Curious to see what yall think of these

[viv1984viv]

the animation is for the shirt i got on.

btw nobody got it right, niether guess nor azzure

and i kinda figured nobody would like em here. just curious to how bad you would think they were lol. cause i value no ones opinion and ima wear what i like regardless. thanks for the responses. these jeans cost me a whopping $15 8gasp* id rather not spend a stack on jeans, the most id pay is a lil over 100. im more of a sneaker fiend than a denim fiend, just here for the knowledge

no offence intended but if your more of a sneaker guy,

"im more of a sneaker fiend than a denim fiend,"

and you value nobodys opinion

"cause i value no ones opinion and ima wear what i like regardless."

then why oh why are you asking for opinions on a denim forum?????????????????

[xcoldricex]

dont try to personally attack me, keep it moving, you dont know me

jeez, i was just wondering. ooh lemme guess, are you TI?

[Yet Fung]

the animation is for the shirt i got on.

btw nobody got it right, niether guess nor azzure

and i kinda figured nobody would like em here. just curious to how bad you would think they were lol. cause i value no ones opinion and ima wear what i like regardless. thanks for the responses. these jeans cost me a whopping $15 8gasp* id rather not spend a stack on jeans, the most id pay is a lil over 100. im more of a sneaker fiend than a denim fiend, just here for the knowledge

Good to know that the animation is for a shirt when you're posting on a forum about denim. I'll be sure to ignore all further animations. And if you're not interested in anyone's opinions, then why post asking for them? Oh wait, you only asked to not be flamed, right. Sorry, I guess you should have posted asking for compliments. Great jeans btw. Happy now? I didn't guess what kind of jeans they were, but I'm guessing i don't care, want to take a guess as to whether I'm right or not?

Seriously no offense but if you were here for the knowledge, you would have just kept reading posts until you figured out that posting a pair of $15 pre-washed pre-distressed "surprise it's so-and-so's brand" denim wasn't going to do anything but get you a whole bag of WTF.

Congratulations Fat Stacks.

[joey_formal]

i garantee nobody here can mess with my sneaker game. if you didnt like what you saw...fine, state ur opinon on the jeans and thats it. dont try to personally attack me, keep it moving, you dont know me

plenty of us on here can "mess with your sneaker game" those GR af1's dont really speak volumes for your kicks collection. as for the jeans, they look like they cost $15 its a cheap guess knock off, nothing to be too proud of enjoy them though, you might really like Levi's Strauss Signature line at target.

[snugglepony]

i garantee [sic] nobody here can mess with my sneaker game.

[stupid pony]what's a sneaker game?[/stupid pony]

so what kind of $15 jeans did you score? please answer so this thread can go away.

welcome to the future!

[newone757]

no offence intended but if your more of a sneaker guy,

"im more of a sneaker fiend than a denim fiend,"

and you value nobodys opinion

"cause i value no ones opinion and ima wear what i like regardless."

then why oh why are you asking for opinions on a denim forum?????????????????

cuz i obviously dont know as much about denim as mucvh as yall so im askin the experts whatthey thought of em. it doesnt bother me that you trash the jeans but some of yall tried to personally attack me like im askin what you think about me. be my guess, trash the jeans, im still gonna wear em regardless, im not lossin any sleep on whether you like em or not.

and its funny how yet fung actaully take the time to write a legnthy reply incorporating everything i said a flaming so eloquently as if he was doin an english paper. yall put so much enthusiasm into hating , i love it. analyzing every word i type, being such perfect critics. keep comin with the hate. i enjoy the attention

[newone757]

plenty of us on here can "mess with your sneaker game" those GR af1's dont really speak volumes for your kicks collection. as for the jeans, they look like they cost $15 its a cheap guess knock off, nothing to be too proud of enjoy them though, you might really like Levi's Strauss Signature line at target.

too bad they aint gr's (they just some mens premiums but still, no gr's). plus they just my year old beaters, couldnt care less bout the tuxes

[newone757]

Good to know that the animation is for a shirt when you're posting on a forum about denim. I'll be sure to ignore all further animations.

it was for a what you wear today thread on a different shoe forum. just added it for a glimpse at the fit of the jeans and kinda introduce myself seein as im new. it really isnt that serious, you mad cuz i posted an animation featuring a shirt on a denim forum?? wow

[joey_formal]

well congrats.

[newone757]

^^^thanks?

what part of va you from?

