Evisu is still loved!

[calvinc]

Can you post measurements of the 0001s Calvin, please?

I think I said it somewhere above, but it seems to me that Lot 0001 corresponds to the Lot 2000, in No.2 denim (or No.1 pre-shrinkage), and NOT Lot 2001.

Lot0001 pre-soak measurement tagged 32

Waist: 32’

Front rise: 13’

Back rise: 15’

Upper thigh: 26’

Inseam: 35.5

Knee measurement: 20.4

Leg opening: 17.6

Compare it to my 0331, this pair has a higher front rise, roomier in the thigh, and bigger leg opening.

Haha, i agree. I think i read it somehwere in "evisu lot 2000 no.1" thread before, and there was a dude posted the pre-soak pics and the fit was similar to my 0001. But again, u cant expect the same shrinkage as no.1.. and this 0001 will remain baggy for me. Different sizing method is required I suspect?

Originally Posted by hahnstch

here it is...

2001 - evisu basic cut, button fly, hidden rivet, gull back pocket

2002 - same as 2001, but with zipper fly

2000 - a little more straight silhouette compared to 2001

Here is the note i took down when i read the whole thread a while back. does it mean 2000 is roomier in the thigh compare it to 2001?

[heflys]

From my understanding, the 0001 cut is loose like the 2001 cut. At least the ones I have are pretty loose. The 0001 cut supposedly runs larger in the waist, but not based on those measurements provided.

The 2000 cut is a little slimmer.

[chambo2008]

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Unique-Evisu-Jeans-32x35_W0QQitemZ190284865997QQcmdZViewItemQQptZMen_s_Clothes?hash=item190284865997&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=72%3A1685%7C66%3A2%7C65%3A12%7C39%3A1%7C240%3A1318

dunno if i found these before but someone should jump on these..

i would if i was a 32....

oh the leg opening on the brown box is 7inchs

anyone know why you can't find odd number waist international jeans?

think im a perfect 29

[heflys]

Whelp, the site has been updated. The u.s. site at least. Wow, at $270, the No.1 denim is pretty affordable.

[CrashTestBrummie]

Lot0001 pre-soak measurement tagged 32

Waist: 32’

Front rise: 13’

Back rise: 15’

Upper thigh: 26’

Inseam: 35.5

Knee measurement: 20.4

Leg opening: 17.6

Compare it to my 0331, this pair has a higher front rise, roomier in the thigh, and bigger leg opening.

Haha, i agree. I think i read it somehwere in "evisu lot 2000 no.1" thread before, and there was a dude posted the pre-soak pics and the fit was similar to my 0001. But again, u cant expect the same shrinkage as no.1.. and this 0001 will remain baggy for me. Different sizing method is required I suspect?

Originally Posted by hahnstch

here it is...

2001 - evisu basic cut, button fly, hidden rivet, gull back pocket

2002 - same as 2001, but with zipper fly

2000 - a little more straight silhouette compared to 2001

Here is the note i took down when i read the whole thread a while back. does it mean 2000 is roomier in the thigh compare it to 2001?

From my understanding, the 0001 cut is loose like the 2001 cut. At least the ones I have are pretty loose. The 0001 cut supposedly runs larger in the waist, but not based on those measurements provided.

The 2000 cut is a little slimmer.

Thanks for the measurements Calvin, I'll put some up of Lot 2000 in No.2 denim when I'm back home.

The 2001 cut is roomier in the thigh than 2000, assuming you're comparing like-for-like denim, i.e. No.2 against No.2 etc.

Heflys, whilst I appreciate that you may have been told this on good authority, I myself cannot see how the 0001 cut is supposed to be based on the Japanese 2001 cut based on the denim I have.

The 0001 cut, whilst it may be baggy on some, is pretty straight in the leg as far as my knowledge runs. The silhouette, to my eyes, is the same as the 2000 cut but ONLY when compared to the sanforised or preshrunk dimensions.

You simply do not get hipflare on the 0001 cut in the same way that you do with 2001, as you can see the leg room here on the 2001 cut:

If this silhouette were the standard International cut then you'd be seeing a LOT more hipflare than you normally get with the International lines.

