Acronym.

[piece keeper 5,060]

https://acrnm.com/sizing

14 minutes ago, junkie_dolphin said:

How does one size pants? I've heard that one should size for length, but is this always true?

It's not always true, but since sizing is S, M, L each will cover a range of waist sizes, therefore waist isn't as much a constraint.  Sizing for length is definitely advisable when you see waist measurements that seem to make no sense, e.g. P23TS-S had some wild waist measurement of 50+cm across...obviously too large by any normal means, so this should clue you in that these pants are intentionally wide and require significant belting at the waist.  For these types of pants, look at the length more than anything since the waist is intentionally large at any size.

[AvantSol 686]

Yeah I'm about 5' 8" and finding that itis very dependent on material and style type. Generally I hear if they are 'normal' style trousers you go tts while baggier items is "size for length".

I have a pair of p10 DS in medium, they fit fine. They are just a little long on me but are good when I pull them up. While my ch pair fit perfectly length and  don't need to pull them too high. And I find the CH material to look a little slimmer. But then again there could be a bunch of factors; washing, seasonal alterations(if any) etc.

Now for 23s I have to get a small because they are way too long for me for a medium and look ridiculous when I rise them.

Edited April 11, 2018 by AvantSol

[Z-11 102]

1 hour ago, AvantSol said:

Yeah I'm about 5' 8" and finding that itis very dependent on material and style type. Generally I hear if they are 'normal' style trousers you go tts while baggier items is "size for length".

I agree with AvantSol. I have three different pairs of p23 in different sizes and materials. p23-s (S) looks good, but they are not very convenient (tensed in calves), p23ts-ch (XL) are long enough and wide. p23a-ds (L) are perfect. 
Also I had p10ts-ds (L) and they were long. Stretched knees below the knees looked particularly ugly. Surprisingly, but the same size in p10a-s (L) looks good.

PS I'm 5'11"

[Toilettebun 107]

With acronym pants it's advisable to know how you want the pants to fit exactly. The different material choices greatly vary the fit which is attributed to each individual material's properties as @Z-11 illustrated above. 

[Kamikaze 3,871]

1 hour ago, Z-11 said:

I agree with AvantSol. I have three different pairs of p23 in different sizes and materials. p23-s (S) looks good, but they are not very convenient (tensed in calves), p23ts-ch (XL) are long enough and wide. p23a-ds (L) are perfect. 
Also I had p10ts-ds (L) and they were long. Stretched knees below the knees looked particularly ugly. Surprisingly, but the same size in p10a-s (L) looks good.

PS I'm 5'11"

I’m surprised that all the fits look fine no matter the size. 

[Micx 8]

11 hours ago, Z-11 said:

I agree with AvantSol. I have three different pairs of p23 in different sizes and materials. p23-s (S) looks good, but they are not very convenient (tensed in calves), p23ts-ch (XL) are long enough and wide. p23a-ds (L) are perfect. 
Also I had p10ts-ds (L) and they were long. Stretched knees below the knees looked particularly ugly. Surprisingly, but the same size in p10a-s (L) looks good.

PS I'm 5'11"

All looks really good, but L is sick! Im a few cm taller than you, so I guess L is my size if I were to buy p23.

[Yan90 228]

Im 5'10", 80-82 kg.  P10 fits ok only in S for this height. Thas why in L size they looks ugly (articulated knees are in the wrong position). P10 DS in medium looks bad, but in size S - perfect.

CH defenetly isnt looks slimmer than DS. Cuz of more dense material CH have more pronounced and "rigid" stacks.

[lxkhor 86]

11 hours ago, Yan90 said:

Im 5'10", 80-82 kg.  P10 fits ok only in S for this height. Thas why in L size they looks ugly (articulated knees are in the wrong position). P10 DS in medium looks bad, but in size S - perfect.

CH defenetly isnt looks slimmer than DS. Cuz of more dense material CH have more pronounced and "rigid" stacks.

This is weird. I am the same height and weight and Medium fits perfect for me in P10-DS. 

[wexler 627]

3 hours ago, lxkhor said:

This is weird. I am the same height and weight and Medium fits perfect for me in P10-DS. 

All about your inseam length instead of actual height IMO. It better determines where the hem on cropped pants or articulation on the knees will hit. I'm 5' 10" but have shorter legs. Size small P23-S below: 

Edited April 13, 2018 by wexler

[Yan90 228]

6 hours ago, lxkhor said:

This is weird. I am the same height and weight and Medium fits perfect for me in P10-DS. 

Just try size s and compare with m. No doudt size will fit better than m especially for -DS. 

For reference. P10ts-ds in M looks on me like on Lenny (foto from SS18), but S size - like on Ian. Defenetly the second one fits better. I have an athletic build with "normal" leg length.

[paper2k1 2]

Does anyone have info about ACRONYM® SS18 drop?

and can anyone tell me retail price of j47-ws(new to SS18?) 

Edited April 15, 2018 by paper2k1

[kraak 429]

4 hours ago, paper2k1 said:

Does anyone have info about ACRONYM® SS18 drop?

and can anyone tell me retail price of j47-ws(new to SS18?) 

Consult your local village shaman for drop infos.

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20180131113553/https://acrnm.com/

[sportello 15]

We're already pushing the envelope in terms of release date, so who knows? Could be September the way things are looking.

[kraak 429]

itshappening.gif

 

https://twitter.com/erlsn/status/985875242064244737

[undercover73 2,258]

anyone got any product info or idea of drop time. My god can this be designed to make it anymore stressful for people?

 

[undercover73 2,258]

thanks man

 

 

[TEKsevenZERO 3,577]

Would like a P17 but I imagine that horse bolted long ago, be interesting to see a TS version too, bring back a pair of super loose BDU shorts ! 

 

I'm not sure I'll even be able to see what's for sale as I finish work at that time, by the time I get home it'll all have vanished...

I'll live vicariously through this thread, fill your boots folks!!

[meccaNIZM 432]

[JoseRizal 108]

The shorts looks pretty cool

[hiei 32]

Sold out  

is this a new a AVM cw? 

[Kasper 50,797]

I got some p10S from the SS16 drop, just checked the receipt and they were 485 EUR. Now at ~1,200 EUR, it's an almost 3x markup over just 2 years. Are you fucking kidding me!!! Pricing is so out of sync with value, I just cannot even remotely justify looking at ACR now. Goodbye, it's been fun while it lasted, but there's just no way...  

[eel_jah 75]

Bald man fully lost it with those prices 

[undercover73 2,258]

wheres everything else? will there be more dropped on the site now or is that it?

[eidolarr 243]

Whew I got ahold of the J1A in S, those went fast. Never owned paclite so I'm curious to see how it compares to the rest of the goretex lineup.

[undercover73 2,258]

is that it for now? waiting for more items, will there more dropped on the site now?

[junkie_dolphin 563]

J1A... increase the price... make it in paclite... wtf...?

[kraak 429]

Acronym went from street to luxe.

 

Also: 

 

[drgitlin 9,415]

Out of interest, how much was the new J1A?

€1200 for trousers and >€800 for a sweatshirt is just bonkers. Glad I got my P24As a couple of years ago because I doubt I'm ever buying another pair of acronym pants at those prices.

[undercover73 2,258]

I

I was waiting for these pants, they not in this drop?

[drgitlin 9,415]

1 minute ago, kraak said:

Acronym went from street to luxe.

 

Also: 

 

Yours for a reasonable €8000, I guess.