[Yet Fung]

it was for a what you wear today thread on a different shoe forum. just added it for a glimpse at the fit of the jeans and kinda introduce myself seein as im new. it really isnt that serious, you mad cuz i posted an animation featuring a shirt on a denim forum?? wow

No I'm mad cuz you chose to talk back to me, the fact that you put up a lame animation just made you an easy target. Believe me I didn't even come close to taking you seriously. Go ahead and quote whatever parts of my post you want to. You wanted my opinion, you got it. You dont' like it, too bad, I'm not changing it on account of your sensitivity. Goodbye Shortstack.

[newone757]

yes keep pushing my thread in which yall hate so much , straight to the top. i love it

if you aint take me seriously then you wouldnt have taken time outta your life to respond

more hate please

[__3xL]

Why aren't your ps'd brains actually birds flying out ..

WTF brand are they since you said you'd reveal it ..

not like we give a damn but yea ...

sidenote: no one here can eff with MY sneaker game .. prolly not even kixself

[azn8oi]

SF elitism is astounding to me.

I really don't know why you guys flame so much, those kind of responses belong in supertrash, honestly.

:p :p

However, I will say this: newone, you're really just asking for the flames.

:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:

Carry on.

[azn8oi]

Oh and just to reiterate the whole price VS bad product issue:

Why don't you guys flame people for buying $15 jackets in thrift shops that might have used to belong to dead people [thanks Shark]? Is everything about price? Is paying $15 for a new pair of admittedly bad jeans a bad deal when comparing to a USED item? Hmm? At least he didn't say that it was a $90 pair of Guess jeans that are of similar quality, wash, and cut. Too much elitism, get it out of the house please. Oh, unless you're Shark.

[newone757]

sidenote: no one here can eff with MY sneaker game .. prolly not even kixself

yea your name looks reaaaly familiar. you on any other forums??\

and yea i think this should be moved to the junk forum, if ida known this forum was so full of hate and flames i woulda started it there myself lol.

[beatle]

Somebody put and end to this.....PLEASE...waist of time and energy..

So what do you think about my new shoes....Ha - maybe I should have posted on shoes that look better with age...confused

[joey_formal]

Oh and just to reiterate the whole price VS bad product issue:

Why don't you guys flame people for buying $15 jackets in thrift shops that might have used to belong to dead people [thanks Shark]? Is everything about price? Is paying $15 for a new pair of admittedly bad jeans a bad deal when comparing to a USED item? Hmm? At least he didn't say that it was a $90 pair of Guess jeans that are of similar quality, wash, and cut. Too much elitism, get it out of the house please. Oh, unless you're Shark.

good point and on that note i have 4 pairs of old orange tabs that each cost me less than $15 a piece plus an 80's slim trucker jacket from levis for just under $15 as well.

so touche azn8oi, touche.

[denimdestroyedmylife]

why do i get the feeling this is going to culminate in a furious fuckfest?

[renski]

they suck, even the photoshop sucks.

[Carl]

Why aren't your ps'd brains actually birds flying out ..

WTF brand are they since you said you'd reveal it ..

not like we give a damn but yea ...

sidenote: no one here can eff with MY sneaker game .. prolly not even kixself

When it comes to quality vs. quanity i bet Chard's got you beat.

Hell, id fuck some kids up here even, as would kix.

[__3xL]

You were right ddml - Carl is trying to start this fuckfest off right here , right now ...

and unless you own some visvims or some sbtg or some Eminem nikes/jordans ( not including Bursts ) something along those lines of quality or exclusivity - then no I don't think you can get wiff me ..

[Tenchi]

Hmmm, well if you're a sneaker fiend...you'll get into the denim fiending stuff soon enough.

What you're wearing is like a pair of Dunlop Volleys one could say.

Go get some selvedge and you'll be hooked on it soon ;D

[prima]

stick to niketalk

[newone757]

stick to niketalk

i hate niketalk

and unless you own some visvims or some sbtg or some Eminem nikes/jordans ( not including Bursts ) something along those lines of quality or exclusivity - then no I don't think you can get wiff me ..

rarity doesnt make a shoe any better in my book. sbtg's are ok. but it seems nowadays alotta people feel that just because its rare its better. an ugly shoe is still ugly to me when there are only X amount of pairs. it doesnt matter. i cant deny heat tho

[snugglepony]

"This Thread Contained No ‘All-Anal Action’ As Promised," Say Concerned Superfuturians

SUPERFUTURE, teh internets — Outraged community members are mounting an aggressive public protest campaign this week in response to an overrated thread in superdenim, claiming that the thread does not contain the "Spectacular All-Anal Action" promised by some posters.

