Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

S710 redhawk 29/32

fit pict

stack

1472008_10202343082679936_609362900_n.jp

1469978_10202343082559933_1904797631_n.j

 

double cuff

1454862_10202343082719937_1212522072_n.j

599666_10202343083679961_484275924_n.jpg

1456534_10202343083319952_1470711119_n.j

Posted

@ kaskade: I can't really compare the 710 to something else but otherwise you seem to have the right idea. most people can go down 1 size for a slimmer fit.

 

@redstar. My tagged size 33 710XX started at 34" raw and after a year are at about 34.75". If you want a final actual waist of 34" then definetly don't do a tagged 31, and honestly, even a tagged 32 is going to be a bit of a squeeze. I'd actually say 33 for a slimmer look, 34 for maximum comfort.

 

 

@redstar: if you would have told me in your PM that your SExFHxRJB now measure 34" in the waist I wouldn't have recommended you the size 31 in the 710. But you never did ;)

 

Because of that I'm with the the other guys. Size 32 would be doable since you can stretch the waist easily 1" beyond raw measurements, But the construction may suffer. The size 33 would be the safer route. All depends on the fit you are after :)

Thank you!

Posted

Definitely cuff. A clean break at the bottom looks so much better than stacking with a larger leg opening.

Posted

bradl & B-sandy

thanks for the advice  :)

Posted

I would really have a hard time with a job not allowing me to wear jeans, I would feel somewhat naked with out them.

Posted

I would really have a hard time with a job not allowing me to wear jeans, I would feel somewhat naked with out them.

I at least get to wear them nights weekends and Fridays.

Posted

Kicked off my weekend with my perfect fitting 510s. Everything is lovely. The exact fit I was looking for save for the length. The hem could come in a bit at just barely under 9 but whateves. From the rise on the top block to the thighs from the knee down is so comfy. Gonna try and stretch the waist a bit. I'm sure it won't be a problem. I'm psyched though. Yee

Gonna get my homie to flick up some pics ala SLR. Stay tuned

Posted
Greetings from Xiamen, China

L1016078_zps25d79afe.jpg

 

Finally, I found some time to take proper daylight pictures!

L1016079_zps21a745d2.jpg

L1016081_zps446f9b77.jpg

L1016082_zps2a03386b.jpg

 

you will notice some crazy leg twist...

L1016083_zps28e7cb45.jpg

L1016084_zps4fc7b9c2.jpg

L1016085_zpsa407b9b0.jpg

L1016086_zpsd44e305a.jpg
Posted (edited)
the denim is very coarse & slubby

L1016087_zpsb9f4e9f7.jpg

 

exposed rivets everywhere...

L1016088_zps70420b96.jpg

L1016089_zpsde827222.jpg

 

...and a cinch on the back

L1016090_zpsd5e90fde.jpg

 

this shows how crazy the leg twist really is!

L1016091_zps217cff35.jpg

L1016092_zpsf55a3469.jpg

Edited by Foxy2
Posted
overall fit pic...
L1016094_zps86a7862b.jpg
 
...and some clos-ups.
L1016095_zps672eb93b.jpg
L1016096_zpsd67ed231.jpg
L1016097_zpsade91fc5.jpg
L1016098_zps7c249057.jpg
 

(in case anybody is wondering - we are talking S526VX-L-15th here...)

Posted

Foxy2 thanks for all the pics, they are definitely a good bit more "full" than I was anticipating. I'm not so sure that cut will work for me, but I still want a pair. :D :D :D

Posted

vQXSOrC.jpg

 

Don't have my camera on me till next week, so won't get any good pictures until then. But this thing is bloody heavy! 

 

Y5OHAqL.jpg?1

Posted

^great choice.  I would have preferred the type II to the type III but I purchased it early in my denim obsession and wasn't comfortable ordering from rakuten or doing a special order from BiG, in case I needed to return it.

Posted (edited)

I think max or b_f said a while back ago that leg twisting is apparently desirable. Why is that? To me personally, I find it a bit annoying :)

Edited by Chubacca
Posted

The Leg twist adds to the irregularity. I spent a good 900$ to find out I don't like sanforized denim.

Off topic and random. I have my 510s right where I want them. Everything but the hem is @9in. If I soak from the knee down will the color be offf?

Posted

Bf

I figured that. Worried about machine washing and the waist coming in too far. From your fit guide it looks like a machine wash the only way. BTW they are the 15oz size 34. Maybe ill just deal.

Posted

^great choice.  I would have preferred the type II to the type III but I purchased it early in my denim obsession and wasn't comfortable ordering from rakuten or doing a special order from BiG, in case I needed to return it.

Yeah, I had a type III gap 1969 raw jacket from like 5 years ago that I have been wearing until I got this. Not a huge fan of Type III as well, this type II is awesome, I just wish it had hand pockets.

Posted

Bf

I figured that. Worried about machine washing and the waist coming in too far. From your fit guide it looks like a machine wash the only way. BTW they are the 15oz size 34. Maybe ill just deal.

 

I wore my S0510XX yesterday and I measured the hem, just a hair under 9" and I machine washed them once for initial shrinkage. I don't expect much more shrinkage

Posted

Yeah, I had a type III gap 1969 raw jacket from like 5 years ago that I have been wearing until I got this. Not a huge fan of Type III as well, this type II is awesome, I just wish it had hand pockets.

 

If it had hand pockets it wouldn't be a real Type II.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...