beautiful_FrEaK

I really like the Hayashi-san/Ivy style but yeah, somehow those look a bit off.

Looking good! I really should start wearing the 714 as my next pair.

So, now after 2 weeks of wear I have to say I really love the SC1946 model. The fit is just right for me and the denim is awesome . The right texture and irregularities for my taste without feeling over-engineered. First it felt/looked very similar to the 1947 denim but through wearing the denim evolved a bit. I have ordered the 1943 as well but they have to wait. Still, the 42k price tag is steep and I would have preferred 32k But seeing how quickly they all sold, SugarCane did the right thing

All different

The rebuilt homepage is back online since a few weeks. https://rebuilt.jp/

@Thor it is very unusualy to just state the back rise. Usually, if you can find a rise to be listed, it's the front rise. That said 42 cm = 16.5" sounds strange for a pair of jeans. Even for the 2001 in a W42. Do you have a link to that listing?

and now it's your turn @Dr_Heech! Happy birthday young man

Thanks for the reminder. Happy birthday @Maynard Friedman !

The better question would be, who doesn't? 😅 https://fullcount-online.com/shops.html

These flannel pocket bags look very familiar...

Ok, now a serious answer. I really think they cater to a different audience. All in all the Freewheelers are probably the better jeans. Cleaner construction, high quality materials, better pattern, more unique denim. The CSF really focus on the "authenticity" even if this means deliberately including failures. But (as you think as well @Dr_Heech ) using the period correct sewing machines and using the same sewing techniques is something you won't find on other jeans on this level. Price-wise the FW clearly win as you get a lot for your money and you don't pay a dick But in the end, the best jeans is the one that fits you best and which you want to put on each day and that's why I said SC 1946

You would need to take my wife then as well 😅

Denime Type2 - Arket sweater - Sugarcane 1946 - Vans

Dunimuuu!

@DC2020 that's a great fit!

^ Sugarcane 1946

Thanks! Nope, nearly no twist on my pair

@yung_flynn Usually you see the hidden selvedge in the coin pocket on pairs up to the 60s. Sometimes with peek-a-boo selvedge. But that's surely not a hard rule as you can see with your Warehouse. My Lb40s also don't have the selvedge in the coin pocket. I am pretty sure not all Levi's were the same as well.

And here are my fit pics. Size 34 (one-wash)

Yep, they already have the 1946 listed for restock on their homepage in March

My pair has finally arrived. Size 34x33 One-wash Waist: 34" Front rise: 12.5" Back rise: 16.375" Thighs: 13" Knee: 9.5" Leg opening: 8.8" Inseam: 33"

@JMS what are the shoulder measurements of the SugarCane 1937 Type 1? I fear a size 40 will be too small for me but you never know.

BTW, the 1946 model is already planned for a restock in March. In case anybody missed out.

@tooth thanks for the measurements! Where do you measure the thighs though? 12" sounds tiny for a W33 so I don't think it's at the crotch? @MJF9 The back rise really sounds rather small but that's nice for me (I hope). Will find out tomorrow.

Will have to wait until at least Saturday. The German counterpart of EMS is really not so good