WAYWT destroyed my life (2014)

[merz]

i did not want to quote the photo.. so, ellipses..?

[teddybonkers]

Well played sir.  To each his own.

[zayyarwinthein]

 

Everlane Shirt
EG Workaday Navy Bedford Cord
Norse Chinos and Socks

New Balance

[Mrama]

oak

ol

cdgh+ 

silent dd

Edited September 24, 2014 by Mrama

[Landadel]

 

RO

RO

(RO)

1970s chucks

Edited September 24, 2014 by Landadel

[SSchadenfreude]

shoulda just worn ro dunks already. In the remote chance that u somehow thought the chucks or that kinda sneak silhouette made sense here, u shoulda known that there are more appropriate alternatives. In the context of this fit they just conjure imagery of a budget ro fan or cheap guy

Edited September 24, 2014 by SSchadenfreude

[kH0yA Sw@Gp0o]

^here i looked like ultra cheap guy earlier
came across these old pants of mine i haven't used in a long while; feel like they're now out of place in my wardrobe but they're comfy so i am torn

 

[bizubimu]

it's the long black socks that try to replicate the height of dunks and the dunks style wraparound lacing that elevate this to ultra cheap guy status for me. I think I would have liked this a lot more without the attempt at imitation which just strikes me as super contrived.

 

shoulda just worn ro dunks already. In the remote chance that u somehow thought the chucks or that kinda sneak silhouette made sense here, u shoulda known that there are more appropriate alternatives. In the context of this fit they just conjure imagery of a budget ro fan or cheap guy

[SSchadenfreude]

^you repped him tho.

tbh i don't really think he or anyone who dared to post this kind of fit would purposely try to replicate the ht of ro dunks w/ socks. that's just 2 obvious a blunder (giving him the benefit of the doubt). something tells me the choice of footwear was out of necessity. would be worse if that's not the case.

if he was wearing ramones or some other ro footwear, it'd just be a warm weather uniform standard ro fit. whatever. i wouldn't have bothered commenting, as i'm not so interested in basic head 2 toe ro fits. maybe had he worn some interesting sandals, i might have even thought that it looked comfy or summer apropos.

that aside, as far as chuck taylor look alikes, if he had opted for some other label like yohji, cdg, nns (nonative or n(n)), or even vis skags i wouldn't have thought budget ro fit or cheap or no monies guy.

the dustbag here is just funny to me. i've seen ballers, "fashion" people and the serious ro consumer actually use them, but never really with any sort of contrived or premeditated agenda. never 2 complete or make an outfit. just 4 the gym,  runnin errands, beach, carry lunch box, or extra shit (usually along with another bag/etc that couldn't fit everything). only outta convenience or just cause they didn't give a fuck.

Edited September 24, 2014 by SSchadenfreude

[bizubimu]

All things considered I still enjoyed the fit more than I disliked it. Cheapness aside, I liked the colors, and the texture of the pants looks nice... dude looks comfortable. So I repped.

[SSchadenfreude]

understood.  i'd be indifferent had he opted for ro footwear, or maybe even amused if non ro footwear of respectable standing had been utilized.

[Landadel]

To answer some of your questions:

 

- high socks, `cause it looked weird with low/no socks

- no sandals, `cause the forecast said it was gonna rain (it did, heavily)

- I like the tote a lot, carries a bunch of stuff (and it fit the color scheme)

 

All this talk about my chucks – no one noticed Thomas the engine in the background.

[SSchadenfreude]

u really like the ro tote that much?  i have over half a dozen.  i'll sell you some for yr bag collection if you want.

 

i did notice thomas the engine.  he saved you from neg rep.

[Landadel]

I got enough of them myself. Go buy yourself another Hitler shirt.

[SSchadenfreude]

I got enough of them myself. Go buy yourself another Hitler shirt.

Any of yr totes come w/ shoes? Edited September 24, 2014 by SSchadenfreude

[Landadel]

Yes, two pairs of Ramones – you can´t see them in the pic, because they´re in the tote bag.

[SSchadenfreude]

Yes, two pairs of Ramones – you can´t see them in the pic, because they´re in the tote bag.

oh 4 reals?

 

 

 09-21-2014, 04:04 PM   #44946

Landadel

Member

 

Join Date: Jul 2014

Location: Germany

Posts: 43

 

 

"I´m actually saving up for some Rick footwear"

 

http://stylezeitgeist.com/forums/showpost.php?p=471809&postcount=44946

 

according to yr quote on sz i thought u were "actually saving up for some Rick footwear."

did you kop two pairs of ramones in 3 days? my bad boo

Edited September 24, 2014 by SSchadenfreude

[Frieda_Nietzsche]

that aside, as far as chuck taylor look alikes, if he had opted for some other label like yohji, cdg, nns (nonative or n(n)), or even vis skags i wouldn't have thought budget ro fit or cheap or no monies guy.

