The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones

[16steps]

you sure as hell make a fuckton of assumptions without actually knowing me. Humorous to an extent. I dont have to justify my preference in music, much less anything, to you. You can assess my tastes anyway that you want to, and if it makes you feel better, you can think you're right.

You come across exactly as the pretentious asshole you look like in your pics. Like i said before, ROBIDOUCHE FO SHO

You revel in music that universally accessible and overrated, partaking of the same mono-culture that media corporations make billions off every year.

my taste in music isnt good because the artists i like are accessible? How does obscurity make music better? Thats a rhetorical question, btw. I really dont want to read another longwinded response from you where you try to portray yourself as cultured. Thanks

[gramps]

Actually you are an embarrassment of an old man for not possessing any actual wisdom, any secret knowledge that youngsters like us cant easily access thanks to wikipedia.

Because the those truly attuned to the avant garde prefer Pitchfork. Pfft.

[gramps]

Anyway, before this gets totally gay and everyone start talking about atonal synth jams:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMiGT2-jmUQ

[malaesthetique]

Because the those truly attuned to the avant garde prefer Pitchfork. Pfft.

I hate pitchfork even more than Zubin, whom I actually only pity.

[scitsilyts]

i dont have time to read through 11 pages of this shit...but why do people constantly compare the beatles and the stones??? the only thing that ties them together is their age and their popularity.

[malaesthetique]

Only a tool like you can make liking the Beatles a trait of plebes.

Sorry, I didn't realize this was a forum for plebes. you guys are sooooo styleforum.

[Francis Xavier]

Sorry, but I could not stay away from this thread.

I say that we keep this thread as pretentious and hostile as possible. Sometimes you just have to force people to learn.

fuck that. bob dylan and the band in 1966 rapes every band past and present

Nnnnnnnnnnnnnnmmmmmmuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhyyyyyyyyyyya'gay.

Honestly though, Soft Machine, Silver Apples, and SUICIDE.

Phonies. Know-nothings. Exhibitionists. Shock-of-the-new acts with nothing to say and in the worst ways. I do like some Soft Machine, though. Not that they have anything to do with that which followed. You might like The Muffins. Manna/Mirage is a good cut.

For someone your age you really ought to be more interesting instead of such a mediocre douche. You revel in music that universally accessible and overrated, partaking of the same mono-culture that media corporations make billions off every year. Its like your actually striving (but failing) to be the industry's ideal consumer, an expert in facile boring crap that is useless save as a stepping stone. In reality though you have no intuitive navigatory sense of the post-modern cultural landscape. Like a drug addict you have learned nothing from your indulgences--just another castrated consumer. What is even worse is that you think you actually deserve praise and respect for your antics, repeating the same trite analyses of Jimmy Hendrix and the Beatles music that everyone has heard a million times before. We'll, you are a good boy now aren't you!

Actually you are an embarrassment of an old man for not possessing any actual wisdom, any secret knowledge that youngsters like us cant easily access thanks to wikipedia. You still listen to the Smiths and the Cure?(referencing a different post here) What, are you that much of a late bloomer that you've only just discovered them during your midlife crisis, or are you simply a neanderthal that refuses to evolve? For most people I know this is High School or College music at best. If after a couple years of heavy rotation these guys continue to blow your mind then you truly are a nitwit.

Suicide and Silver Apples are not clever. I mean, I like you, but c'mon man. They're just as cheap as the other idiots you've mentioned above. There's a whole world of non-academic electronic composition and improv that sends them back to prance around the kiddie table where they belong. Suicide more than Silver Apples. I'll at least give them a break.

Anyway, before this gets totally gay and everyone start talking about atonal synth jams

Most synth jams are gay because of lack of talent, ambition, knowledge of synthesis paired with expressive talent and creativity, or compatable partners. Not to mention that a fascination with the shock schlock of the new never ages well. This is why only one synth jam group ever mattered, and it's not early TD...

rfylOUxm5IA

Guess which [back of the] head is me here:

BQzoDEn-GpU

We were supposed to get a music swap thing going down at some point. That could be fun. Does anybody use SOUL SEEK!?

[jeepster]

Hey You Guyz Like Them?

No Seriously

them

Check It Out.

[Francis Xavier]

I would love for this thread to work out.

[JackPhotography]

you save on viagra cause hendrix gives you a boner? great. too bad you all you've got is saw dust in your nuts. all i'm saying is that there are alot of older individuals (unlike your obsolete dinosaur self) who've got something to say thats actually worth a shit. the reason why your mummy -ass is actually trying to have a debate with the younger generation, is probably because none of your age-bracket peers pay the slightest attention 2 you. hated on by old farts and by young bucks.

everything you've said in this thread is based on popular opinion. nevermind the fact that you sucked dick in the 60s/70s whatever. you've got really nothing to say that hasn't been heard or said better before.

lol.

10char