Undercover Men's F/W09.10 "Earmuff Maniac"

[larssss]

via austere print

what mag is this from? is there more?

[Vampyrvargfesten]

  larssss said:

via austere print

what mag is this from? is there more?

men's non-no august

  walleye said:

More pics. There's one page I couldn't scan because the shot was too dark for my scanner.

[geekbonchic]

  Tyro1 said:

preferred the above jacket in this colour. Were both produced?

I've only seen the full black one, but it is ridiculously nice in person. The knit feels really good and substantial so that you don't feel like you're wearing two different types of garments.

[djrajio]

I ABSOLUTELY LOVE THIS COLLECTION.

The use of PCM as the lining for the blazers and the goretex peaked lapel blazers are fucking awesome.

[Tyro1]

All from NOTE

[034936]

weewwwwww those backpacks are awesome

[riotC]

this collection made undercover top for this season...

[Vampyrvargfesten]

[Desi]

HighSnobiety has the campaign Phantasmagoria up.

[kaws&effect]

Anybody know if it is common for inner tags on their t's to have rough japanese translations on the washing instructions?

Craftsmanship is up to par but the inner labels got me worried about authenticity...

(it says WITE instead of with and DIRACTLY instead of directly...)

heres a couple pics...

anyone know the deal?

[mr fluffernutter]

  Desi said:

HighSnobiety has the campaign Phantasmagoria up.

that's way old... from HUGE magazine i think. was a good editorial though.

but highsnobriety got they numbers mixed up (numbers is hard)... that's the fw 08 collection.

[Desi]

  diamonds said:

that's way old... from HUGE magazine i think. was a good editorial though.

but highsnobriety got they numbers mixed up (numbers is hard)... that's the fw 08 collection.

aw shit. knew i didn't recognize some of the outerwear!

[poof]

  kaws&effect said:

Anybody know if it is common for inner tags on their t's to have rough japanese translations on the washing instructions?

Craftsmanship is up to par but the inner labels got me worried about authenticity...

(it says WITE instead of with and DIRACTLY instead of directly...)

heres a couple pics...

anyone know the deal?

Its normal man. Labels like _7 n several others has similar errors as well.

I think that as long as there's watermark/red stamp on the wash tags, it should be authentic.

[kaws&effect]

  poof said:

Its normal man. Labels like _7 n several others has similar errors as well.

I think that as long as there's watermark/red stamp on the wash tags, it should be authentic.

great, thank you sir.