Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Between the Junky '46 and the SCSC '46, there was the MiUSA S1946! The trouble is: I have no idea when or where I got them, and can't find any photos besides these from just a couple years ago when I used them to test out some possible pizza arcs pre-contest (they went on much higher up than intended, but besides that I do think I like how the design ended up). Will pull them back out and take a more thorough round of photos next time I think of it. Really weird cut; they never seemed to fit right. Really weird fabric, too: reminded me of their old “slack denim” that I think b_F might still have a pair of

IMG_1036.thumb.jpeg.9524bc85b672da8669c2975a7bc02e59.jpeg

IMG_1038.thumb.jpeg.b197c5856ff3a2639857c8c0b67e65c9.jpeg

IMG_1037.thumb.jpeg.542058114a026328979a80f501b4cd68.jpeg

IMG_1039.thumb.jpeg.68b26d9ec3dbe1923e8c8e3fd6b1c19d.jpeg

Posted

There was 2x pairs of 46s that came out at the same time, one was by SC the other by WH, both were copied from the same pair of 46s from the Toyo vault.. the WH had a longer runoff.. i can't remember if the SC version was MiA tho.. and wasn't there a pair with crazy-long unsnipped threads and a jacket to match?

Posted

^ These were the ones with the crazy long threads, and I do think there was a matching jacket. Don’t think there was a corresponding MiJ set, but could def. be mistaken 

Posted

MIUSA 1944 from around that time also had very OTT run off threads everywhere, and on the jacket.

Pic of my SCSC 1946 to contribute

SG102445.thumb.JPG.23c7649d8e93dce96e2965cb5498b328.JPG

Posted (edited)

Found some SC S1946 fit pics from right after their first soak

They looked great at the time; maybe my thighs outgrew them? I'm a little slimmer again now, might need to try them on again just in case

2022-10-1212_27_54.thumb.jpg.87f1281f0e5d9254075fa4a1c64c32d5.jpg

2022-10-1212_28_08.thumb.jpg.a8d21eaf1b5bc9b84575585a814c776c.jpg

2022-10-1212_28_23.thumb.jpg.b7f7a52ea313b43a59e14c9bfe3a6530.jpg

feat. Tezo, Hollows, Russell

edit: Pics show up blurry in-place but look fine if you click on them (???)

Edited by julian-wolf
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
20 hours ago, Double 0 Soul said:

Nice! .. I won't pretend to understand the differences in WH denim :rolleyes:

Yes, it's quite opaque.
I think it's kind of like this: They've had the banner denim (7x7) and the heavier Memphis (6x6) one.
Then like five years ago they came out with the "new denim" in 6.7 x 6.6 with the orange selvedge and I think, it was also called WWII denim.
And then they released the DSB, which they described as their pinnacle, with the oxidation effect, kind of similar to "time machine" of Oe for instance, I think.
And the DSB also comes in two weights, 7.5x7.5 and 6.7 x 6.6 both with pink selvedge. And the heavier one is being used for WWII models and the lighter ones for issues like 1947 or 1954 for example.
Now, whether the "new denim" with orange selvedge that had been used for the 1946 and 1944 models has been replaced by the heavier DSB (with pink sl.) or whether that is another non oxidised option now, I'm not sure.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

fuck yeah. from the opaque, fuzzy whiskers they must fit comfy too?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...