Freewheelers, Bootleggers Reunion, Bubo, etc.

[shredwin_206 7,554]

Looks cool. I still prefer the 1927 I have though  

[Maynard Friedman 570,686]

I’m hoping they’ll release a 1931 model.

[Duke Mantee 14,747]

15 hours ago, Dr_Heech said:

Wonder why they chose the dates 1933-1934 in particular? Guess this one must've dodged the NRA tag.

 

In a lot of the write-ups they seem to be at pains to emphasise that around 1934 was the last we saw a rounded edge on the pocket flap (i.e. 1935) and that around 1934 the jackets had small engraved painted buttons (before that there was no engraving/embossing and after that the buttons were bigger) - so it’s a jacket that sits in a period of transition 

I’ve got a feeling Sushi has got his hands on, or owns, a jacket dated from that time - he has a huge collection, and apparently very friendly with some other serious collectors.

[Dr_Heech 568,537]

Interesting information, thanks @Duke Mantee

[MJF9 10,931]

^ thanks Duke

The 1933-34 jacket and the upcoming 1937 jeans have perked my interest, being a sucker for a crispy new tux

I'm keen to identify the differences between the 1933-34 and the 1927 version by FW... to see if it's worth buying the new jacket or just sitting this one out (it seems they are selling out pdq!)

I'll be missing stuff so anyone feel free to point out what

• The buttons remain small but are embossed now
• Curved pockets again
• The denim is new ("reddish") - any idea how it will fade? 
• A feature of the 1927 is the relatively wide sleeves.  Would be interested to know how the width of the 1933-34 sleeves compare (have asked for a view. Update: apparently also wide sleeves)

To try and gauge fit differences, I measured my own (washed and worn) 1927 and compared with the 1933-34 (raw and shrink sizes from a retailer)

Edited October 15, 2022 by MJF9
extra info!

[Duke Mantee 14,747]

I think you’ll be hard pushed to find significant differences between the 27 and the 33 models in terms of pattern. Small details that have been mentioned are key … and the denim itself which is new, so there’ll be no tangible information on fading but I wouldn’t have the slightest doubt about the quality of the fabric in any respect.

I’ve got the 27 model, I’ve got a war model and I’ve got a post war model (and Type IIs etc) so I’m not really all that interested because (broadly) I think I have each major iteration without trying to have a different Type I for every year they were produced - and anyway I don’t wear the jackets I own enough in the first place.

If you don’t have the 27 and are looking for that era of Type I then buy the 33 (and be quick); if you, generally, want a well made Type I then buy the 33; if you are in the same situation as me well now it’s down to hard cash and obsession.

Edited October 15, 2022 by Duke Mantee

[shredwin_206 7,554]

@MJF9 @Duke Mantee also keep in the mind the 27 has kind of short sleeves. I have long arms and they’re almost too short. Whenever it gets washed I hope it shrinks very little. 
Hoosier told me that the shorter length and wider arms on the 27 is typical of that era. 

[MJF9 10,931]

Yep, all good comments chaps  

I do like the sleeve width and the nuanced sleeve length on the 1927 version, including when there's some sweatshirt or other sleeve popping out a touch (tho get your point Shred)

Same boat more or less here Duke - the new denim is definitely of interest (planning to get the 1937 jeans so will experience that through them); however I hesitate a little on the length and the similarity with the 1927... Mavis on the supermarket checkout would need a super super keen eye to spot the difference .  If I didn't have the 1927 it'd be a slam dunk.

Now... looking again did encourage more than a sideways glance at the 506xx lot 2211004 - flapless pocket tick, dimensions double tick, denim treble tick... hmmmm...

Edited October 15, 2022 by MJF9

[Duke Mantee 14,747]

I’ve ordered the 37s for the sake of the denim - I was forced into it. Basically much like the Type I jackets the 37s and 22s are very similar - small details; red tab, no suspenders buttons etc; set them apart

[Broark 16,877]

52 minutes ago, Duke Mantee said:

I was forced into it. 

