Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Nothing wrong with an unprovoked opinion, that's why we're here right? ^_^
I'll try to get an updated fit pic today if I decide to wear them, you're saying you'd go for one less cuff but bigger?
I think they'd be ideal with about 2 inches taken off the inseam.

Posted
On 9/18/2019 at 3:38 AM, Broark said:

First day wearing the 43's and I feel like they're almost too baggy.  Front looks good, back (top block) looks really big.
LN87bmn.jpg

Measurements pls 

Posted
On 9/18/2019 at 5:38 AM, Broark said:

First day wearing the 43's and I feel like they're almost too baggy.  Front looks good, back (top block) looks really big.
LN87bmn.jpg

I've seen your fit pics across a few different threads, have to say those fit you the best. Really good fit, don't worry bout the saggy ass, that's just how FW fit.

Posted

Thanks! The saggy butt has already my girlfriend calling me “diaper butt” so that’s cool. :o

Posted

Here's your measurements Ed. 

Waist: 36 in.
Front rise: 13 in.
Back rise: 18 in.
Thigh: 14 in.
Knee: 10 in.
Hem: 9 in.
Inseam: 34 in.

Posted

The diaper butt is always an issue with vintage cuts 

they’re not flattering to the backside 

Posted (edited)

Yea my FW 1947 have crazy hip flare since they’re still pretty new. 

It just makes the saggy bottom even worse. Need to break them in. Haha 

Honestly out of all my denim Roy, WH Ranch, Wrangler, Left Field, etc 

My wife says that the wrangler and Mister Freedom are really the only ones that look good from the back....haha 

Edited by ecsong187
Posted (edited)

I know you’ve been dying to see my rear in jeans, so here’s what my FW43s look like from the back:

OVgLPlR.jpg

Edited by Iron Horse
Posted
1 hour ago, ecsong187 said:

The diaper butt is always an issue with vintage cuts 

Deadlifting should help.

Posted

Nah. Been lifting for years. It’s just the cut of the jeans. Haha 

Posted
10 hours ago, ecsong187 said:

Looks a lot better than my rear in the 47s! Haha 

Now that I look in the mirror, the diaper butt is more pronounced when I’m standing up normally. But I really don’t mind it or hip flare; I just embrace the repro look. B)

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Very nice mate , was your pair that convinced me to buy a pair years ago ..... but then conners convinced me to sell them , if I'm honest I kind of regret it because they were lovely jeans 

Posted
29 minutes ago, Double 0 Soul said:

I should probably apologise for all the money ive cost you Ryan..

Here's a fit pic of the 47's

IMG_5755

 

No need , I'd have only spent it on magic beans anyway 

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

The 661ZXX, AFAIK; before that it was the 1951 601XX.

Of the top of my head, it goes, from straightest to slimmest:

1947 -> 1943 -> 1951 -> 661ZXX

 

Edited by Iron Horse

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...