WW2 repro / detailed jeans

[rbeck]

7 hours ago, CSL said:

One thing I'm wondering about, I believe Lee (& Wrangler?) were making jeans & jackets in 1944. I've never heard anything about their products having the sloppy sewing element. Perhaps someone here can shed some light on that subject?


 

I just saw these wwii era Lee infant sized pants on instagram this morning and they also have sloppy stitching

https://www.instagram.com/p/C7P6YH1vlce/?igsh=MWFodGNpMnZpaGh3Nw==

[shredwin_206]

Y'all can have the sloppy stitching. Give me Freewheelers WWII or give me death! Hahahahhaa   

[CSL]

5 hours ago, rbeck said:

I just saw these wwii era Lee infant sized pants on instagram this morning and they also have sloppy stitching

https://www.instagram.com/p/C7P6YH1vlce/?igsh=MWFodGNpMnZpaGh3Nw==

Those look pretty tight compared to the highly asymmetrical SC jacket. I see some overlapping stitching where they've run out of thread & started over, but all the lines look on target. 

[CSL]

5 hours ago, shredwin_206 said:

Y'all can have the sloppy stitching. Give me Freewheelers WWII or give me death! Hahahahhaa   

That's the direction I went, Shredwin & I'm not disappointed although I will say I liked the fit of the TCB contest jeans better, and also the old LVC model. 

[rbeck]

12 minutes ago, CSL said:

Those look pretty tight compared to the highly asymmetrical SC jacket. I see some overlapping stitching where they've run out of thread & started over, but all the lines look on target. 

One sample is hardly enough to base the whole era on. Regardless, the back pockets and hems are pretty sloppy. Plus baby jeans are probably easier to keep straight on since the seams aren't as long. 

Here's some war era lees that it looks like they botched the waistband topstitching. The back side of the waistband shows the needle missed the inner edge of the waistband (pic 4). I'd say that isn't on target. Most other seams look pretty okay, but the backstitching in some places looks just as sloppy as the SC levis repros (check the pocket bag picture where the coin pocket stitches are apparent) .

 https://denimarchieves.com/e/vintage_and_old_denim_bottoms/lee_101b_wwii_en.html

Lees of that era would have been union made where I don't think Levis ever was union? I wonder if that had an effect too? If you're union you wouldn't feel the same pressure to churn out pairs of jeans no matter the quality that non-union workers would, so quality may have improved from that? Purely speculation here. 

[CSL]

Point taken, rbeck. The example you've shown definitely  demonstrates some sloppy sewing.
I guess it's this stitch line on the right side of the buttons that is my main head scratcher. I think to myself would someone actually buy that (speaking of back in the era it was made)? I guess there were situations where employers bought in bulk & handed out to their workers who would have had no say in the matter.
 

 

That all being said, if SC will just admit it's a factory second, & slash the price, I'll buy one (wink).

Edited May 22 by CSL

[Maynard Friedman]

7 minutes ago, CSL said:

I guess it's this stitch line on the right side of the buttons that is my main head scratcher. I think to myself would someone actually buy that (speaking of back in the era it was made)?

Now those unlucky souls who missed out on this 80 years ago will have a second chance to buy, for a mere $500

[LazyS]

CSL I was just wondering if the wonky deadstock examples were leftovers people didn't want

@rbeck I have a 2 pairs of 1952 leepros and  both have different sections of the waist band like that

https://imgur.com/n0m4MLXhttps://imgur.com/n0m4MLX

Edited May 22 by LazyS

[CSL]

LazyS, Yes. It could be that.
The only time I've seen a WW2 Levi jacket in person was at Inspiration. A fellow was wearing one & it looked superb. I engaged him in conversation about it. I didn't go over it with a fine tooth comb but it didn't look wonky at all.

[rbeck]

@LazyS Interesting. It isn't critical that that stitch holds the inner part of the waistband so maybe they never cared about it in the first place. 

@CSL i agree that that such you've highlighted is the most glaringly obvious one and also agree that I'd be questioning it if i were buying that jacket in the 40s. 

[MJF9]

I have the '43 tux... beautifully wonky it is too... makes a refreshing change from all that straight stitching that has saturated the market 😜

I've worn it down the local supermarket before and Mavis on checkout never batted an eyelid... but that may be because I stood ever so slightly on a slant to make it appear that the box pleats were straight... actually it's probably because there is only us 20 Sufu'ers who ruminate (in a good way :)) on these things

While we're chatting... I was at my lad's football semi-final a few weeks ago wearing a FW wabash jacket.  One of the parents said 'I'm a bit superstitious... you're not wearing your lucky denim jacket'... I asked him which one... and his response proved to me he thought I only had one and they were therefore all the same WTF 🤯.  The sad ending to that story is the lads lost their first competitive game in 2 years that day 😭... the key message I took from it is that, irrespective of the model, all denim jackets can be lucky!!

I'll put some '43 tux pics up soon so you can throw tomatoes at it

[Dr_Heech]

1 hour ago, MJF9 said:

....

I'll put some '43 tux pics up soon so you can throw tomatoes at it

Can we throw red tabs at it in case two of them stick 😉