Jump to content

atlast&co , butcher products , timeworn clothing


edmond

Recommended Posts

@chicote both the 147 and the 162 jeans below are w34, both washed at 30C, line dry only.  The 162 have seen more action and are softer due to that but would be anyway as the denim is stretchier.  The 147 is nipped more at the waist (not sure the pics show it up, but a few others above and previously have said the same, and @smoothsailor's pics above give a hint at this), plus the denim on the 147 waistband is double thickness and is also a consideration. Fine margins, I know, but worth noting. Timeworn direct are helpful for sure as Alec says, but I think other members have reported they have got it slightly wrong on length and shrinkage, so worth erring on the side of caution imo...

147

IMG_2368.JPEG

162

IMG_2371.JPEG

Edited by MJF9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MJF9 said:

@chicote both the 147 and the 162 jeans below are w34, both washed at 30C, line dry only.  The 162 have seen more action and are softer due to that but would be anyway as the denim is stretchier.  The 147 is nipped more at the waist (not sure the pics show it up, but a few others above and previously have said the same, and @smoothsailor's pics above give a hint at this), plus the denim on the 147 waistband is double thickness and is also a consideration. Fine margins, I know, but worth noting. Timeworn direct are helpful for sure as Alec says, but I think other members have reported they have got it slightly wrong on length and shrinkage, so worth erring on the side of caution imo...

147

IMG_2368.JPEG

162

IMG_2371.JPEG

Are both Lee repros?
The second pair (162) seems to have protruding rivets vs. the usual flat ones like on the 147s. Perhaps just how it looks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, indigoeagle said:

Are both Lee repros?
The second pair (162) seems to have protruding rivets vs. the usual flat ones like on the 147s. Perhaps just how it looks.

The lot 147 is a Lee repro

The lot 162 is an At Last take on a Levis 1937 model

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MJF9 said:

The lot 147 is a Lee repro

The lot 162 is an At Last take on a Levis 1937 model

Ah. I see
Thank you


I had done a quick search for the 162 and got images of jeans with Lee type rivets. I saw now, that those were for the Lot 161.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Le Clown Bleu said:

hmm i think for the 147 id be a 36 as im a 35  waist but have widish hips and military chinos out of stock :(

Depends on how you wear them, they have a high rise and the hip area has alot of room

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Le Clown Bleu said:

may ask  how the cut on these are? do they lean more towards the wide side of things?

Very wide, wider then the jeans, especially in the hip/thigh area

If you wish i can meassure them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, SLAYER said:

Very wide, wider then the jeans, especially in the hip/thigh area

If you wish i can meassure them

yes please, they look really good and i usually only wear wider trousers so looking forward for these to come back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Le Clown Bleu here you go - these are them, in size 34

They’re pretty big, widest pair I have by a good margin right now, significantly more so than both the pairs of At Last jeans I have.

I believe these might be out of stock at Timeworn at the moment, but that may have changed recently, so always worth asking.

IMG_5337.jpeg

IMG_5338.jpeg

IMG_5339.jpeg

IMG_5340.jpeg

IMG_5341.jpeg

IMG_5342.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Alec Leamas said:

@Le Clown Bleu here you go - these are them, in size 34

They’re pretty big, widest pair I have by a good margin right now, significantly more so than both the pairs of At Last jeans I have.

I believe these might be out of stock at Timeworn at the moment, but that may have changed recently, so always worth asking.

IMG_5337.jpeg

IMG_5338.jpeg

IMG_5339.jpeg

IMG_5340.jpeg

IMG_5341.jpeg

IMG_5342.jpeg

yeh their out of stock they told me September october for more, but they look good and would fit in my wardrobe so il just waiting till there back so i can get multiple things at once shirting likely out of the question bar t shirts

Edited by Le Clown Bleu
more detail
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I thought these At Last pants that I got from Brogueshop the other day, could benefit from a proper trouser cuff, and creases. Today I tackled the job.
I'd forgotten what a pain in the ass it is to do this kind of cuff, especially if there's any kind of taper to the lower leg.

I'll spare you all the details. The end result look decent.

image.thumb.jpeg.86fcbd841698690b9f3dfe679a1bcf29.jpeg

Edited by CSL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CSL said:

I thought these At Last pants that I got from Brogueshop the other day, could benefit from a proper trouser cuff, and creases. Today I tackled the job.
I'd forgotten what a pain in the ass it is to do this kind of cuff, especially if there's any kind of taper to the lower leg.

I'll spare you all the details. The end result look decent.

image.thumb.jpeg.86fcbd841698690b9f3dfe679a1bcf29.jpeg

how much are these? thanks

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Signet said:

how much are these? thanks

 

$325 but that's imported to the US. I would think somewhat less if you can order directly from Japan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, CSL said:

I thought these At Last pants that I got from Brogueshop the other day, could benefit from a proper trouser cuff, and creases. Today I tackled the job.
I'd forgotten what a pain in the ass it is to do this kind of cuff, especially if there's any kind of taper to the lower leg.

I'll spare you all the details. The end result look decent.

image.thumb.jpeg.86fcbd841698690b9f3dfe679a1bcf29.jpeg

They look great!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/24/2025 at 1:51 AM, Alec Leamas said:

They look great!

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/26/2025 at 4:19 PM, ColdsnapBryan said:

I think the best thing you can do for At Last Co. is to try it on in store and take the sales associate sizing advice since all their items are based on a different pattern. I did that and left with a 42 jacket and 34 pant in the lot 147, which is much different to my usual 40 jacket and 36 pant TTS. So that would be almost a size down in the 147, it's their widest cut. 

Those who have the 147 jacket @Facini does the fabric go through a stage of being very hairy? I was surprised at how much hair the denim had once it came out of the first wash. 

tbh @ColdsnapBryan, it's been so long since it was raw that i barely remember, though i would like to think it was pretty hairy initially!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...