[chambo2008]

Whelp, the site has been updated. The u.s. site at least. Wow, at $270, the No.1 denim is pretty affordable.

not really what i was expecting, must be more to come i guess

[akuma no uta]

why didnt they presoak the no 1 denim for the picture? or is the fit really that shitty on those?

[heflys]

Heflys, whilst I appreciate that you may have been told this on good authority, I myself cannot see how the 0001 cut is supposed to be based on the Japanese 2001 cut based on the denim I have.

You probably know more than I do, since you have more experience with the Japanese side of things.

not really what i was expecting, must be more to come i guess

Speaking of which, the 0200 seems to be a pretty nice cut.. A little slimmer than the 2005, not entirely skinny, but at least it runs true to size; so no funny business.

I also like that Evisu is taking their denim more seriously. Furthermore, I'm glad to to see that there are not too many garish designs s usual.

[heflys]

why didnt they presoak the no 1 denim for the picture? or is the fit really that shitty on those?

They look pre-soaked to me. They probably plan on selling that pair.

[calvinc]

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Unique-Evisu-Jeans-32x35_W0QQitemZ190284865997QQcmdZViewItemQQptZMen_s_Clothes?hash=item190284865997&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=72%3A1685%7C66%3A2%7C65%3A12%7C39%3A1%7C240%3A1318

dunno if i found these before but someone should jump on these..

i would if i was a 32....

oh the leg opening on the brown box is 7inchs

anyone know why you can't find odd number waist international jeans?

think im a perfect 29

Anyone familiar with this pair?

Thanks for the measurements Calvin, I'll put some up of Lot 2000 in No.2 denim when I'm back home.

The 2001 cut is roomier in the thigh than 2000, assuming you're comparing like-for-like denim, i.e. No.2 against No.2 etc.

Thanks Crash

[blm14]

Dammit, when are those no1s going to show up on the evisu website?!

Are they going to be on the international evisu site only or the US one as well, anybody know?

[chambo2008]

they are on the us one now...

[heflys]

Hahaha.

Anyway, I think Evisu made the right decision with this batch of No.1'. Instead of shrinking from the tag sized, the shrink to it.

[CrashTestBrummie]

Best get them fast, only 100 pairs on sale...

http://shop.evisu.com/collections/spring-2009/products/evisu_heritage_lazy_s_jeans

Inseam's a bit short though...

[ILHE1S]

^I already ordered a pair!!!

Yeah I noticed the small inseam. Hope that's not a problem.

Will take pic's as soon as I get them!

[CrashTestBrummie]

Yeah I noticed the small inseam. Hope that's not a problem.

Well, what's your inseam in relation to the jeans you've bought?

[Setone]

Lazy S - True to size ?

[heflys]

Lazy S - True to size ?

Yes.

edit: They actually run 1 inch larger in the waist, but they're slim jeans.

Inseam's a bit short though...

Was wondering about that.

[chambo2008]

god damn only 100 fuckers......

[selaviso]

i know bummed about that cuz i wasted too much money in vegas.

[Setone]

Tempting... But delivery to UK, and and a likelihood of a customs hit is putting me off.

Just wondering any chance of another batch of 100 for the EU?

[heflys]

You guys, supposedly, will get the original version in the 2005 cut. But it won't be as limited.

[cheep]

slow to fade... but not getting the attention they deserve

[selaviso]

cheep those are coming along great.

[selaviso]

oh and nice to see you back!

[salaami]

agent link has returned from the bowels of the denim underworld! whatcha mean cheep, the lazy S aint selling:confused:those are the dopest evisu to come out in a while. how long have they been on sale?

[heflys]

I think he means he's not giving them the attention they deserve; they just came out.

[cheep]

fuck... i dont know... i meant that im not wearing them enugh... back pocket rivit kept ripping my hip open when i was skating, and i got a bit of a staph infection. im afraid to skate in them now, and ive been wearing my vintage lees to work most days

[heflys]

Shit, that's definitely a good reason to put them aside.

[Quik]

Damn, I want those lazy-s, but I'm scared that at 6'0 tall, the 31.7 inseam will be too short, what you guys think, is it worth it?