 

last time I went to a RO store an employee was dressed head to toe in RO and - hold ur breath y'all - wearing chucks.

to buy a certain item can be a decision that isn't based on whether it makes you look rich or not. If you would've done your math you might have recognized by the rest of some of his outfits he can probably afford some geobaskets or ramones or whatever it is you demand from someone wearing rick to not look like he's poor.

[Landadel]

according to yr quote on sz i thought u were "actually saving up for some Rick footwear."

did you kop two pairs of ramones in 3 days? my bad boo

 

Are you really that stupid?

 

 

 

 

Yes, two pairs of Ramones – you can´t see them in the pic, because they´re in the tote bag.

 

 

Edited September 24, 2014 by Landadel

[SSchadenfreude]

last time I went to a RO store an employee was dressed head to toe in RO and - hold ur breath y'all - wearing chucks.

to buy a certain item can be a decision that isn't based on whether it makes you look rich or not. If you would've done your math you might have recognized by the rest of some of his outfits he can probably afford some geobaskets or ramones or whatever it is you demand from someone wearing rick to not look like he's poor.

pics or it didn't happen. plus if a ro employee had paired chucks with the particular ro articles he was wearing i probably would have the same reaction. 

 

if ur gonna stunt a  ro fit and just wear chucks,  u ain't ro-flossin proper like.  if it was a matter of him preferring a chuck taylor silhouette type for his outfit i'm just of the opinion that one of a higher/more exclusive designer or label would have a better equilibrium.  similar fits have looked good with even the likes of vis. plus it tells the audience that you didn't spend all your expendable funds on cut and sewns.

 

sorry i really don't recall his other fits, and mainly it has nothing to do with whether he is poor or rich irl.  the point is that the chucks imo cheapen his fit.  they make little sense in the context of it.  they make the fit even more boring.

Edited September 24, 2014 by SSchadenfreude

[rafsemens]

who cares whether or not ur poor in financial terms anyway? as long as you're wearing rick owens you'll be emanating poorness of an infinitely worse kind. ur sartorial taste 

[SSchadenfreude]

landadel i dont even think ur fit is that bad (yr ramones frontin and joke aside). 2 reiterate, i just dont think the cons...oops sorry i just saw your edit the "1970s chucks" (c'mon! like that makes a fuckin difference in this fit's context) really do shit any favors.

Edited September 25, 2014 by SSchadenfreude

[teddybonkers]

pics or it didn't happen. plus if a ro employee had paired chucks with the particular ro articles he was wearing i probably would have the same reaction. 

 

if ur gonna stunt a  ro fit and just wear chucks,  u ain't ro-flossin proper like.  if it was a matter of him preferring a chuck taylor silhouette type for his outfit i'm just of the opinion that one of a higher/more exclusive designer or label would have a better equilibrium.  similar fits have looked good with even the likes of vis. plus it tells the audience that you didn't spend all your expendable funds on cut and sewns.

 

sorry i really don't recall his other fits, and mainly it has nothing to do with whether he is poor or rich irl.  the point is that the chucks imo cheapen his fit.  they make little sense in the context of it.  they make the fit even more boring.

If hes going to stand up for hours, Rick Owens shoes aren't exactly the comfiest, but you probably already know that.

[SSchadenfreude]

If hes going to stand up for hours, Rick Owens shoes aren't exactly the comfiest, but you probably already know that.

vs. chucks?!?

 

i suppose this is all up for debate/personal pref, but imo rick owens sneakers are comfortable enough.  i've worn them 4 urban city treks and had no orthopedic prob

[landa]

oliver peoples (no vis)

blk dnm

balmain

cp

[teddybonkers]

vs. chucks?!?

 

i suppose this is all up for debate/personal pref, but imo rick owens sneakers are comfortable enough.  i've worn them 4 urban city treks and had no orthopedic prob

Your feet must have been washed by Jesus Christ himself.

[CASSAVA PIECE]

Your feet must have been washed by Jesus Christ himself.

 

do you understand context

[alexthephallus]

 

n(n) // ro // n(n) // ro

[only_time]

making my monthly post in this thread. Cassava piece, you seem like a massive bitch dude. Sorry man but someone needed to say it.

 

 

^ nice fit. How many velcros u scammed to cop those cargoes?

Edited September 25, 2014 by only_time

[I told a mod to fuck off]

oh 4 reals?

 

 

 09-21-2014, 04:04 PM   #44946

Landadel

Member

 

Join Date: Jul 2014

Location: Germany

Posts: 43

 

 

"I´m actually saving up for some Rick footwear"

 

http://stylezeitgeist.com/forums/showpost.php?p=471809&postcount=44946

 

according to yr quote on sz i thought u were "actually saving up for some Rick footwear."

did you kop two pairs of ramones in 3 days? my bad boo

 

lmao this fuckin nerd stalking sufu users on other fashion forums, taking the internet too serious