Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

The Birner shirt.
I had seen it before a few weeks ago, when it was released.. But - as is often the case- with some fit pics one gets a better idea of how it looks.
The fit pic of this VMC guy shows it quite well. It will apparently show strong vertical fading. Denim description: "Vintage Style 8.5oz Indigo [Denim]
The warp threads use strongly uneven pure indigo yarn, and the weft threads use well-balanced uneven yarn, dyed with natural dyes, resulting in a twill weave that allows you to enjoy a strong vertical fade.
It features a moderately stiff 8.5 oz denim fabric that allows you to enjoy a strong vertical fade."


A great item again by FWs.

DSC00014-5-scaled.jpg

From VMC insta:
VMCFWBirnerDenimShirt.thumb.png.774caa81744b771247e88e381180edb5.png

Posted (edited)

506XX 1941, new denim, non-wash... which I much prefer as I have at least some control over how much to shrink it.  Jeans to follow next month I hear

20260515 FW 1941 Jacket.jpg

Edited by MJF9
Posted
2 hours ago, MJF9 said:

506XX 1941, new denim, non-wash... which I much prefer as I have at least some control over how much to shrink it.  Jeans to follow next month I hear

20260515 FW 1941 Jacket.jpg

It looks great.
But the cut is quite long and with narrower shoulders compared to the chest not so boxy overall.
It seems to have been (one wonders why) the cut of that year as the Warehouse 1941 is cut similar but with wider shoulders and a narrower pit.
I think, it was generally, that during the war period the jackets got longer. 
The 1946 and on ones as well as the 30s ones are quite short, around 60cm.

Posted (edited)

I'm expecting the size 44 to end up about 60 pit to pit and 61 length, so quite boxy... but let's see when it lands

Agree the FW 44-45 is longer than most. However, my SCSC 43 and 45 are both 60/61 length though.

I'll post measurements before and after washing when it lands - probably when the 41 jeans come through

Edit - the '41 jacket size is supposed to be between the '33 and '42 models... time will tell :)

Edited by MJF9
Posted

The shortest I would say is probably the 1927 or 1933

 

Posted
8 hours ago, MJF9 said:

I'm expecting the size 44 to end up about 60 pit to pit and 61 length, so quite boxy... but let's see when it lands

Agree the FW 44-45 is longer than most. However, my SCSC 43 and 45 are both 60/61 length though.

I'll post measurements before and after washing when it lands - probably when the 41 jeans come through

Edit - the '41 jacket size is supposed to be between the '33 and '42 models... time will tell :)

For the 46 for example Iceclimber gives the exact same measurements for the 1941 and the 1942 506 jackets:

N/W 46: sts- 54cm ptp-66cm bl-68cm sl-66.5cm

If the denim shrinks the same as the 1942 it should result in the following (see Wolfpack page )
O/W 44: sts- 51cm ptp-58cm bl-63cm sl-62cm 
So a bit longer than you expect @MJF9 (Just checked DC4 measures 61cm though )

O/W 46: sts- 53cm ptp-62cm bl-64cm sl-62cm


Comparing the back lengths for size 46:
1933: size 46 NW-69cm      OW-64cm
1941: size 46 NW- 68cm     OW-??
1942: size 46 NW -68cm    OW- 64cm
1944-45: size 46 NW-  OW- 65cm (on some sites: 63cm)
1946/47- 46 NW-  67cm *, O/W- 61.5cm

* interestingly both Schroeder and MB state it as 67cm, so a lot of shrinking for this denim.
At least this is for the size 46 and that is also my experience.
In some text a distinction had been made between denim jackets and blouses, with the latter being shorter, but I can't remember the details. Perhaps someone else can.

And for some more numbers. Comparing the FW 1941 with the Warehouse one. I'm going with the measurements by Wolfpack for the 1942 one here.
So: FW O/W 1941 size 46: 
sts- 53cm ptp-62cm bl-64cm sl-62cm

The Warehouse one Lot 2001XX(2000XX) (1941MODEL) is for size 46 after washing:
sts- 54cm ptp- 59cm bl-64,5cm bl- 64cm
So a bit slimmer in the chest, a bit longer in the back and also longer sleeves.

Posted (edited)

Now the 1941 506 O/W measurements have been posted by some retailers.

Old Stand Up:

FW1941506XXmeasurementsOldStandup.png.419682bbae31150acc3f5ec29749a4fa.png

 

Wolf Pack:

Size 36(S) 38(M) 40(L) 42(XL) 44(XXL) 46(XXXL) 48(XXXXL)
肩幅 42cm 44cm 47cm 49cm 51cm 53cm 56cm
身幅 49cm 52cm 54cm 57cm 59cm 62cm 64cm
着丈 55cm 56cm 58cm 60cm 62cm 64cm 66cm
袖丈 59cm 60cm 61cm 62cm 63cm 63cm 64cm

 

For me the 44 would be a bit too tight- I have some jackets which are in that area.
And the 46 with 64cm is probably too long for my preferences. I currently prefer the length to be around 60cm.

