Jump to content

Broark

supermod
  • Posts

    6544
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    132

Everything posted by Broark

  1. Main difference is the denim, the '42 uses the same denim as the S601xx WWII jacket. But the buttons are also different as is the stitching color. And the cinch is coated black / dark silver as opposed to polished silver. And the tab is a bit faded, a bit more washed out pink. Not sure about the pocket specs from a size perspective.
  2. @mstax I'll take some measurements for you soon, plan is to wash it once I get the jeans in. Raw it feels similar to other type I jackets I have from FW, however I don't own the '47 version. For reference I have the '22, '33 and '45 all in size 46.
  3. Honestly we just need to move somewhere more temperate.
  4. As promised, some recent deliveries from Mr. Seiichiro. I also got a handful of tees, didn't photograph those. Won't be able to wear these for a few months but that's okay. 506xx 1942. Blythestone flannel. Lot 100 Ironalls jacket. Deck Worker jacket. S-8 jacket. M-1951 field jacket.
  5. @tooth I went with my usual FW size, I believe the cut is somewhat similar to the '37s so I'm expecting them to be a little loose up top. Will post measurements once they arrive.
  6. Really neat how you can see where you tuck them in!
  7. I wanted to try the '42 jeans out because they're a bit unique, no one else is really making repros of this model that was made for a short period of time. I also felt like I washed my WWII pair too often, so I want to get a little more contrast this time around with the same denim to see how it fairs. @mstax the 601xx '51 jeans / 507xx are perennial releases as far as I know, so you should be able to get that tux setup more readily than the seasonal releases. No experience with boiling jeans that hot, but I'd avoid it due to the prospect of possibly ruining the patch. I've always found that a hot wash with normal agitation from the washing machine gets the most shrink, at least with our washer setup. Temperature is only one factor in shrinkage, agitation is equally as important in my experience.
  8. Agreed, the toys weren’t really my thing but I can appreciate the thought and care that went into developing them. @MJF9 same situation as Doc, mine should be here soon-ish. I did receive the jacket, I plan on taking some photos of it this weekend (along with a bunch of other things). Been a bit hectic lately since I recently started my new job.
  9. Cool video here made by Nest Store from Korea, interviewing a few faces behind Freewheelers. Not sure how many parts there will be, but I personally really enjoyed watching this one, and I appreciate that they embedded English subtitles.
  10. I think it’s a bit of over-saturation in the market, it seems like there are so many people offering such a similar product that it’s just not as unique as it once was. I appreciate the SC ones after seeing them in person and seeing side by side photos of the originals compared to the reproduction. It’s a testament to their ability to train their production team to really hone in on the details. But everyone just letting some runoff extend off their stitches and calling it “wonky” seems a bit lazy and low effort. All in all I agree with @l13902733261, I’ll take the FW approach to war era denim over most others, but y’all already knew that.
  11. Yes that’s correct. Impressive nonetheless in my opinion.
  12. Having seen a few different pairs in person (speaking on the 43 tux, can’t comment on the 46): it’s actually very impressive how nearly identical the wonky, irregular stitching is across each item. Down to the little flecks of weft sticking out. They did a great job of making these as close to their original vintage pieces as possible.
  13. Looks like they included some extra thread in case you need to repair it yourself down the line.
  14. For anyone looking for an OA type II, there's one in size 38 on Yahoo Auctions right now. https://page.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/v1136887602
  15. Yup those are '47s, they have the domed rivets on the back pockets.
  16. @AnOldFolkSong I'm gonna guess 1947s, do you have photos of the back pocket rivets?
  17. I had talked myself out of getting these and then I tried a pair on.
  18. My '42 506xx should be here Friday, I'll get some photos of it up as well as my other recent deliveries soon.
  19. The vests are intriguing, never really been a vest guy but seeing them wear them they look cool. A 507xx would be awesome.
  20. I've been eyeing the new bandana but I've held off due to the larger size. I usually carry one of the Two Ears ones around in a back pocket during the summer to wipe away sweat. Curious what jeans they had available for sale this past weekend @JohnM / @julian-wolf?
  21. @olmecasteve I don’t typically go this route, I’ve grown to like the sharp rivets. And they tend to dull a little over time, not as much as having them machined down but more subtly. I’ve got quite a few bits headed my way from Seiichro, should post some photos here in the next couple days.
  22. Couple of comparison shots of the 03s worn for a bit and the new 01s which have not been washed / worn yet. The 01s use the same denim but the "A-grade" variant, so a little less irregular (not that the denim used on the 03s is very irregular to start with). The 01s are on the left, the 03s are on the right.
  23. @julian-wolf They’ll be at the Oakland location, Sunday the 28th from 11 to 5. Let us know if you end up swinging by and getting anything!
  24. No I didn't go to the event, Hudson Hill was helping them sell some pairs via Instagram. Not sure if they're all accounted for or not. Sounds like they'll have some jeans for sale at S&S this upcoming weekend. Hudson Hill told me they had these 01s and some 03s Interested to see what's available at S&S this weekend if anyone makes it out there!
×
×
  • Create New...