Broark

I’m with you on vests, just a line that I can’t seem to cross. So I’ll be passing as well. And you know if I really wanted to try a vest I probably would’ve already gotten several from FW.

Interesting, mine still seem to have a bit of starch to them. But the denim is very soft no question.

@beautiful_FrEaK how did you wash your pair? And how many washes so far? I've only done the initial wash via OA's suggested process (warm bath soak, cold gentle wash) and I'm finding the denim to be a little rigid still after a couple of months. Also, it looks like OA will be releasing the vest that they had for sale two Inspirations ago, this time in a 10 oz. denim inspired by Amoskeag Mills (produced by Collect). I think a few people here might have the Cone version, @CSL and anyone else? Interested in your thoughts on it after some time as well as any pictures if it's showing wear. Never been a vest guy, but seeing them wear it it looks pretty cool and functional.

@AlientoyWorkmachine another user on here that I chat with a lot has been talking up Michigan, seems like a nice spot. Winters would be a big change but honestly with how brutal the last few summers have been down here it sounds like a nice change of pace. Also have some family moving back to the DC area soon so that's another option. I just want anywhere with four actual, distinguishable seasons!

The top is stitched down, there's a pen holder on the left hand side and there's a cutout in the middle where you can access it. Stole this photo from Brogue:

@tooth I missed it the first time around back in 2021, and honestly it worked out for the best. The updated model is a bit looser fitting and has the two way zipper which is a nice touch.

Main difference is the denim, the '42 uses the same denim as the S601xx WWII jacket. But the buttons are also different as is the stitching color. And the cinch is coated black / dark silver as opposed to polished silver. And the tab is a bit faded, a bit more washed out pink. Not sure about the pocket specs from a size perspective.

@mstax I'll take some measurements for you soon, plan is to wash it once I get the jeans in. Raw it feels similar to other type I jackets I have from FW, however I don't own the '47 version. For reference I have the '22, '33 and '45 all in size 46.

Honestly we just need to move somewhere more temperate.

As promised, some recent deliveries from Mr. Seiichiro. I also got a handful of tees, didn't photograph those. Won't be able to wear these for a few months but that's okay. 506xx 1942. Blythestone flannel. Lot 100 Ironalls jacket. Deck Worker jacket. S-8 jacket. M-1951 field jacket.

@tooth I went with my usual FW size, I believe the cut is somewhat similar to the '37s so I'm expecting them to be a little loose up top. Will post measurements once they arrive.

Really neat how you can see where you tuck them in!

I wanted to try the '42 jeans out because they're a bit unique, no one else is really making repros of this model that was made for a short period of time. I also felt like I washed my WWII pair too often, so I want to get a little more contrast this time around with the same denim to see how it fairs. @mstax the 601xx '51 jeans / 507xx are perennial releases as far as I know, so you should be able to get that tux setup more readily than the seasonal releases. No experience with boiling jeans that hot, but I'd avoid it due to the prospect of possibly ruining the patch. I've always found that a hot wash with normal agitation from the washing machine gets the most shrink, at least with our washer setup. Temperature is only one factor in shrinkage, agitation is equally as important in my experience.

Agreed, the toys weren’t really my thing but I can appreciate the thought and care that went into developing them. @MJF9 same situation as Doc, mine should be here soon-ish. I did receive the jacket, I plan on taking some photos of it this weekend (along with a bunch of other things). Been a bit hectic lately since I recently started my new job.

Cool video here made by Nest Store from Korea, interviewing a few faces behind Freewheelers. Not sure how many parts there will be, but I personally really enjoyed watching this one, and I appreciate that they embedded English subtitles.

I think it’s a bit of over-saturation in the market, it seems like there are so many people offering such a similar product that it’s just not as unique as it once was. I appreciate the SC ones after seeing them in person and seeing side by side photos of the originals compared to the reproduction. It’s a testament to their ability to train their production team to really hone in on the details. But everyone just letting some runoff extend off their stitches and calling it “wonky” seems a bit lazy and low effort. All in all I agree with @l13902733261, I’ll take the FW approach to war era denim over most others, but y’all already knew that.

Yes that’s correct. Impressive nonetheless in my opinion.

Having seen a few different pairs in person (speaking on the 43 tux, can’t comment on the 46): it’s actually very impressive how nearly identical the wonky, irregular stitching is across each item. Down to the little flecks of weft sticking out. They did a great job of making these as close to their original vintage pieces as possible.

Looks like they included some extra thread in case you need to repair it yourself down the line.

Which one is which?

For anyone looking for an OA type II, there's one in size 38 on Yahoo Auctions right now. https://page.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/v1136887602

Yup those are '47s, they have the domed rivets on the back pockets.

@AnOldFolkSong I'm gonna guess 1947s, do you have photos of the back pocket rivets?

I had talked myself out of getting these and then I tried a pair on.

My '42 506xx should be here Friday, I'll get some photos of it up as well as my other recent deliveries soon.