Like I had written before the WH jacket 1941 is also relatively long, so it seems that for some reason the jackets of that time were made longer.
Perhaps it will start to grow on me and I'll change my mind :D
Or perhaps I find a retailer who has one that is cut shorter. There can be differences of a few centimetres.

 

Edited by indigoeagle
Posted (edited)

@indigoeagle thanks for this ^.  I find OW to be quite industrial for many brands i.e. very hot wash and hot dry, perhaps to shrink more-or-less to the max.  I'd prefer to have raw so I can play with the wash temperature to get the right shrink (and occasionally totally screw it up).  Agreeing the 46 looks quite long, and the 44 narrow in the chest... 59cm hmmmm.  My '37 jacket came OW in size 44 and I thought feck this will not work... but it stretched out and works nicely.  Depends on the denim I suppose and the arm hole size and and and... 

For shorter war-time jackets, the Sugar Cane Super Collectibles hit the mark 

Edited by MJF9
Posted
13 hours ago, MJF9 said:

@indigoeagle thanks for this ^.  I find OW to be quite industrial for many brands i.e. very hot wash and hot dry, perhaps to shrink more-or-less to the max.  I'd prefer to have raw so I can play with the wash temperature to get the right shrink (and occasionally totally screw it up).  Agreeing the 46 looks quite long, and the 44 narrow in the chest... 59cm hmmmm.  My '37 jacket came OW in size 44 and I thought feck this will not work... but it stretched out and works nicely.  Depends on the denim I suppose and the arm hole size and and and... 

For shorter war-time jackets, the Sugar Cane Super Collectibles hit the mark 

Sure, if you don't wash them hot the 44 will probably work out.
My first 506 from FW is a 40, which I've only cold rinsed. It fits like a 42.

Posted
16 minutes ago, reubensangwich said:

I believe it's a repro of the US Army physical training uniform from the 2010s

We’re really already reproing Syria and Afghanistan?

Credit where credit’s due, I don’t really get down with nylon in most cases but the set looks pretty sweet

Posted
2 hours ago, Double 0 Soul said:

A shell suit!? :o

Jeez.. 1988 repro? 

What sneaks you wearing it with.. Reebok Pump or LA Gear Street Slammers? 

Nike hyper ko2 with the shank zipper halfway up

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, julian-wolf said:

I don’t really get down with nylon in most cases but the set looks pretty sweet

This is without question the nicest synthetic fabric I've ever handled.

Edited by l13902733261
Posted
10 minutes ago, julian-wolf said:

We’re really already reproing Syria and Afghanistan?

I mean Japan was reproing 60s Levis back in the early 90s, not far off I'd say.

Posted

Looks like the gear my ROTC roommate in college had. There’s repros that I get, and then there’s repros that I…can’t quite get. Like when Warehouse sold a repro of a sweatshirt shirt from the high school I went to. The kicker is that this gear is way less comfortable for working out/training than other options too. I’m sure I’m missing something but alas that’s okay with me. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, ATWM said:

Looks like the gear my ROTC roommate in college had. There’s repros that I get, and then there’s repros that I…can’t quite get. Like when Warehouse sold a repro of a sweatshirt shirt from the high school I went to. The kicker is that this gear is way less comfortable for working out/training than other options too. I’m sure I’m missing something but alas that’s okay with me. 

Being most of these clothes are made with the Japanese consumer in mind, it's just Americana to them. Graphics from US schools, design hints from US military uniforms, etc.   

On top of that I think it's just the natural progression of Mil-Repro, as time plods on the wars this gear was worn in become more of a distant memory to the population, and it becomes more okay to wear as fashion. It's only a matter of time until we start seeing digital and multi-cam repros from some of these brands.

On one hand, I think this particular jacket looks pretty good, but on the other I wouldn't be caught dead in it because anyone who knows what it is would think I was wearing my own old gear, or possibly worse, someone else's; just a situation I'd like to avoid. However, this doesn't stop me from wearing my 60s fatigue pants or WW2 style tanker jacket; nobody is going to ask me when I served, or even notice their ties to the military, because it's been so long since these items were actually worn as uniforms. As well as the fact that fashion culture has changed so dramatically since those times, you just don't see people returning from their time in the service needing to wear their uniforms as casual and work wear anymore.  

Edited by reubensangwich
Posted

Does anyone here have the Neal Cassidy chambray shirt? What was your washing style for the shirt? Hand wash and line dry inside or outside or machine wash and machine dry?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...