Warehouse

[SLAB]

Finally started wearing my 15th 1001xx , they seem to be the perfect pair for coming summer; together with my 660,s that will mean this summer will be WH exclusively. Wife is not digging the 15th much because she thinks they are too wide for my slim legs but hey; what does she knows anyway

just need to pick up a pair of decent shoes from Alden or Church, roll the jeans and im ready to go

[setterman]

Finally started wearing my 15th 1001xx , they seem to be the perfect pair for coming summer;

Nice! Though my experience with the 1001XX last summer was that they were like wearing denim armor. We get very humid weather where I live, and I found myself getting sweaty real quick in them. Even though they're lighter weight than the 1000XX denim, they weave seems tighter and doesn't want to breath.

[jaspar]

It seems the New 1001XX and the 15th 1001XX have the same silhouette. Here is the same model wearing a size 30 in both 1001XX models (Porky's website)

I studied these on the Porky's site a few days ago too, since I wanted to also see if there was any fit differences. I actually think the pics of the front of the jeans are actually, sadly the same. The creasing and indenting line up exactly. Altho maybe the fact that Porky's felt they didn't need different photos connotes just how identical are the 2 fits.

[PeterParker]

From Hinoya:

Measurements are similar, but not the same.

[Snake]

Jaspar - Good eye. I din't even notice that. I was focusing on the back fit pics.

PeterParker - Porky’s and OTE show both models have the same measurements yet Hinoya shows there’s a difference. I wonder if the Porky’s and OTE even measured the new 1001 or just assume they are the same and posts 15th measurements. Then again, measuring jeans can be tricky if it’s not done right.

[Anders Helseth]

Cross-post from Osaka Showdown thread.

@4~ months, 2 machines washes, 2 soaks. They've become really soft.

Picture 4 (below) is true to colour (on my screen).

Barrage of photos:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Hope you enjoyed.

[jstavrin]

Does anyone have any info on the 1003xx anniversary model? How does the fit compare to the 1001xx? I know the denim is different (darker, yes?), which has me interested in them. I may have found a pair in my size, but the provided measurements aren't nearly as comprehensive enough to give me a good sense of the fit.

[jstavrin]

Well, I bought them. Rather excited to have my first pair of Warehouse denim. I'll be finishing out the summer with my Denime XX, however.

[DocBlue]

Well, I bought them. Rather excited to have my first pair of Warehouse denim. I'll be finishing out the summer with my Denime XX, however.

i got 1001 xx .... if its the same fabric, its the best i ve ever had.

[aho]

jstarv, please post pics when you get them...the 1003XX is sorely unrepresented on here! To clarify Doc, they are actually different denim...

[jstavrin]

^Sure thing. A bit of a hiccup in the process due to the seller not willing to sell them to me due to the tab and my being located in the US, presumably. Sharp Service is making it happen for me now.

[DocBlue]

Just received my billykenman. Pics to come

[setterman]

Was looking at various Warehouse models yesterday, and I'd forgotten all about the 15th Anniv. 1001ZXX. Did anyone here get a pair of them? The fly is pretty puckery on the button models, and I wonder how the zip models made out. Noticed the Z model has an offset rear belt loop, wish they'd done that on the button fly model.

[aho]

^They were a pretty cool pair that (I believe) came with NOS zippers...I doubt they sold out/sold very many, I wonder who still has some in stock?

[arya_triad]

hi all, i'm looking to get the new 1001xx. Could someone who has either the new or 15th anniv. 1001x tell me the post-wash inseam length? (iirc they're made with the same denim?) I'm not sure whether to get them hemmed or not.

Thanks

[SLAB]

i got my pair of 15th 1001xx from japan unhemmed; inseam measured 32.75" after a first machine wash (40 degrees celsius) and 32" after the second wash (same temperature).

[Snake]

My 15th 1001xx's inseam is 32.75" after 6 handwashes.

[jstavrin]

I've received word that my 1003xx arrived today. Pics either later tonight or tomorrow. I have a strong feeling they'll end up being too small, but we'll see.

[arya_triad]

i got my pair of 15th 1001xx from japan unhemmed; inseam measured 32.75" after a first machine wash (40 degrees celsius) and 32" after the second wash (same temperature).

My 15th 1001xx's inseam is 32.75" after 6 handwashes.

Thanks! +rep

[jstavrin]

I'll take pictures later today, but I'm not sure how I feel about the 1003 fit. They're great along the thigh, but the rise is a bit lower than I'm used to. Maybe I'll get used to it.

EDIT: It probably has something to do with the sized up 2 Denime XX I'm wearing now...

[jstavrin]

Shitty picture, but you get the idea. Does the rise seem low to anyone else, or have I been brainwashed by Denime?

[jaspar]

Not in the least. Also great fit.

[aho]

I see what you mean about the rise but I don't think it's a bad fit...Keep em!

[jstavrin]

Not in the least. Also great fit.

I see what you mean about the rise but I don't think it's a bad fit...Keep em!

What to do, what to do...These aren't really going to be worn until after summer anyway so I have time to think about it.

[shinobi2000]

Shitty picture, but you get the idea. Does the rise seem low to anyone else, or have I been brainwashed by Denime?

did u hem them already or is that how long they are?

[jstavrin]

No hem. I have fairly long legs, and I gave them a hot wash, so they're probably pretty well-shrunk.

[DocBlue]

2002

1001 .... first wear in 6mo.... i love those jeans. stil my prefered ones

[josh mullen]

No hem. I have fairly long legs, and I gave them a hot wash, so they're probably pretty well-shrunk.

Length is great, as is the overall fit. I'd agree that the rise is too low, but what can you do? I used to dislike the relative lowness of the rise on my 800s, which resulted in me wearing them only infrequently, but I've since grown to except this particular feature.

[jstavrin]

The strange thing is that i've compared the rise measurements to other cuts, and it's totally comparable to something like the 47 in the same size. I don't get it.

[aho]

^I take what I said earlier back...You buggin, that is a perfect fit! I think the only reason the rise seemed shorter in the first pic is because of the size of the belt...Seriously, I would keep them and beat them into submission...