Jump to content

Are our jeans doing their job?


dmaz

Recommended Posts

We all know that denim jeans were initially designed to be workwear, but can our beloved double ringspun, rope dyed, edo/ai pure indigo, hand cut and sewn in Japan, single-cropped organic selvage, really stand up to the quality they and everyone else advertises? I see crotches getting blown out, chainstiching unraveling, pocket stitching coming undone, back pockets coming off, etc. I would like some opinions on what jeans have stood the abuse it takes to get beautiful the fading/story we love.

My limited experience involves 5ep, Pure Blue Japan, and Samurai. I've been wearing my PBJ's everyday for the last 2 months and the crotch stitching is starting to rip ala Carl's and the chainstitch at one hem is unraveling. The Samurai 5000vx that I had, the pocket stitching was coming out just like everyone elses. Fortunately, I have had my 5ep's for exactly a year, and NOTHING is wrong with them. They are truly tough-ass jeans and I know I got my money's worth.

Everyone else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It probably has something to do with the fact that workers didn't downsize their jeans a few sizes to get the superfuture fit.

Tight fit + not washing for too long = bad combination for workwear. If you want your jeans to last you should either not wear them the SuFu way or you should wash them once a month or so.

Having two pairs that you alternate between will do wonders too, and not just because you get twice less wear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, to begin with, a lot of the Japanese companies use pure cotton thread, to simulate original construction methods. Modern companies (including 5EP, which imo, blends great denim with great modern construction, imo) use cotton covered poly thread, for the most part, which has more stretch, will not fray as easily, and is just plain tougher. Also, what constitutes "better denim" is very subjective. Certainly, better /= more durable. Super slubby denim, for example, is going to abrade much faster than smooth denim, thus the problems with Pure Blue Japans.

I think that it is funny that there are always posts about Pure Blue Japans bowing out at the crotch, and yet durability is often cited as the reason people like the Japanese brands and shit on brands like Seven. The interesting thing about many of the Japanese brands is the denim itself, not the hardware (in many cases, mediocre,) the design (the fit of Samurais suck on most people, to be frank), nor the construction. And the great thing about the Japanese denim is that it looks, feels, great, not that it lasts any longer than, say, Turkish denim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

downsizing is the culprit. Most people who bought workwear bought it slightly oversized and wore suspenders or a belt. Look around even today, every construction worker, kitchen helper/plumber/mechanic wears a belt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

downsizing is the culprit. Most people who bought workwear bought it slightly oversized and wore suspenders or a belt. Look around even today, every construction worker, kitchen helper/plumber/mechanic wears a belt.

SO RIGHT! workwear was never ment to be downsized. If you've seen some pics of vintage levis/jeans from the 20's 30's ect, you will notice they are baggy or large. Also i dont think they biked or skateboarded in them doing kickflips or other sports while wearing jeans. Thats my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, to begin with, a lot of the Japanese companies use pure cotton thread, to simulate original construction methods. Modern companies (including 5EP, which imo, blends great denim with great modern construction, imo) use cotton covered poly thread, for the most part, which has more stretch, will not fray as easily, and is just plain tougher. Also, what constitutes "better denim" is very subjective. Certainly, better /= more durable. Super slubby denim, for example, is going to abrade much faster than smooth denim, thus the problems with 5EP.

I think that it is funny that there are always posts about Pure Blue Japans bowing out at the crotch, and yet durability is often cited as the reason people like the Japanese brands and shit on brands like Seven. The interesting thing about many of the Japanese brands is the denim itself, not the hardware (in many cases, mediocre,) the design (the fit of Samurais suck on most people, to be frank), nor the construction. And the great thing about the Japanese denim is that it looks, feels, great, not that it lasts any longer than, say, Turkish denim.

Interesting points LA Guy and everyone else. I didn't know 5ep used cotton coated poly threads (though I knew they were different), that explains the durability. I totally agree that the Japanese jeans excel in denim and dyeing, but are not necessarily more durable in construction/hardware. But it IS funny how everyone goes Japanese for quality and durability. I had many pairs of diesel jeans years ago that I beat to hell, and could still probably still wear them to this day.

So what I've gathered from this forum is that Sugarcane, 45rpm, APC, and 5ep are among the best blends of overall quality.

Watchman - front pocket stitching shouldn't be coming out on 90% of Sammies

Link to comment
Share on other sites

et tu ddml? ;)

plenty of interesting points brought up in the thread - something i've always wondered as well, especially since i often have to justify my expenditure on jeans to my own nagging conscience. to what extent are we actually paying for quality (in the long-lasting sense)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the backpocket stitchings on many japanese brands, including samurais, are designed to come off relatively easily. it's an intentional effect people look for as they wear out their jeans.

and i think people are spot on about downsizing and the effect on pbjs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
Its simple-

Any sized down jean + sagging = crotch blowouts.

no, let's not use the fit as a scape goat.

Cowboys didn't wear their jeans sized up. They wore them shrink to fit as tight as possible. They used it as the workwear it was meant for. Yet the crotch didn't blow out.

Also, work jeans are not washed as frequenly as everyday jeans. If a worker gets his jeans dirty every day, why would he wash them so they can get dirty 5 minutes later. So infrequent washing is not to blame either.

The answer is simple.

our jeans are not doing their jobs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are people saying cowboys/workers didn't get crotch blowouts? Look at vintage levis on ebay, lots of them have repairs, as stated earlier, and often around the seat and crotch.

I do think that skating puts a lot of stress on the crotch seam.

I have noticed on some of my jeans that the bottom of the piece of fabric where the fly buttons are attached, the corner at the j-stitch, rubs against the fabric from the back making a hole in the crotch, often after a short time. This has happened on "regular" fit jeans as well as superfuture fit ones; I think it is a design problem in how that piece of fabric is cut and sewed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no, let's not use the fit as a scape goat.

Cowboys didn't wear their jeans sized up. They wore them shrink to fit as tight as possible. They used it as the workwear it was meant for. Yet the crotch didn't blow out.

Also, work jeans are not washed as frequenly as everyday jeans. If a worker gets his jeans dirty every day, why would he wash them so they can get dirty 5 minutes later. So infrequent washing is not to blame either.

The answer is simple.

our jeans are not doing their jobs

I would agree to some extent. I think fit is not 100%, but does contribute.

Very good counterpoints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, Tang.

Just the fact that they spent all their time in the saddle would have led to faster wear in the crotch- much like the effect riding a bike alot in your jeans has.

I wasn't around in the time of the cowboys (although my younger friends would probably make cracks along those lines), but I doubt if they wore their jeans as tight as possible. Anyone using jeans as workwear needed room to move in them.

I have many pair of dry denim, and the only ones that the crotch blew out on are the ones that I sagged. It puts much more strain on the exact spot where the seams come together, and that combined with the abrading that you described will result in blowouts happening sooner than if the jeans are worn with no sag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...