Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
^ nice. you look good with slim jeans, too.

Thanks ....it's so hot over here that I prefer wearing loose Jeans right now - a bit of air really makes the difference ..it's been in the high 80's - 90's here, for the last 2 months...it's like living in Cuba.....

Posted

i hear you. i switch my denim during the cold winter months to heavier ones, even though i still haven't acquired anything over 15oz, but.

the rest of the year, i wear medium weight denim. if it gets really hot, i go a bit baggy sometimes. like my evisu.

Posted
I think the answer to question #1 is, no.

Question 2 is definitely no. They're just as irregular and fun, but the stiffness drops off after a soak. Before soaking, mine cut the backs of my knees when I went for bike rides, after soaking they did not.

thanks! i was originally going for a pair of black sammys but when i tried it on, my girl thought it was too baggy... somehow i ended up with the XX-005BKs... then my girl found out how much it costs... now instead of -250, i'm @ -$520... next time she stays home...

but yeah, i was hoping it stays as stubby as it is right now... i was gonna wait a little bit before i do a soak because it fits perfectly right now. BUT the leg opening is a little too big. It ends up dragging slighty on the floor... hopefully it shrinks enough so it wont drag anymore but not so much that i wont be able to fit my fat ass in...

Posted

I too attest that they hold their slubbiness. Mine have been soaked twice and machine washed once. Still slubby. I actually find that after a few weeks of wearing the thighs and lap get rubbed kinda smooth; a good soaking removes the dirt and seems to pop the slubs right back up. I think this is also a great reason people see better fades after a good washing and more wear.

Posted

okay i've been reading all thru this bitch and i can't come to a decision. i realize that the 005 is slimmer than the 003, but the 003 seems to be a bit baggy for my likeing and the 005 a bit slim. I wear a 32 in lvc '47, and i like the fit of them a lot. if i got the 003 i would probably go size 30, or size 32 in the 005? i like the 47s but maybe with a slimmer hem which is why im thinking the 005

can someone help me out

Posted
okay i've been reading all thru this bitch and i can't come to a decision. i realize that the 005 is slimmer than the 003, but the 003 seems to be a bit baggy for my likeing and the 005 a bit slim. I wear a 32 in lvc '47, and i like the fit of them a lot. if i got the 003 i would probably go size 30, or size 32 in the 005? i like the 47s but maybe with a slimmer hem which is why im thinking the 005

can someone help me out

I would say go for the sized up 005. The 003 will always be too baggy for you, and if you try to size down with them it will look awkward, not to mention the extra stress on the waistband/crotch.

Posted

okay so i just measured my waist, 32 in. so if i go with a 32 in the 005 they won't be to slim, would you advise going with a 33? i just don't want them to be tight. i'd like a little room

Posted

i soaked them in 160 degrees water... now i got black rings all over my bathtub... i was hoping the hem strinks more but not enough... still draggin on the floor sometimes...

Almost perfect fit... a little more room in the crotch area would be better... 9 out of 10 friends can see which way my penis hangs....

Posted
okay so i just measured my waist, 32 in. so if i go with a 32 in the 005 they won't be to slim, would you advise going with a 33? i just don't want them to be tight. i'd like a little room

if you want the little bit of room, I would suggest sizing up in the 005 cut..

Considering how slim the cut is, you can size up for comfort, and not have to worry at all about 'swimming' in your jeans.

especially because you don't want this:

a little more room in the crotch area would be better... 9 out of 10 friends can see which way my penis hangs....

i mean, unless you do, haha

Posted

Almost perfect fit... a little more room in the crotch area would be better... 9 out of 10 friends can see which way my penis hangs....

hahaha, sig-worthy

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Can anyone with a size 30 or 31 xx005s post the pant waist measurements after a few weeks or months of wear? I'm split between the 30" and 31" but nobody has yet posted waist measurements on the jeans after a hot soak or two and a few weeks of wear, only just post soak measurements. I'd like to know what each size has stretched to before I bite the bullet.

My upper thigh is only 20" so even the size 30" with a 11.5" post shrink upper thigh might be just loose enough around my legs (similar to the 31" imperial dukes upper thigh), but the waist might be too small.

I keep landing on this thread at least once a month to make up my mind on getting these or not. :(

Posted

Mine are W 30 / bought one wash state, so they were really a 30 to begin with , and have stretched about 2 inches already.

And I only wear these very few weeks

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

sorry if this has been asked before but is there more than 1 version of these jeans or are they all Shrink To Fit?

http://blueingreensoho.com says they are STF but...my problem is they say sz 28 is actually 30" pre-washed and will only shrink to 28" after a few washes. but i am size 27-28 only so what am i supposed to do exactly?

Thanks

Posted
Can anyone with a size 30 or 31 xx005s post the pant waist measurements after a few weeks or months of wear? I'm split between the 30" and 31" but nobody has yet posted waist measurements on the jeans after a hot soak or two and a few weeks of wear, only just post soak measurements. I'd like to know what each size has stretched to before I bite the bullet.

My upper thigh is only 20" so even the size 30" with a 11.5" post shrink upper thigh might be just loose enough around my legs (similar to the 31" imperial dukes upper thigh), but the waist might be too small.

I keep landing on this thread at least once a month to make up my mind on getting these or not. :(

Well, my one-wash size 31 pbjs xx-005's stretched to about 32.5 inches after 2-3 weeks of wear. My waist measures about 31.5 inches two inches bellow my belly button, and the pbjs were extremely tight in the waist when I first put them on. For reference, I'm 6'1'' and 150lbs. You seem pretty skinny, so I would recommend sizing down one size from your true waist size. Be advised that these aren't the most comfortable jeans especially in the crotch area. Good luck with your purchase.

Posted
Be advised that these aren't the most comfortable jeans especially in the crotch area. Good luck with your purchase.

yeah... the crotch area is kinda tight... either that or my junk is pretty big... which i highly doubt. i broke the chain stitching in 2 places down there... and its only been a month of wear...

Posted
yeah... the crotch area is kinda tight... either that or my junk is pretty big... which i highly doubt. i broke the chain stitching in 2 places down there... and its only been a month of wear...

I think the combination of the lowrise and the thick fabric at the crotch contributes to the uncomfort. It doesn't bother me too much, but pbjs are also notorious for their crotch bulge, which is definitely visible while sitting down :rolleyes: .

Posted

FWIW I went with my true waist 34 and they fit great everywhere but the waist. I have to wear a belt but that's OK. They are still a nice slim fit but not so tight that I have experienced the problems others have had. Very nice jeans.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Hi guys, wanted to share a quick update on my xx005's. It's been a little over a year and several machine washes + dryer. The back was shot with more shade to compare colors under different lighting....no flash in any photos.

IMG_0128.jpg

IMG_0127.jpg

IMG_0145.jpg

IMG_0132.jpg

IMG_0134.jpg

IMG_0153.jpg

Posted
Mine are W 30 / bought one wash state, so they were really a 30 to begin with , and have stretched about 2 inches already.

And I only wear these very few weeks

so...sizing down is not a bad idea?

Posted

i think just size down 1.. thats what im gonna do with my pbj 005 ill order from take 5...

Posted
so...sizing down is not a bad idea?

i wouldnt size down. these are very tight jeans. stretching two inch in the waist doesnt mean that it stretches up a size all over. they will pretty much be stockings if you size down

Posted

hahha yeah and beatle dont have balls to crush.. so i say dont size down..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...