Jump to content

Levi's Vintage Clothing


Recommended Posts

On 8/10/2025 at 9:59 PM, TheJPdude said:

I didnt even know the 1922 was in the current lineup until I just now typed 1922 into the search bar on levis.com. if you try to look for them in the main LVC link, they are not part of the collection (just like my 1890!)

Unfortunately the only experience I have with the new MIJ/Kaihara models is my 1890s. Do the 1922 have the same fabric? IIRC, historically they made the switch to 10oz denim by then, right?

For my 1890, they ran oversized, but shrank a lot. my particular pair has a good amount of nep to them as well.

THANKS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/12/2025 at 2:58 PM, Paul T said:

These were really hard to wear in, almost no crocking with wear. THey are now my main summer jeans as I can't bear to retire my 1880s, which have now those little loose threads that signals that heavy repairs will soon be needed. 

 

 

oh boy, i was wondering how long it would take to fade out my 1890s. I'm only on wear #30 and of course, not even a hint of indigo loss. 

you're right that they make a fantastic summer jean; i've been cool as a cucumber over this past hot month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all,

Just picked up a pair of the new 1922 501s. Date code is the 38 week of 2024.  They just arrived. Here are some of my first thoughts. The denim Japanese denim is really nice. Rougher /more textured than the 1937 Japanese denim ones I picked up last year. The fit is baggy. Really full in the thighs and seat. The rise is also high. I really like the white line selvedge on these. I usually just wear raw but I think I will do a cold 30 min soak before wearing on this pair. 

Size is 36/34.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ That is quite some green coming through! I've never seen that on LVC's - is that common? (I know some models certainly seem to have a green cast, I just haven't seen anything quite like this is what I mean.)

Edited by ATWM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was trolling the old 'bay looking for a more modern cut of LVC to wear for this winter since my 1890 are only 9 oz. Found a pair of '54 rigid BNWT, so made an offer for 175 and was accepted. Just took delivery of them and build date is Week 52, 2021. 

 

36 x 32 pre-soak

Waist - 35 (!!!)

FR: 12"

thigh - 23"

hem - 8.25"

inseam: 31" (!!!)

 

I am pretty shocked at the dry measurements. Considering my 1890 were so *oversized* I wasn't expecting these to be so *undersized*

 

About to place these in a hot tub of water! post soak measurements will follow soon. 

Edited by TheJPdude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Post soak - 

waist - 17"

FR - 11.5"

RR - 15.9"

thigh 22.75"

hem - 8"

inseam - 29"

 

I definitely have to get to work on getting the waist to stretch out here. Was not expecting this at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TheJPdude said:

Post soak - 

waist - 17"

FR - 11.5"

RR - 15.9"

thigh 22.75"

hem - 8"

inseam - 29"

 

I definitely have to get to work on getting the waist to stretch out here. Was not expecting this at all. 

I‘ve got this 1954 too, same size. It‘s for sure on the smaller side but it will stretch. The 1954 is my favourite cut besides the 1967 505. This jean is perfectly made, a real highlight in the newer LVCs- every detail is correct and the denim is extremely hairy and soft after the presoak. A pleasure to wear.
 

IMG_6007.jpeg.a155655d5bd857208ea8ea72beea1942.jpeg

Edited by House md
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, House md said:

I‘ve got this 1954 too, same size. It‘s for sure on the smaller side but it will stretch. The 1954 is my favourite cut besides the 1967 505. This jean is perfectly made, a real highlight in the newer LVCs- every detail is correct and the denim is extremely hairy and soft after the presoak. A pleasure to wear.
 

IMG_6007.jpeg.a155655d5bd857208ea8ea72beea1942.jpeg

You are absolutely right. I went on a nice evening walk last night to try and loosen them up. Did some lunges and squats for the passerby as well, and that helped get these stretched back out. Measured the waist afterwards last night and I'm back up to a hair under 36".

It's definitely a great modern cut. I have some Naked and Famous/Unbranded in weird guy/tapered fit that measure really close to the 54s, but the nice addition to the 54 compared to these modern cuts is that the rear rise is a full 1.5 inches taller, which is imperative for not having your ass fall out when crouching or bending. A++

Heading off to my local raw denim shop to have them chain stitch hemmed with the ol' union special. I'll try to post pics when I get them back 

Edited by TheJPdude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, TheJPdude said:

Also @airfrogusmc gorgeous pair of '22 you have there. I am guessing those are ~10oz? Would make a nice lighter weight pair. 

Thanks and yeah 10 OZ. Sweet in the summer. The denim is a lot darker and rougher in texture than the 1937s I picked up last year. I am going to hold off as long as I can on washes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Washed

IMG_0405.thumb.jpeg.0e614172950f4750010a0e6500545ad8.jpeg

IMG_0406.thumb.jpeg.c52182555917c2ee35b1ab2dc97d7ca6.jpeg

The damage:

Back pocket where I keep my multitool

IMG_0407.thumb.jpeg.c7f37c84d5c14fc71b301837efeb7582.jpeg

IMG_0408.thumb.jpeg.c23bb67e7faad343768c781d74519605.jpeg

Wear on the thigh from my key rubbing through from the pocket, though the pocket bag itself is perfectly intact

IMG_0409.thumb.jpeg.a8f8e87f8b50870c1a1497225600cc28.jpeg

Crotch is going to blow out sometime soon, the thigh is only 12.25” so they’re a bit constricting when I have to get down on my knees or squat

IMG_0410.thumb.jpeg.5ba38cb28429947c2afaafb732d7efb8.jpeg

Finally, I love the crease on the fly placket

IMG_0411.thumb.jpeg.fd7b1931de5da96dbb65f6fe03a030f5.jpeg

 

Edited by bod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, what's up with the inside stitching of my 1890? Were 19th century denim made with all these loose threads? It's like this near the button fly, down the legs, and in the pockets.

image.thumb.jpeg.a0f04cebe3ad022da68fbeccc1acb682.jpeg 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Maynard Friedman said:

That’s period correct, they didn’t use overlock stitching back then.

Nice - glad to know they tuned into those details when making them. I thought they were starting to fall apart!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...