Photography Post Vol. 2

[surfed57]

[Quiver]

[joelz]

Quiver the lighting is intense

[joelz]

[octo]

[octo]

[dino might]

some shades at oak..

[mis]

I dont know about laws. But isnt the superfuture name trademarked? so if you throw on a retro in front it becomes legal?

[dino might]

no idea what the story behind them is. just nosing around and saw that. hmm.

[panicnation]

needs to be changed 10%

[joelz]

dammit octo why'd you have to go and blow my pictures out of the water? those are sick

[octo]

Thanks man

[C0C0]

reminds me of minor white

[Leugwai]

[erk]

i can't rep you aaronS, but those are some cool images.

[Leugwai]

Found an unprocessed roll from this summer:

]

this photo would have been reali good if there was more depth of field, lowered the angle just a little bit, and took a step back

[__Nicholas]

nothing fancy about these photos, but its just a good example of how much of a difference a good flash makes

first photo is with my stock flash on my nikon d50

second photo is with my nikon sb600 flash bouncing off of the roof

[joelz]

[asdbra]

Nice, very nice.

[asdbra]

still quite new to photography, comments/critiques very much welcomed.

[undvlpd]

some dirty scans but comments and critiques welcome.

http://undvlpd.blogspot.com/

[Becks23]

[braid]

Nice one Joelz. Would you mind saying what lens and aperture setting you used? The background blur is fairly seamless without the "pentagon" blur.

[joelz]

Nice one Joelz. Would you mind saying what lens and aperture setting you used? The background blur is fairly seamless without the "pentagon" blur.

Thanks, I'm using the NIKKOR 18-105mm kit lens - nothing too special yet, apeture was at f/5.6

Apparently my camera includes a boat load of exif info when you upload to flickr, here's the "more info" page: http://www.flickr.com/photos/joelzimmer/3002067258/meta/ (if you are interested)

[altwaev]

just goes to show you that numbers aren't everything! i wouldn't have guessed that was taken at F/5.6 and ISO 560!

[jet@omic]

hi im jet im new here. all about the polaroids

[rockon99]

a boat load of exif info

shit you really werent kidding hahaha

[Jkissi7]

Becks that looks great man .. wow

out to vote and all that good stuff

http://www.streetetiquette.com

[U MAD]

Nice one Joelz. Would you mind saying what lens and aperture setting you used? The background blur is fairly seamless without the "pentagon" blur.

don't lights blur into the shape of your aperture? IE pentagon blur w/ five bladed iris or hexagon with 6 or whatever?

I'd like to know myself if anyone can c/d

[soonami]

Generally speaking yes, but if the aperture has rounded blades like the nikkor 18-105 VR does, then the bokeh (quality of the out of focus areas) will be rounded also.

What I think braidkid was struck with, as am I, is the quality of the bokeh--how the two bright spots are neutral (even in intensity without a distinct outline around the circle) and how the other spots blend so well into the background with a gaussian distribution (brighter in the middle and dissapating exponentially towards the edge of the circle. Also surprising is that at that relatively small aperature, the bokeh was that good, especially with a lens that has VR