I tell my fiancé the same thing whenever a new pair shows up. 

[shredwin_206 7,554]

1927 jacket   
601b jeans
bonus shot of the nice roping happening on the 601b

[lee porter 401]

I can’t find the 37 jeans anywhere when are they due out? 

[Duke Mantee 14,747]

1 hour ago, lee porter said:

I can’t find the 37 jeans anywhere when are they due out? 

a few weeks yet - everything is still in the factory 

 

[lee porter 401]

Thanks duke 

[UkeNo 103,565]

Smaller size jungle fatigues arrived

Gone a bit overboard on cinching the hem but I’m really pleased with them. 

 

Also received the size 40 Deck worker jacket too. Much better fit. 

Edited October 21, 2022 by UkeNo

[shredwin_206 7,554]

FW 1927 
FW 601b

[MJF9 10,931]

601XXC 1937 coming through

https://www.instagram.com/p/CkDkDHNvAU3/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

Edited October 23, 2022 by MJF9

[JDelage 5,894]

They have an upcoming 2 color, plain front sweatshirt I'm really keen on... They haven't made one of those in several years and I think they look great.

[UkeNo 103,565]

.

Edited October 26, 2022 by UkeNo

[lee porter 401]

I’ll buy it 

[Jeef1 28]

Anyone buying the 1937 jeans? I’m a 34 in 1947 and s601xx and am tempted to get same size in 1937s, but a couple of size charts show them running larger than tag size. 

[Duke Mantee 14,747]

If your 47s and s601 are a 34 waist then your 37s will be a 34 … ALL my FW denims are 33 waist

Edited October 28, 2022 by Duke Mantee

[shredwin_206 7,554]

I agree. My 47 are 33 my S601xx are 33 my 43 are 33 and my 601b are 33. Take your normal size. 

[shredwin_206 7,554]

S601xx 2-3 weeks I think  love them but not a fan of the flannel pocket bags. Already have one developing a hole 

 

[Flash 251,509]

Got a couple freewheelers pieces a few days ago 

Wig Wag chore jacket 

Lovely lightweight denim , probably about 10oz ?? Dont really know , love the buttons too 

 

Forget the name of this vest 

 

Love the label , gives of a nice vintage Abercrombie and fitch vibe 

[Broark 16,877]

Nice pickups there Flash, I dig the vest but I've never really been a vest guy. Might have to change that someday.
I have a few things headed my way soon, I'll be sure to share once they arrive. 

[MJF9 10,931]

@Flash quality picks ups there Ryan.  Really like both that jacket and the Bridgeport vest.  The denim looks similar to the Ironalls jacket though (just looked it up) the Wig Wag is 8oz and the Ironalls a little more at 10oz.  The smaller collars look cool on the jacket and that weight will be great.  Would be good to see some fit pics mate whenever you get a chance.  Like Broak, I've got a few Freewheelers things on the way - they're relentlessly enticing!    

[fabes 41]

I also have some Freewheelers things heading my way. Relentlessly enticing indeed!

@Flash that chore coat looks great. 

[indigoeagle 960]

This year's denim is quite a bit neppy.
Has it been like this for a few years or just this year?

And the denim fabric is the same for the different jeans and jackets, only the dyeing differs, i.e. darker vs. more royal blue?

The denim of my 506 from 2013 is rough but doesn't have the nep, that the current denim has.
Apparently they're changing the denim.

[Duke Mantee 14,747]

8 hours ago, indigoeagle said:

This year's denim is quite a bit neppy.
Has it been like this for a few years or just this year?

And the denim fabric is the same for the different jeans and jackets, only the dyeing differs, i.e. darker vs. more royal blue?

The denim of my 506 from 2013 is rough but doesn't have the nep, that the current denim has.
Apparently they're changing the denim.

Both the jacket and jeans are the same denim (and I’m assuming the same dye … a reddish tone indigo) and this is a new denim, different from previous issues.