Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Oh, sorry, lost my temper. Bad day. I think I misunderstood! I don't even remember what I was thinking. But yes, it's true it's gambling to buy stuff on ebay, and weird to ask about the size afterwards. I think I have built up some frustration with some forum members who like to show off how much money they have, but I don't think you are a Russian oligarch or anything like that:) Sorry, I will behave from now on.
Edited by gululv
Posted

Just picked this up. It reminds me of the s614. The fit is not as narrow or as short rise as i though it would be.

Actually it fits better than the old 906. I haven't soaked yet, so it is a bit roomy.

jmc991xh1.jpg

jmc991xh3.jpg

jmc991xh4.jpg

jmc991xh5.jpg

jmc991xh7.jpg

jmc991xh8.jpg

jmc991xh9.jpg

Posted

Fits good… there's no hip flare, the rise is medium, not low and the leg is narrow but not tapered. I think of it as a slightly more narrowed leg '47 fit. I'll post a fit ice after I soak or wash.

Posted

I'm not sure how you like to rock them. I'm the kind of person who like their jeans a little looser.

I guess you could go with the same size. I just remember the old 906 having a gigantic waist and little itty bitty thighs.

Posted

yeah quite tight on the thgihs i like em a bit loose thoug i like my jeans like tube but not as baggy as a 47 cut should i consider this pair?

Posted

Not as baggy as a 47 due to the mid rise. Might not fit into your biker steez, but its different, at least for me. I don't normally get such a narrow fit. The denim is gorgeous and heavy.

Posted

Indeed^ im eager to see fit pics too. I have seen the 991XH described as a slim cut and the same silhouette as the original 991 with a hard taper and low rise, on the other hand i have seen the .003 are described as a tight-fit?

Clear as mud.

Posted

No problem, I gotta soak 'em first.

I believe in the bigger sizes that isn't much of a problem. Since I rock a size 36, the measurements are similar to a lot of my other jeans (like a Warehouse 660) give or take a half inch and with a slightly smaller leg opening.

Posted

Coleslaw. Since we wear the same size, I'm keen to see fit pics and measurents if its not too much bother.

No problem, I'll do so when I get a chance.

Here are the measurements after a hot soak for an hour. i only used hot tap water. I'm sure by sticking it in the dryer will get smaller results. I only throw them in the machine after about 3 months of wear.

Measured taunt.

991XH tagged size 36

After Soak

Waist: 47 cm

Front Rise: 29 cm

Back Rise 36 cm

Upper Thigh: 32 cm

Knee: 23 cm

Leg Opening: 22 cm

Hemmed Inseam: 81 cm

Posted (edited)

Going on coles sizing and my penchant for amature mathamatics i have worked out the shrinkage factor for the 991XH

Here goes it...38.5" waist divide by contraction factor of "1.0404255" gives you 47cm across the waistband.

I am confident that all denim is an "exact science ;) " so this factor can be applied to all 991XH sizes

Eg) Size 34" big size chart 37.5" waist or 953mm divide by 2 = 476.5mm divide by the factor 1.0404255 gives a post shrink waist of 18" across the waistband.

Post shrink 32"= 427.7mm across waistband.

And so on.

Edited by Double 0 Soul
Posted (edited)

the fit is superb, i guess they just arent designed for my unusually thick thighs.

Edited by a.khan12390

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...