Jump to content

Conners Sewing Factory


Flash

Recommended Posts

  On 4/30/2020 at 10:25 AM, dudewuttheheck said:

Wow those look incredible @Flash

Two years isn't bad at all. Mine have held up very well construction-wise so far after 2 and a half years. The fabric has been the weak spot with mine.

Expand  

Your waiting on the 42's aren't you ? 

Really liked the look of those but was a bit confused what the difference was to the 41's ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 4/30/2020 at 10:32 AM, Flash said:

Your waiting on the 42's aren't you ? 

Really liked the look of those but was a bit confused what the difference was to the 41's ? 

Expand  

Yeah I'm waiting on the Dawn Knight 42's. I actually don't know too much about his 41s. The reason I went with these was because he had an actual pair to go off of with these (maybe he had one for the 41s as well, but I'm not sure.) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 4/30/2020 at 10:34 AM, dudewuttheheck said:

Yeah I'm waiting on the Dawn Knight 42's. I actually don't know too much about his 41s. The reason I went with these was because he had an actual pair to go off of with these (maybe he had one for the 41s as well, but I'm not sure.) 

Expand  

Yeah Jukebox vintage supplied the vintage pair for the 41's 

The only difference I know of for the 42's is the flasher stating "Original riveted" as opposed to "copper riveted" , so it must have been early 42 when the change was made to copper coated rivets 

Edited by Flash
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 4/30/2020 at 10:39 AM, Flash said:

Yeah Jukebox vintage supplied the vintage pair for the 41's 

The only difference I know of for the 42's is the flasher stating "Original riveted" as opposed to "copper riveted" , so it must have been early 42 when the change was made to copper coated rivets 

Expand  

Yeah I believe he said that this was a very short period of only a couple months or so. I think he even stated roughly what time of the year it was, but I'll have to go back and check again.

Do you know where he got the 42s?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 4/30/2020 at 10:46 AM, Flash said:

No idea , it was through those vintage meetups he was hosting/attending but it wasn't stated who the owner was 

Expand  

Ah too bad. I also wish the translations made more sense in the videos. Maybe I'll ask him again when I finally get them :P 

Edited by dudewuttheheck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My jacket is coming up to a year and only washed it twice at the start before wearing. Not decided on whether to give it a birthday wash yet. The look of your jeans makes it more tempting though.

Edited by MJF9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 4/30/2020 at 11:12 PM, dudewuttheheck said:

I just got an answer on the eta for my jeans. He said autumn for mine so I'll be waiting almost a year for my D42 total.

Expand  

tbh, i'm only looking for a pair, not too fussed about the details. quite like the M-46 or 47 i see from the website..

Edited by louisbosco
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like promised, updated fit pictures of my Conner's. Both are size 38. The '47 have more wears and washes, the WW2 one initial wash and a handful of wears I think.

 

WW2

20200501_161456.thumb.jpg.4c3b6cd74b90d1d5f6f5dbd8b0d280d4.jpg20200501_161506.thumb.jpg.b9f868088a4f7ca87321268d8b29d191.jpg20200501_161533.thumb.jpg.a75ccbda0469ed187825c509c359c00c.jpg

 

'47

20200501_161808.thumb.jpg.48c9641529cceb18356b63ee31a2ca60.jpg20200501_161837.thumb.jpg.9ee3b1448709bbc3ee33da9bfc410eb6.jpg20200501_161844.thumb.jpg.8907986e93ac1736cb6d6a91050eeabe.jpg

 

The 47 are still okay and I might get the waist to shrink a bit more but the WW2 just feel huge all over 

Edited by beautiful_FrEaK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got a stash of Lysol wipes to help sweeten the deal. :ph34r:
Here's some photos of my 2nd half 46's in their current state. Honestly I don't wear these much anymore as I find the fit strange. The waist is big but the hips are tight, making the front pockets nearly unusable. I put a good year of wear into these I think. They could use a few repairs, just small things here and there. They're still sound constructionally.
If these had a little more room in the hips they'd probably be my favorite fitting pair of jeans.
EpdoVe5.jpg
eV3WSMD.jpg
QzKqVbk.jpg
uMU9cCc.jpg
CnbNVRU.jpg
yWHaoy6.jpg
ac4gOki.jpg
TUb94an.jpg
8CO67Gq.jpg
hTqFym4.jpg
wMHQUj0.jpg
nXpPTYa.jpg
OHPh574.jpg
FUiYXiM.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 5/1/2020 at 6:42 PM, beautiful_FrEaK said:

Like promised, updated fit pictures of my Conner's. Both are size 38. The '47 have more wears and washes, the WW2 one initial wash and a handful of wears I think.

 

WW2

20200501_161456.thumb.jpg.4c3b6cd74b90d1d5f6f5dbd8b0d280d4.jpg20200501_161506.thumb.jpg.b9f868088a4f7ca87321268d8b29d191.jpg

 

The 47 are still okay and I might get the waist to shrink a bit more but the WW2 just feel huge all over 

Expand  

I think those would look fantastic after a few years of wear - the drape would be very old timey 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...