Photography Post Vol. 2

[passant]

[destructodisk]

The sky in your 2nd and 3rd pics look amazing Destructo. Where were those taken?

Thanks man. They were taken out on Block Island, RI just after an amazing storm.

Apparently they're rare mammatocumulus clouds, so I took some shots that turned out way better than I expected.

[likewtfyo]

selectivebeef, those pictures look really saturated. photoshopped or white balance?

[dino might]

shitty picture, i'd just like to know whats going on here..

[walleye]

[reka5matik]

[totally epic]

After returning from a weekend on the Olympic Peninsula.

Lake Crescent

Marymere Falls

Dead Trees

Foggy Beach

[speedcat]

New York City Street outside MoMA.

New York City as shot from Central Park.

My neighborhood, from the inside of a car.

All taken from a Casio Exilim Digital Camera, 4.0 megapixels, no photoshop.

I'm just that good, haha.. Joking! Any input would be greatly appreciated.

[mike lowrey]

this looks amazing, wouldn't mind seeing a slightly larger one

All taken from a Casio Exilim Digital Camera, 4.0 megapixels, no photoshop.

I'm just that good, haha.. Joking! Any input would be greatly appreciated.

if the first image was taken with the 4mp casio then its pretty impressive. in all honesty, the others seem like pocket camera snapshots, I dont know what I could really comment on

[totally epic]

Here's a larger one. Flickr tends to sharpen as they size down, so this looks slightly less sharp but it's exactly how sharp I wanted it to be.

[C0C0]

[notesee]

Nice shots epic and coco.

[still]

some polaroids i took at nyc.. just got a new sx-70 but it tends to overexpose alot. the film expired in 2003.. found them for 50 cents a pack at a local thrift store

times square

(unknown)

(soho)

wall st.

canal st.

coney island

coney island

coney island station

number (n)ine store

[nairb49]

only one photo shows up for me... coney island station. would love to see the others though.

[jayrock]

whoa! those turned out pretty neat!

[still]

only one photo shows up for me... coney island station. would love to see the others though.

works fine for me.. just refresh they should show up. imageshack seemed to be slow recently

[joey_formal]

nothing special just boredom

[Felix]

[likewtfyo]

good stuff felix. love the details on the dunes.

[theamapros]

[dino might]

^i love that.

and felix, youre photos give me a bit of that hopeless romantic vibe.

but im going to be annoying now. what to buy: the rebel xti 10MP or the eos 30d 8MP?

[totally epic]

[theamapros]

^i love that.

and felix, youre photos give me a bit of that hopeless romantic vibe.

but im going to be annoying now. what to buy: the rebel xti 10MP or the eos 30d 8MP?

thanks man!

as for your camera question, i'm a nikon man myself, but i'd vote for the 30d. i've seen your pictures in the waywt thread and you seem like a pretty big guy, and people have often complained about the smaller body on the rebel xti.

if you have some extra time on your hands, go to http://dpreview.com, i consult this site before i make any major camera purchase.

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1214/1263303716_7b51c37b46_o.jpg

breathtaking shit! where was this taken at?

[totally epic]

^^Lake Crescent in the Olympic Peninsula.

I have a Rebel XTi and it is pretty small, but with the battery grip it works out.

[mrcheesecakelin]

please place pictures on separate rows!

[munch crunch]

[dino might]

if you have some extra time on your hands, go to http://dpreview.com, i consult this site before i make any major camera purchase.

thanks for the tip

[C0C0]

[totally epic]

[mike lowrey]

but im going to be annoying now. what to buy: the rebel xti 10MP or the eos 30d 8MP?

I have big-ass hands and the 400D (xti) works perfect in terms of size, I guess some are just used to a chunkier body maybe?

the difference between those two is not that big, the xti has a couple of more mp's making the biggest image size slightly bigger, very little difference though. same sensors and image processors.. 30D also has the 1.6x cropping, so I think the biggest difference would be the enhanced ISO up to 3200 vs. the 1600 on the xti. I havent tested that so couldn't say how different it is, judging from sample images the 3200 is pretty noisy though. the camera body size is slightly bigger on the 30D, 1.7lbs vs. 1.2lbs.

edit: kind of forgot my conclusion

as swooc said below, I'd also get the 400D and use the rest on a lens, the body at this level makes much less of a difference than lenses.