Jump to content

Real McCoy's / Joe McCoy's Jeans


jubei

Recommended Posts

Im over in London for a few days so i took the chance to visit the Real McCoys shop 

IMG_20170925_181409_346_zpssdmksypz.jpg

 

20170925_144905_zpsqxgpmezu.jpg

 

Great store , doesn't compare with the Tokyo shop in terms of size but still a cool shop 

 

20170925_145453_zps9tfzhplw.jpg

 

Loved this vintage tour jacket 

Didnt leave empty handed  

20170925_155430_zpskwkpamsl.jpg

 

IMG_20170925_181409_348_zpsv9jf6rnv.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 25.09.2017 at 3:18 AM, edmond said:

Wpuld love to hve a pair of those

 

On 25.09.2017 at 4:21 AM, Aries said:

Very interesting Foxy.

....

 

On 25.09.2017 at 7:12 AM, edmond said:

can i order directly from real mccoys in nagoyo? without going thru a proxy?

 

12 hours ago, lance said:

Lot.001XX looks like my first Real McCoy's denim! thanks, Foxy

very curious, too! the pictures make the denim look worth investigating.

so far I haven't heard or seen anything but the ad in Clutch (maybe the September and November issues have more teasers) - ordering from Japan will be tricky...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Depending on the sizing there is virtually no difference in the legs - same width, same curves, only real difference is the top block and, obviously, denim & hardware.

I sized for my waist measurement - W30 in 001 equals W31 in 003 - comparing these 2 sizes & models has the legs identical and the 003 with significantly higher front & back rise. The 003 is supposed to sit in waist (authentic) and the 001 sits lower, on the hips (modern).

If you have them both sit on your hips the crotch will drop lower on the 003.

53E96939-61CF-4B50-A14E-7CD8B7E8026E.jpeg

6F930352-74D8-4477-9977-8E14B691645E.jpeg

E10DF6B9-ADFF-469A-88F3-59A879FAF045.jpeg

CDE52E42-83BE-4F53-9335-8349C58807EC.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys,

Been a long time...

Lot. 004 at almost 3 years. These weren't worn everyday and there were a few months off when I didn't wear them, washed frequently (usually about after a month of wear).

Tried to capture/adjust the pics to show their true color, but it's hard to show.

37535327874_14caab6ec6_b.jpg

 

38246362141_12dc1aca60_b.jpg

 

26470272239_7c6e65e8e4_b.jpg

 

37535321324_b53296acf3_b.jpg

 

38191456396_513910a125_b.jpg

 

38246355971_cf41474eab_b.jpg

 

24374622198_29325d7954_b.jpg

 

24374719978_cce659925d_b.jpg

Edited by eleks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/7/2017 at 6:19 AM, edmond said:

Foxy any luck with for pics?

sorry, got too busy in the office yesterday...

been wearing the Lot.003 again since yesterday and I got reminded just how terribly nice they are - high rise, straight cut and some serious denim (17oz) - the Lot.S003 that you are looking for is much more moderate in regards to the denim (14.3oz) and it is, supposedly, sanforized.

 

IMG_5177.JPG

IMG_5181.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Aries said:

Great jeans. Both my 004s and my 991XHs have stood the test of time as my favourite pairs of denim I keep throwing on when I can't decide. Literally my default denims.

Can pretty much agree on that, love the 004s, the best pair I've had so far. I had the 991 too (non XH) as my first pair of raw jeans, but those stretched out more than I expected.

 

21 hours ago, Niro said:

very nice! I was so tempted to buy a pair when I was at Pronto in Bangkok

Thanks! You wouldn't regret buying them!

Edited by eleks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, edmond said:

Thx foxy donthey fit like an oversized csf?

Is they strrtch? Your saying im looking at a diff denim ??

Lot.003 is different from Lot.S003 - 17oz, unsanforized vs. 14.3oz, sanforized (S stands for sanforized, most likely). mine are tight now, shrank a lot and might have some stretching potential left, but it's going to be a tough fight...

Both cuts should be the same, but fit and sizing could/should be different due to denim properties (thickness, raw, sanforized) and sizing decision.

Lot.S003 might be something I should look into when I'm in London later this year...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...