Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

it's weird that one night a ref goes epileptic and dishes out 5 techs in like ten seconds and the next blake griffin is allowed to blatantly stare people down. i mean the latter shouldn't be a technical but according to the stupid rules it is

Posted

The knicks\blazers game the other night. Larmarcus Aldridge knocks Felton down, and then screams at the ref with his hands up, no Tech.

Posted

Yeah but the refs ruined that games on both ends... after Amar'e picked up his first T he continually kept yelling "AND ONE!" every time he touched the ball and he did all sorts of "inappropriate" air punching, macho skipping/hopping, etc. that easily could've been T material if they didn't want to get toss him...

D'antoni and Macmillan were both out past half court multiple times, blah blah blah...

short version: the T rules are junk, and the refs' enforcement of them is even worse.

related note: was it someone in here who posted that article about the NBA adopting soccer-esque advantage rules on fouls? I forget what blog it was on, it was interesting, since the point was that it's essentially what refs do already when they blow a late whistle when there's contact and then the shot doesn't go down.

edit: found it.

imo the best outcome of revising the rule would be that intentional fouls at the ends of games wouldn't be enough to stop the clock unless they are actually effecting the ball handler, which would mostly do away with games under 10 points coming down to a minute and a half long free throw shootout.

Posted

NBA should just go back to 80s/90s rules. Allow hand checking and flagrants are just good hard fouls. When a defender jumps back to avoid a ballhandler who is trying to initiate contact it shouldnt be a foul.

Posted

agreed.

though I think "charge vs. block" is one of the most frequently miscalled types of fouls. The rule in itself isn't even the problem, it's that it's genuinely hard to tell sometimes, especially at full speed.

It seems like at least half the time a charge is called the replay shows that the defender had indeed set his feet, but only after the offensive player was already airborne.

What's a ref supposed to do though? Without genuinely being able to see both at once, which is impossible, the best they can hope to do is focus on one and catch the other out of the corner of their eye...

Posted
though I think "charge vs. block" is one of the most frequently miscalled types of fouls....

Last night in the Spurs/Nugs game the refs took it to a whole new level. Something I've never seen.

They called a charge and block at the same time.

huh? really? how can there be both?

Posted
oneHD in australia have gone from showing about 5-6 games a week to 2. its always usually a heat or lakers game, too. fuck this. :(

What about this bloody "Andrew Bogut Presents the NBA" bullshit? Someone should tell One that the Bucks suck to watch.

Posted

The league gets more and more star-diculous each year. my hat is off to the Russian for taking back control. If David Stern wants all the talent on 4-6 big market teams...well, good luck with that business model.

Posted
If David Stern wants all the talent on 4-6 big market teams...well, good luck with that business model.

It worked in the 80s and 90s when there were fewer teams. Half the 1-8 seeds on both conferences arent big market teams.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...