Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hogg, you really wanna take a closer look at the Beatle buster. I think it might be what you're looking for. If you notice there are different measurements for the raw 18oz buster vs the 21oz buster.

Posted

555 is the slimmest cut. The rear rise is a little to high for the cut and ends up sagging on me, if it weren't for that I'd probably get a second pair.

Posted

Yeah I have a pair of 666's and Beatles and I prefer the latter.  The 666's are pretty tight in the thighs for me and the rise is a touch awkward for me.  Its a shame because I love the 25oz fabric so I wish I could wear the 666's more but they're just a bit too uncomfortable.

 

I also heard somewhere that Japanese 666's maybe slimmer than for-export 666's?  I haven't really done any legwork (pun) to figure out if that is true.  I purchased them from Vari so they'd be Japanese models.

Posted

Thanks bugula, useful info. By the sounds I'm going to want more room than they're cut for.. I think this is going to prove tricky. :blink:  :D

 

yeah, wish i'd gotten the 666 to help compare to. :)

 

i do have the SExIH301s though...not sure if that comparison would be helpful.

Posted

 

IHxBo1

1x handwash, 1x hotsoak, 1x seawash, 3x machinewash

Sept'13 - Sept'15

5E8D2214-7151-4EBB-AAA2-5BBF00E739D5_zps

 

 

 

 

 

been a long time,

sr's lost count of everything

 

 
DSC_2890.jpg
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

Those two Holy Grail items deserve an eternal life for sure.

I just can't stop watching those beauties reflecting the full power of natural denim evolution at its best.

Posted

beatle (http://supertalk.superfuture.com/index.php/user/107954-beatle/) has just posted a reply to a topic that you have subscribed to titled "Iron Heart Jeans".

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ah ... Chocolate man strikes again

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks a lot beatle, yeah surprisingly I'm still alive ha ha

Posted (edited)

Yeah looks a bit big. Give a hot wash 

 

I went with my usual XL in these hoping they don't come up too small. The measurements looked pretty good just the shoulders were a bit smaller than i would of liked...

Edited by spitfiredealer
Posted

Just picked up a pair of 666-XHS from IHUK. This moment is long overdue...

E567AE7B-1829-445E-B4E8-696C40BADE91_zps

43FB3535-F59E-40D2-A95B-F14A4F50E400_zps

CCE02024-BBAD-484A-8CF8-9868066A3866_zps

DA9ADB01-3D20-40BA-82D9-12789D66D9BF_zps

These remind me a lot of my SEXIHXLSXA13's when they were new. The denim is so thick and rigid and dark. I didn't have quite as tough of an experience as some people have, but this denim is no joke. It's going to take me forever to tame these things. Next pics will be after a soak/wash and a full day's wear.

Posted

They are interesting jeans to wear.  Even after 2 preliminary soaks, they were stiff as hell.  About a month in of light wear in now and they are starting to soften up a bit and fall more naturally. 

Posted

forgive my ingnorance and lack of searching - what's the difference between the 634SR and 634-UHR? The denim is the same, no - 21/23oz? Buttons and hardware look different, different patch, different measurements, different arcs. Anything else significant? Cheers! mpp

Posted

Well the SR is no longer made, but the UHR is the same denim and aside from the differences in details, the fit of the SR was a little different than the 634s. I can't say if the UHR has a different fit though.

Posted

The S/R was the anniversary model. It has the 21/23 oz raw denim and a slightly different cut than the 634 (but then all 634 iterations are slightly different). The UHR denim was made to the specs of the SR last year as the SR was sold out. And, to add to the confusion, the UHR is still called SR in Japan, as far as i know.

Posted (edited)

I think Giles mentioned it a while ago and in the most recent lightning denim issue the SR's are featured as new model, so they might be a recent release. And the details like copper Buttons and different arcs are still used on that model.

Edited by Max Power
Posted

Nice everyinchofgod. How is the fit compared to those SEXIHXLSXA13's? Haven't seen you post any updates on that pair in a while. 

Posted

Pretty similar fit, but I think the SEXIHXLSXA13's are just a touch slimmer from the mid-thigh down and have a lower rise. They've been retired for the summer since the HWDC2 ended, but now that it's starting to cool off a bit, they'll be in rotation with my 666-XHS soon.

Posted

DWCxUHR at five months. Freshly cleaned~

 

a3h0PLRl.jpg

 

PJrdn8Jl.jpg

Posted (edited)

Size 36 816DD after having them hemmed. The cuffs look sloppy and are stiff as hell, I hope they'll settle with some wear. They are super comfy and relaxed, like sweatpants (if it wasn't for the stiff material). Being onewash certainly helps to get a softer feel, but the're still rigid.
fzYVkxc.jpg
UQGFjtj.jpg
5MuHQH3.jpg
nkqoz5f.jpg
NTkxhJI.jpg
Z8HsrhB.jpg
Favorite details: the back and slash pockets and the blue thread which makes this pair so much more appealing to me than the bright contrasting threads on the 634DD.

Edited by Max Power
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...