Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

paging all those fond of sesquipedalian verbiage!

bonus points if you don't know what you are saying!

points will be deducted for propagating colonialistic dageurrotypes, prosthelitizing erroneous falsehoods of the pernicious persuasion, and manumitting masturbatory milquetoastian malapropisms!

proceed, gentlemen!

Posted
zomg

tots

irl

imho

jklalz

lulz, lolz, lolzors and its variants

kbye

ttyl

gtfo

stfu

o rly?

ya rly

and general lol-speak

you must be one of those college drop-crotch.

robocop dem jawns

you are in violation of categorical imperative numero uno 3xl.

Posted

canada's sartorial canon is becoming quixotic mostly due to the appropriation of american pop ideologies, as exemplified by robert geller's hegemonic domination of northern fashion types.

(LOL RIGHT?)

Posted

you must admit, though, that his approach is fairly perfunctory, despite the overall photochromic feel of his shows. Perhaps the odious nature is a provocation of the typically vivid tones employed in s/s shows?

Posted

Au contraire, in light of the recent mithraic revivalism of post-misogynistic carpet munching, many luminaries insist that the phallic formulation of cogitative coitus interruptus does not redoubt, or renege upon, the trompe l'oeil tour de force of the soul.

Posted

On the surface, Superfuture itself seems to me to offer a parallel view of society itself; those with jawns are praised, and those without are marginalized. This is the typical belonging-exclusion dichotomy that we see mirrored in the everyday. But of course real life isn't so simple--the view Superfuture offers is parallax, not parallel. Superfuture, while appearing to be a straightforward representation of society, offers not a parallel analogy but instead a metonymic one, one in which overpriced trinkets and pseudodermal clothing are associated with status, both social and economic, intelligence, and, surprisingly, taste. The reality of the situation is that there are a few who possess seemingly precognitive powers with regard to adapting next-level trends, but sadly, the majority are content to indulge in an onanistic celebration of shibboleth brands and designers. The obverse to this, of course, is that some brands and designers are Gileadites and some are Ephraimites, so to speak. All of this borders on the foolhardy; at the end of the day, what looks good looks good, regardless of the WAYWT caucus. The world that Superfuture evinces is not real life; it does not asymptote toward real life; it doesn't even approximate real life. It is a Bizarro world, a niche, in which many of the posters, in a desperate attempt to win "reputation" and the acceptance of their compeers, are willing to turn their life into a Potemkin village; what is revealed in the lens of the camera, in the series of self-laudatory anecdotes, one may safely wager, oftentimes lacks the veracity of the actual. Some may use their posting history to act as a (in some cases, therapeutic) sort of bildungsroman, but the majority, in a perhaps desperate attempt to placate whatever insecuriities they may already otherwise internalized, offer narratives that have clearly been embellished or, in some cases, falsified. Given the strides made in the technological manipulation of representation, even a photograph or a series of photographs can no longer serve as evidence of anything. Endless exegeses don't matter; endless photostreams don't matter; in the end, we find ourselves reliving the Copernican revolution all over again, in which our entire world, our entire universe is being decentered, and we come to the realization that only existence matters. But Superfuture itself is not a bad thing; as long as one is cognizant of the fact that Superfuture is Superfuture and nothing more than that, then, and only then I would argue, can one fully partake in the Superfuture experience.

Posted
the sheer tenacity of the plethora of curmudgeons in said thread have denigrated its former gulliverian status to mere lillipution proportions...

tsk tsk: lilliputian is the correct spelling

but you used milquetoast, which is awesome, so no points deducted

oh and one of the most misused and overused terms from college? Cartesian

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...