Any thoughts on these jeans...

[sgtbones]

Seller has 100% positive and redline selvedge is visible but the color seems a bit odd. What do the experts say?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7773130482&rd=1&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&rd=1

[red]

if anything is odd about those jeans, its the inside of them. i havent seen weaving that neat on selvedge denim before. now that looks odd.

[red]

well now that ive taken a second look, it looks way too horizontal. and i have to agree that stonewashed denim is a bit odd.

[cheapmuthafukr]

the length is off, and legs should be more twisted if they are that light. if its a tagged 30, the length should be around 27 not 29. the black bartack is alot darker than the ones that im wearing right now too.

fake if you ask me.

shit...

Edited by cheapmuthafukr on Jun 14, 2006 at 08:51 AM

[red]

ooh. good eye.

[cheapmuthafukr]

here are pics of real redlines. judge for yourself.

notice the seams have twisted 90 degrees

back pocket. bartacks are not as prominent

shit...

[mopar_jj]

Sweet Redlines, what size are these ? #on button? are these 501-0117 on the rear patch?

details details!! pls

tks

mjj

[cheapmuthafukr]

top button is 524

shit...

[mopar_jj]

sweet, that 0117 indigo is such an awsome color, not washed out, almost look new! and long length - tripple score!