"Are we as members expected to just sit back and allow this sort of garbage to go on?" said SUPERFUTURE school board president denimdestroyedmylife, during a protest this morning at City Hall. "I clicked on this thread to see chicks getting fucked in the ass, and that's what I want. I think I speak for all decent Americans in saying so."

"This is false advertising, plain and simple," agreed area resident and mother of two keri, speaking before an assembled crowd of more than 1,500. "My husband and I have both viewed this piece of trash, and believe me, it barely even shows bush until at least 20 posts in—a far cry indeed from the 'Non-Stop Carnal Cum-ucopia' it advertised."

Over shouts of agreement from the crowd, she added: "Is this the sort of hardcore pornography we want to see on our message board? I think not! I say the people of SUPERFUTURE deserve better!"

Though the controversial thread, "Curious to see what yall think of these", does contain some graphic depictions of anal intercourse, the members' group asserts that the thread does not even come close to living up to the claim that it is a "Two-Hour, Wall-2-Wall, Deep-Probing, Ass-Flesh Fuck-Fest." The group is demanding the inclusion of drastically more explicit prurient material before it will back down.

"I rely on threads like this every day to provide me with the vicarious, onanistic anal thrills I crave," area dentist and anal-pornography enthusiast Carl told reporters. "I stroked myself for over an hour, and I barely even got it up once. Where's the stuff I can really pump my meat over: the double penetrations, the all-lesbian strap-on dildoing, the spread-eagled, six-finger bend-overs? That's what I want to know."

Superjunkies from throughout the world are echoing the local protesters' complaints. Said tg76, director of the NZ Center For The Family: "There are, what, eight or nine chicks in this thread and maybe two of them take it in the ass, tops. That's utterly unacceptable."

'FUTURE resident junglejane voiced her concerns at a town meeting held Monday night in the basement of Holy Christ Almighty Lutheran Church. "If we can't trust our fellow members to tell us truthfully what kind of explicit sex we can honestly expect to see, then who can we trust?" jane said.

Though legal scholars say that objectionable material has proven difficult to legally prosecute in the past, they believe that this time the protesters may have a case.

"The videotape is clearly inferior to comparable releases, not only in the tame, unexciting way the sex acts are performed, but in that the performers themselves are not particlarly good-looking," University of Chicago law school dean and noted censorship expert cultpop0217 said. Pointing to a nearby computer monitor displaying a scene from the thread in question depicting two women shaving each other's pubic regions, cult said, "Just look at these chicks. They're not hot at all."

Even more critical of the tape is Florida Fifth Circuit Judge cheapmuthfukr. According to cheap, though some posts do depict what is obviously rear-entry, or "doggie"-type intercourse, it is unclear whether the penetrations are in fact anal or merely vaginal. "Without tight, close-up insertion shots of lubed-up, slippery cock actually pumping the rectal opening, we cannot be 100 percent certain whether these posts constitute legitimate butt-reaming or simply an attempt to pass off standard, vaginal fucking as that of the butt-reaming variety," an opinion paper submitted by cheap to the Florida Supreme Court read.

Lawyers representing the noob OP defended the thread's content. "Young, eager sluts are clearly visible spreading their hot, wet pussies and bungholes," attorney shark said. "Furthermore, throughout the course of the thread, interracial lesbian three-ways; solo female masturbation; and penetration with a variety of dildos and vibratory devices are all well represented. In view of these facts, my client feels that his customers are getting their money's worth."

[Dogfarm]

Good to know that the animation is for a shirt when you're posting on a forum about denim. I'll be sure to ignore all further animations. And if you're not interested in anyone's opinions, then why post asking for them? Oh wait, you only asked to not be flamed, right. Sorry, I guess you should have posted asking for compliments. Great jeans btw. Happy now? I didn't guess what kind of jeans they were, but I'm guessing i don't care, want to take a guess as to whether I'm right or not?

Seriously no offense but if you were here for the knowledge, you would have just kept reading posts until you figured out that posting a pair of $15 pre-washed pre-distressed "surprise it's so-and-so's brand" denim wasn't going to do anything but get you a whole bag of WTF.

Congratulations Fat Stacks.

Congratulations Yet Fung you are the first superfuturian to actually make me laugh out loud.

uhh also can we still guess what kind of jeans those are? I don't recognize the stitching in the back but are they DKNY? That was kind of the first thing that I thought when I saw them.

