Warehouse

[exaptavist]

.

Edited October 8, 2015 by hoggreaser

[exaptavist]

.

Edited October 8, 2015 by hoggreaser

[k4727]

Two recent acquisitions plus larger photos from the lightning article on the new 1001s (i tried them both on in the store and prefer the old)

[demonator]

so what do you mean?

[k4727]

wider legs with a smaller waist size on the new one. It translates to a better fit for very skinny people, but looks absurdly baggy on a chunkier dude.

Edited April 8, 2013 by a.khan12390

[demonator]

ohhh bad

[Snake]

Thanks for posting the lightning article. I think you meant wider waist and slightly narrower knee and leg opening on the 1001. The current 1001xx has the smaller waist and wider knee and leg opening.

Edited April 8, 2013 by Snake

[aho]

a.khan, was the older 1001xx model just the 2012 model (red stitched on tab, "denim banner" denim and crooked pockets)?

[Snake]

Aho,

I believe this year's 1001xx is the same as last year's.

I actually like this change. It's cut more true to size like the older warehouse models.

[k4727]

a.khan, was the older 1001xx model just the 2012 model (red stitched on tab, "denim banner" denim and crooked pockets)?

Full honestly im not sure, the guy just pointed out old and new and i tried both. I thought he gave me the 1001 and then a 1001XX (2013) but now im not 100% sure.

[beautiful_FrEaK]

from that article you posted I also understood that the waist got bigger and the leg slimmer on the new model.

[setterman]

Two recent acquisitions plus larger photos from the lightning article on the new 1001s (i tried them both on in the store and prefer the old)

Love the bandanna! I wish they'd photographed those two guys wearing the right size. Those are at least one size too big.

[aho]

^Funny, that's exactly how I like to wear mine!

[ulu]

Sz 32 1003XX test sample - about 20 months of wear... A few washes...

Crotch All Gone...

[Maynard Friedman]

What's this thread doing on page 2?!

Just started wearing my Warrens today (purchased as one wash in 2009). I had them hemmed an inch and gave them another 30C machine wash and they're just right. They have the 1000XX oxidised denim, which is incredibly comfortable and definitely feels like it has some give to it. Does all Warehouse denim have this stretchy feeling? Anyway, I'm very happy with them.

On another note, I've been informed that my Lot 415s arrived from Japanholic this morning - they're essentially rebranded 700s, so I'm looking forward to unwrapping those when I get home. I only ordered them on Sunday night and they were detained briefly in Customs, so I'm very impressed with the shipping speed.

No more jeans for me, ever. No, I really mean it this time...

EDIT:

Lot 415 raw measurements (BiG style):

- Size 32

- Waist 34

- Front rise 12

- Thigh 13

- Hem 9

- Inseam 35.75

These are exactly the same as BiGs raw Lot700 measurements for a size 32.

Edited April 19, 2013 by Maynard Friedman

[setterman]

Congrats on the 415s, and glad to hear the inseam worked out good on the Warrens.

My experience with Warehouse denim is limited to the 1001XX (15th) and 1000XX used in the 700 and 800. They're very much alike in weight, feel, and how they wear, and have that slightly stretchy feeling. They will pretty easily give at the waist, especially while wet.

[Capsicum Fried Meat]

Why do I love Warehouse Co. products so mush?

Because they are true to size and I never bother choosing right size. Plus, they are really comfortable when wearing.

I don't like low rise skinny jeans. Yeah, Warehouse jeans meet all my requirements.

[Snake]

Maynard Friedman,

I 've been wearing my warren for 9 months now and finally seeing some nice progress. The oxidized denim does stretch a bit like other Warehouse denim.

[Foxy2]

Button-down shirt

[coleslawyum]

X-Post

Warehouse Versus Evisu.

[aho]

^at a loss for words...slaw, your pairs in particular always seem to let the fabric speak for themselves if that makes any sense...

[Maynard Friedman]

^^ Cole's fades are something else - a slaw unto themselves!

[claes]

These are my WH 1000XX, the 2011 edition with a 6x6 weave. Probably at somewhere around 5 months of effective wear and 5-6 washes/soaks. First japanese jeans for me, can't see myself going back to anything else now... Sorry about the poor pictures, but the color and contrast is pretty accurate.

I like the fit, but they were actually at least one size too small from the beginning and I've gained some weight since then. The seams on two of the button holes have ripped because of the strain over the top block and the middle seam at the back is also starting to come apart. The denim has stretched a lot though, the waist has never been an issue.

[aho]

^gonna need some close up pics! ;D

[coleslawyum]

Thanks! Warehouse fades are regularly epic.

[claes]

Ok, decided to take some detail pics with a proper camera The iphone was better at capturing the real color though, they are not as bright in real life.

Last pic is of the teared back seam. Won't be wearing these til I get that fixed and lose some weight...

[aho]

great stuff chyl...the 1000xx's will always be "the one that got away" for me, it's good to finally see a broken in pair!

[garden gnomes in space]

you guys are killing it with the Warehouse. A pair is still on my radar, and at some point I will "justify" the need to get a pair.

[Maynard Friedman]

Like aho, I have 4 pairs of Warehouse (Warren x2, 1001XX 15th anniversary and now the 415), which I've collected over the last 4 years and I've just started wearing a pair of the Warrens.

I love the denim and the cut and am not sure how any of my pairs from other brands will get a look in now!

[alexx1976]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_uHMBDn8HY&feature=youtu.be

FH Cap

FH Wabash 7012W

Iron Heart 705

Adidas