Jump to content

Catherine Servel Photography


onemancult

Recommended Posts

I wish I could put together my words on how I feel about these photos as well as OMC, but I guess all I can say is that I'm fond of these photos. They have some bit of glamour and sex in them but not in such a misogynist way that much fashion photography does. The way the model exists as a part of a photograph is pleasing, somewhat whimsical and very alluring, to say the least.

agreed. being the bra-burning feminist type, i'd prefer the uninteresting, overly desaturated stuff like this to the rigor mortis from overly didactic male photographers.

for the record i've always thought bourdin was borderline offensive, even though they are visually very interesting. oh, a male fashion photographer who is being tongue in cheek and politicized about how objectified women are in this world! (stabs self in chest)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

agreed. being the bra-burning feminist type, i'd prefer the uninteresting, overly desaturated stuff like this to the rigor mortis from overly didactic male photographers.

for the record i've always thought bourdin was borderline offensive, even though they are visually very interesting. oh, a male fashion photographer who is being tongue in cheek and politicized about how objectified women are in this world! (stabs self in chest)

Bourdin had misogynistic issues since, I believe, his parents had marital difficulties and he was almost abandoned by his mother. He also had a particular relationship with his wives; one of them hanged herself.

He was a man driven by obsession which is what makes for a certain greatness.

He also made short films:

http://showstudio.com/projects/guy/guy_movies.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The so-called "point & shoot esthetic" was pushed into acceptance by William Eggleston's exhibit mounted by John Szarkowksi in the '70s.

That was a really controversial exhibition since color photography was considered an inferior, disposable format and relegated to the advertising industry-- only B&W was acceptable at that time.

However, this point & shoot look has been bastardized by yet again, pretentious types armed with a Polaroid or Lomo who thinks anything vaguely contrasty is instant 'art'. I suppose that's what comes out of a Post-Modernist enviroment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The so-called "point & shoot esthetic" was pushed into acceptance by William Eggleston's exhibit mounted by John Szarkowksi in the '70s.

That was a really controversial exhibition since color photography was considered an inferior, disposable format and relegated to the advertising industry-- only B&W was acceptable at that time.

However, this point & shoot look has been bastardized by yet again, pretentious types armed with a Polaroid or Lomo who thinks anything vaguely contrasty is instant 'art'. I suppose that's what comes out of a Post-Modernist enviroment.

Egglestons stuff captured surburban life in the 70s. It at least has historic value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

However, this point & shoot look has been bastardized by yet again, pretentious types armed with a Polaroid or Lomo who thinks anything vaguely contrasty is instant 'art'. I suppose that's what comes out of a Post-Modernist enviroment.

i really hate the lomo look cross process bullshit for the most part

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...