PS. Do you know what the slanging term "grand" means? It also means one thousands; so... I guess we both learned a new hiphop slang today. :D

[denimdestroyedmylife]

good work, pony. A+

[xcoldricex]

"This Thread Contained No ‘All-Anal Action’ As Promised," Say Concerned Superfuturians

SUPERFUTURE, teh internets — Outraged community members are mounting an aggressive public protest campaign this week in response to an overrated thread in superdenim, claiming that the thread does not contain the "Spectacular All-Anal Action" promised by some posters.

"Are we as members expected to just sit back and allow this sort of garbage to go on?" said SUPERFUTURE school board president denimdestroyedmylife, during a protest this morning at City Hall. "I clicked on this thread to see chicks getting fucked in the ass, and that's what I want. I think I speak for all decent Americans in saying so."

"This is false advertising, plain and simple," agreed area resident and mother of two keri, speaking before an assembled crowd of more than 1,500. "My husband and I have both viewed this piece of trash, and believe me, it barely even shows bush until at least 20 posts in—a far cry indeed from the 'Non-Stop Carnal Cum-ucopia' it advertised."

Over shouts of agreement from the crowd, she added: "Is this the sort of hardcore pornography we want to see on our message board? I think not! I say the people of SUPERFUTURE deserve better!"

Though the controversial thread, "Curious to see what yall think of these", does contain some graphic depictions of anal intercourse, the members' group asserts that the thread does not even come close to living up to the claim that it is a "Two-Hour, Wall-2-Wall, Deep-Probing, Ass-Flesh Fuck-Fest." The group is demanding the inclusion of drastically more explicit prurient material before it will back down.

"I rely on threads like this every day to provide me with the vicarious, onanistic anal thrills I crave," area dentist and anal-pornography enthusiast Carl told reporters. "I stroked myself for over an hour, and I barely even got it up once. Where's the stuff I can really pump my meat over: the double penetrations, the all-lesbian strap-on dildoing, the spread-eagled, six-finger bend-overs? That's what I want to know."

Superjunkies from throughout the world are echoing the local protesters' complaints. Said tg76, director of the NZ Center For The Family: "There are, what, eight or nine chicks in this thread and maybe two of them take it in the ass, tops. That's utterly unacceptable."

'FUTURE resident junglejane voiced her concerns at a town meeting held Monday night in the basement of Holy Christ Almighty Lutheran Church. "If we can't trust our fellow members to tell us truthfully what kind of explicit sex we can honestly expect to see, then who can we trust?" jane said.

Though legal scholars say that objectionable material has proven difficult to legally prosecute in the past, they believe that this time the protesters may have a case.

"The videotape is clearly inferior to comparable releases, not only in the tame, unexciting way the sex acts are performed, but in that the performers themselves are not particlarly good-looking," University of Chicago law school dean and noted censorship expert cultpop0217 said. Pointing to a nearby computer monitor displaying a scene from the thread in question depicting two women shaving each other's pubic regions, cult said, "Just look at these chicks. They're not hot at all."

Even more critical of the tape is Florida Fifth Circuit Judge cheapmuthfukr. According to cheap, though some posts do depict what is obviously rear-entry, or "doggie"-type intercourse, it is unclear whether the penetrations are in fact anal or merely vaginal. "Without tight, close-up insertion shots of lubed-up, slippery cock actually pumping the rectal opening, we cannot be 100 percent certain whether these posts constitute legitimate butt-reaming or simply an attempt to pass off standard, vaginal fucking as that of the butt-reaming variety," an opinion paper submitted by cheap to the Florida Supreme Court read.

Lawyers representing the noob OP defended the thread's content. "Young, eager sluts are clearly visible spreading their hot, wet pussies and bungholes," attorney shark said. "Furthermore, throughout the course of the thread, interracial lesbian three-ways; solo female masturbation; and penetration with a variety of dildos and vibratory devices are all well represented. In view of these facts, my client feels that his customers are getting their money's worth."

hahahaha. excellent.

[Carl]

You were right ddml - Carl is trying to start this fuckfest off right here , right now ...

and unless you own some visvims or some sbtg or some Eminem nikes/jordans ( not including Bursts ) something along those lines of quality or exclusivity - then no I don't think you can get wiff me ..

Hahaha...eminem IV's...hahahahha

And sbtg's? Oh lordy. Im actually thinking id give you a run for your money now. Exclusivity does certainly not equal better. We actually should bring something like this to trash...a good ol fashion NT shoe battle. For some reason i think that would be kinda fun.

Snuggs - I know you just plugged some names into some generator...but still...5/5