614 raw and unsoaked, 31x34. Low rise, straight cut, 100% Zimb. cotton. Still with the tab and the Fullcount arcs.
      These should shrink around 1-1.5 inches in the waist, around 2 in the inseam and 0.5 all around. Measurements (in inches and BiG style):
      W: 36 (seems huge for a 31, but these are quite low-rised, and fit me, a 31 in Denime XX type and 32 in Eternal 811s just fine. Would shrink to probably a 35, or 34.5)
      Front rise: 9.5
      Back Rise: 13
      Thigh: 11.75
      Knee: 9.75
      Leg Opening: 9.25
      Inseam: 36
      Pardon the poor pictures.




      The above shot is the most accurate colour I could get, I guess.


      Can't really see, but pink selvedge!
      Selling for: USD 235, inclusive of shipping from Singapore Make a me a fair offer, and I will seriously consider!
      Drop me a pm with any questions! Thank you for looking.