Photography Post Vol. 2

[(10chars)]

broke my dslr. back to my s90. hello noisy pictures..

this camera has been through hell.. surprised it is still working. enjoying it though.

[koven]

inneexx2233333 by MrEllis, on Flickr

[rockon99]

great shots everyone

this blows my mind really hard

[koven]

amazing ^^

[party pooped]

fashion *nightmare* week...

[(10chars)]

just took these lol

good stuff everyone

[koven]

[fade to black2]

[koven]

Hate to post these again but these are the high res versions

up by MrEllis, on Flickr

? by MrEllis, on Flickr

[laxlife1234]

[party pooped]

[joelz]

hey party pooped - where do you get your film developed and scanned? anyone else in NY feel free to weigh in... places that do 120 film too is a bonus.

[party pooped]

hey party pooped - where do you get your film developed and scanned? anyone else in NY feel free to weigh in... places that do 120 film too is a bonus.

For snaps and b-rolls, I just take them to walgreens. negatives are processed in 15min for $4.

I take my projects and medium/large format films to L&I Photo on 22nd between 5th and 6th ave. They are typical pro lab prices, $7 for 35mm, etc. They're great people there.

Or shoot black and white and process at home for free.

[joelz]

cool, thanks for the info. i've got an F3 on loan from a friend so am trying to figure out where to get stuff done that's good/fast/decently priced.

here are some shots from the first roll

[julianmontez]

[dreadite]

Anyone seen one of these? Looks like a lot of fun:

http://microsites.lomography.com/sprocketrocket/

[DüM]

For snaps and b-rolls, I just take them to walgreens. negatives are processed in 15min for $4.

I take my projects and medium/large format films to L&I Photo on 22nd between 5th and 6th ave. They are typical pro lab prices, $7 for 35mm, etc. They're great people there.

Or shoot black and white and process at home for free.

(obviously you're in NY, I'm in the middle of nowhere but) I took a few rolls to Walgreen's and I'm sure the processing was fine, but their scans were unusable. I'm copping a scanner soon though.

few more from sf, with various amounts of pressing too many buttons in Lightroom

[Killypants]

Portrait by Killypants, on Flickr

Eats by Killypants, on Flickr

Car paint by Killypants, on Flickr

^just found out that the woman to whom this car belongs lost her infant son like a year ago, and painted it in his remembrance.

[laxlife1234]

Very similar image to yesterday, but not the same photo and has different processing. I also converted it to B&W. I am definitely in love with this one.

[joelz]

i dunno lax, i like the colors of the previous one better, the light is just perfect that it doesn't need a b&w treatment...

[laxlife1234]

I guess we all have our personal opinions! That is what I love about art I mean I do like both just that I find (to myself) the B&W is more appealing. Plus, i was just messing around and testing out my abilities with HDR.

[dani303]

IMG_2780 by daniela_in_dc, on Flickr

IMG_2754 by daniela_in_dc, on Flickr

IMG_2796 by daniela_in_dc, on Flickr

IMG_2834 by daniela_in_dc, on Flickr

IMG_3057 by daniela_in_dc, on Flickr

[asimplefarmer]

shootin with xcoalesce

[FabGeek]

very nice, what setup did you use?

[Rob060]

[Rob060]

[party pooped]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Möðrudalur

[FabGeek]

Okay, so I'm a photo editor for a magazine and I'm doing shots for their editorial profiles. Please critique as what's working/ needs improvement.

[asimplefarmer]

very nice, what setup did you use?

I used a beauty dish almost straight on and then a white reflector underneath:D

[Rob060]

the second one has better lighting, though her hair gets cut off. narrow lighting is more flattering for women. make sure there's a defined shadow on one side of her face. make sure the eyes are nicely lit.

some spot removal/retouching obviously.

will the images just be small headers like 1-2" at the top of the article? i'm thinking a solid background would probably be better. white is good because it'll blend with the color of the pages [if they're white] and the only solid visible edge of the photo rests on top of the text that follows.