RESOLUTE by hayashi-san!

[Sugar Mountain]

Mine, lost count of washed and at about 9 months

 

Love the major leg-twist.

Edited March 10, 2016 by Sugar Mountain

[lsaylor]

Mr. Bielby, they look great. Did you go TTS on these? 

[mandel9000]

Mandel here are my post wash measurements BIG way-

W- 31, R- 11.25, BR- 15, UT- 11.75, K-8.25, LO- 7.75, Inseam-28

Thanks! Leg opening is bigger than I expected, but good measurements. Let me know if you consider selling those to get a smaller size. Inseam would probably be high-water on me, but I kind of dig that style at the moment.

[alvin_cheong]

I actually like that fit. Better than having a ''hungry bum'' and a strained button fly when they're too tight. The diaper fit will settle in time as the denim molds to your shape and softens. I do think you could clean up the fit a little by making the cuff bigger though.

Could you define"hungry bum"? Lol...

[Mr-Bielby]

I'm generally a 33-34 in most jeans. These are a 34 to account for the thigh. Waist is a bit big.

Most of my jeans are 17" measured big style once stretched. These do stretch.

Edited March 11, 2016 by Mr-Bielby

[lsaylor]

Thanks! Leg opening is bigger than I expected, but good measurements. Let me know if you consider selling those to get a smaller size. Inseam would probably be high-water on me, but I kind of dig that style at the moment.

That is good to know, I just did a warm wash and I will see if they stretch out too much. The leg opening on these is weird. They measure 7.75 but fit and look like a 7.25. That is what I was saying about Hayashi's fit. I was wondering if he had them tapered because they look like such a small lo when you consider what the measurements are.

[Max Power]

Hayashi is one o the skinniest guys out there. I guess he's wearing them as small as he can.

[bod]

That is good to know, I just did a warm wash and I will see if they stretch out too much. The leg opening on these is weird. They measure 7.75 but fit and look like a 7.25. That is what I was saying about Hayashi's fit. I was wondering if he had them tapered because they look like such a small lo when you consider what the measurements are.

 

 

7.75" sounds a bit big for that waist size, even my W33 were about 7.5" maybe try a 60c machine wash with high spin approx 1400rpm to shrink them in more.

Edited March 11, 2016 by bod

[lsaylor]

I will measure them again. I did not want to undo the cuff because I am trying to set it. I measured right above the cuff.

[garden gnomes in space]

I'm generally a 33-34 in most jeans. These are a 34 to account for the thigh. Waist is a bit big.

Most of my jeans are 17" measured big style once stretched. These do stretch.

whats the upper thigh measure?

[Mr-Bielby]

I get 12" from this angle

[Maynard Friedman]

^ That's what she said!

Looks like 12.5" to me.

[garden gnomes in space]

I dont think the 710 would work for me.  Upper thigh is too slim.  Ive tried to find reliable measurements of the 711, anyone have any luck with that?  

[Mr-Bielby]

I have a pair in 34.

Any good to you?

[Maynard Friedman]

Post the measurements please Mr Bielby.

[garden gnomes in space]

yes absolutely.  Please post measurements when you can!

[Mr-Bielby]

Freshly washed, there is stretch to go.

Waist 17"

FR 11"

BR 15"

Thigh 13"

Inseam and LO not measured as I had them shortened and tapered. From memory the LO was approximately 9"

[garden gnomes in space]

ahhhh, the rise is just a bit to low for me.  otherwise a perfect cut!  thanks Mr Bielby

[alvin_cheong]

Day 20 of wearing

 

 

 

Edited March 22, 2016 by alvin_cheong

[alvin_cheong]

1st time posting and forgive the outcome of the photos. :blink:

Edited March 22, 2016 by alvin_cheong

[ranonranonarat]

i picked up a pair of these a couple of weeks back before my trip to japan. got the W33 L28 from rakuten store C.Point. rakuten was running a small promo during the time so financially it made the most sense to me.

have been wearing them for approx a week or so and my first impressions on these to follow below.

1) the fit is great for me, i was looking for something slim in the leg as i already have a couple of fuller cut jeans. the leg opening measures 8 inches on these (seems to be big based on some of your standards) but slim enough for my liking.

2) they feel like a more modern representation of a 66 cut given the thighs are a little narrower than what i thought they might be but will work if you're not heavy in the thighs. you will have better luck looking for a more accurate 60's cut elsewhere if you're into the details. but that being said, these are in no way a "bad" representation. just different.

3) they same to be pretty fast fading to me to be honest. i've had about 8 actual days of wear into these and there has been some noticeable wear already, mainly close to the back rise and some whiskering. was pretty surprised it took so little time.

pictures and measurements to follow shortly when i get some better lighting.

Edited April 3, 2016 by ranonranonarat

[ranonranonarat]

here are the measurements for a W33L28 post wash

waist: 16.75 inches

front rise: 11.5 inches

back rise: 16 inches

upper thigh: 12.5 inches

knee: 8.75 inches

leg opening: 8 inches

inseam: 26.25 inches

Edited April 3, 2016 by ranonranonarat

[beautiful_FrEaK]

Damn..8 days you say?

And thanks for the measurements

[ranonranonarat]

yeah, 8 days, i'm surprised myself, never had anything move indigo this fast... will be interesting to see how these will turn out.

[Mr-Bielby]

I feel that they kinda go fast at the start then plateau. Good to see more people getting these now.

[alvin_cheong]

Wow, 8 days and you got this achievement. Nice. I wore it for a month.. I can only see slight fade to it. You must have took the jeans for a beating ya?

[baldy]

how do the 710's compare to SC66?  They are my favorite jeans right now but am looking for something a little slimmer.  My 34 is good in the waist and pretty relaxed everywhere else

[Max Power]

What do your SC 66 measure?

[baldy]

I only found these from Rakuten, I am getting them repaired right now at SE so I cannot measure them for a couple weeks...

 

Select a size Guide
Size notation
Inch  West  Length  Front rise  After the rise  Cotton リ幅  Hem width
29     72 cm  89 cm  29 cm        37 cm  27.5 cm  19 cm
30     74 cm  89 cm  30 cm        37.5 cm  28.5 cm  19.5 cm
31     76 cm  89 cm  30.5 cm     38 cm  29 cm  19.5 cm
32     78 cm  89 cm  31 cm        38.5 cm  29.5 cm  20 cm
33     80 cm  89 cm  31.5 cm     39 cm  30 cm  20.5 cm
34     82 cm  89 cm  32 cm        40 cm  30.5 cm  21 cm
36     87 cm  89 cm  32.5 cm     42.5 cm  32 cm  22.5 cm
38     91 cm  89 cm  33 cm        43.5 cm  33.5 cm  23 cm

[setterman]

how do the 710's compare to SC66?  They are my favorite jeans right now but am looking for something a little slimmer.  My 34 is good in the waist and pretty relaxed everywhere else

I haven't encountered any other brand of jeans that fits similar to the SC66 (other than maybe MF's Lot 64).  It's a tough cut to pull off, with the narrow waist and full cut everywhere else.  Just about everything else you'll look at is going to be slimmer.  I haven't gone looking for the 710's measurements to compare, but I'd expect in the same tagged size the 710 will have up to an inch less rise and thigh compared to the SC66.