Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

everyone else, dont worry about his pair, theyre just dirty, if they got washed they wouldnt look that far ahead, so everyone stay in it!

Exactly. I might actually wash (or most likely soak) these this weekend to better show off the lack of evo.

On that note, are there any good tricks to shooting jeans? I just got a new camera (Panny LX3), so want to start using it. I notice alot of shots in the evo thread taken with jeans on grass or concrete. Is this for better contrast between jeans and background? I'm in the process of putting in a patio at the side of my parents house (while wearing in my LVC's no less), so maybe I should take a few shots of the jeans on that.

Posted

Just taking pictures outside in the natural sunlight is the best.. early morning and in the afternoon, because direct sunlight isnt ideal either tho..

The light is the most important part, as with any photography, so dont worry too much about the ground.

Posted

X posted from photos only:

1967 505xx, 3 month update (March 2010).

Daily wear, no washes yet. Started a new job last summer, and the best thing about it is that I don't have to wear a suit everyday. It's now a desk job, but at least I get to wear my jeans.

196750520100307sufu01.jpg

196750520100307sufu04.jpg

Photos taken in my crypt (condo) in indirect sunlight. These are pretty stubborn, but they're starting to fade in the combs and whiskers. Couple things I don't like are the massive kneebags, and length. I will probably get them hemmed, but will wait until after the first wash. However, I do wear these with a big / double cuff quite often and don't really want to lose that utility with a hem.

Otherwise they're starting to get 'shiny', and I love it. I'll probably hold off a wash for a while, because I really like the contrast that's just starting to come out.

Posted

my jeans (501 - 1978) are falling apart already after approx. 2,5 months of wear. the denim and the "construction" was pretty lame. dont think they gonna last for this competition.

Posted

you clearly need to post pictures of what (has) happened to them

Posted

Tough...definitely post some pics, prochek. I recall cheep dissuading me from those, but that had more to do with the fabric.

Posted

I just realised it's been 2 months since my last update, so I snapped some quick pics. Sorry they suck, it's too bright out.

imgp3224.jpg

^Worse case of moose knuckle since Bullwinkle, and they're not even tight in the crotch. What's the deal with those wrinkles that form from the fly placket down to the inner thigh?

imgp3225.jpg

^I think this is what Markus calls 'ass eats jeans' lol.

I'm at 3 months of light wear now. Will definitely be wearing them more when the weather cools.

Will take better detail shots for the official thread when the light's better.

Posted

^lol yeah I'll try to get some more up once there are more visible changes...nothing really going on since my last update a week ago to be honest although the knees are really starting to break in...

Posted
La Ropa!

Wow that is coming along really nicely!

Posted

did you downsize alot?? many LVC's are lighter weight denim then most so sizing down alot could lead to fatal crotch blowouts

Posted
Is it normal that the crotch gets all riped up after 2 months of wear? ..or just poor denim?

no, you probably were wearing them too tight.

Posted
no, you probably were wearing them too tight.

no, actually the top block sits pretty loose. It´s the first time this happen to me and I have been wearing different LVC jeans for a long time.

Posted
no, actually the top block sits pretty loose. It´s the first time this happen to me and I have been wearing different LVC jeans for a long time.

hmm...

what model are they? were they tight when you first soaked them? its possible they have stretched out to a comfy size but are tight around the crotch area.

but it is also possible that you got a faulty pair.

I had a pair of 47s that had crotch issues because they were too tight, but they fit fine at the waist.

but my 37s are over a year old with no crotch problems at all.

post some pics, lets see whats goin on. maybe you can take em back.

Posted

they are 78s so it´s a more slimmer cut, almost the same as 505 but with a lower waist, and I have no problem with my 505s, 66s or 47s.

Emailed Dejan with pictures but he will not return them =/

maybe I re-join with a new pair :)

Posted

Too bad about the 78's...post more pictures! For some reason I recall cheap saying that the 78's were pretty bad quality but maybe thats all in my head?

Posted
Too bad about the 78's...post more pictures! For some reason I recall cheap saying that the 78's were pretty bad quality but maybe thats all in my head?

I remember that. It was the denim itself...I don't recall him mentioning any construction issues. I think his are true vintage though, not LVC.

Posted
Hey Medine,

Thought you might enjoy seeing these. 47s with added suspender buttons.

haha you saying that cuz i took my buttons off??

Posted

Credit for this photo should go to Roy6 who posted it on the LVC thread. (Apologies for not crediting it before.) It is of someone who works at Unionmade in San Francisco.

Hey Medine,

Thought you might enjoy seeing these. 47s with added suspender buttons.

4427498813_684225abb9_o.jpg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...