Jared_Lee

Where's @Megatron1505? We miss you!

Yeah, I keep popping onto Yahoo auctions Japan and looking at the lightly worn pairs. I basically need a 35 in the old 2001 No.1. I haven't pulled the trigger yet though because I own a pair of the 2001s in No.2 denim. I think I should fill out the original Osaka 5 rotation with some SD101s and Denime before a second pair of 2001s.

Ok, finally got it sorted on the url upload. Sufu just doesn't like the "share" link that Google creates. But if I copy that link, paste in the browser, copy the new url that populates and then use that url, Sufu accepts the image upload. I've gotten a couple entry level vintage watches recently and this 1961 Hamilton A-600 Automatic is my absolute favorite. I was watching "Queer" and yes, noticed the suits and slacks, but more so noticed the watches. That era had a little bubble to the crystal that I love. So I started hunting through 50s and 60s watches until I came across this one. It was originally gaining four minutes a day. I got it serviced and now it's losing one minute per day. Not bad for an 64 year old watch picked up on the cheap from eBay. WoM jeans visible beneath.

1961 Hamilton A-600 Automatic

@beautiful_FrEaK, 2.86 mb

Just installed and tried with Microsoft Edge and got the exact same results.

@ATWM, they're definitely jpegs. Just double checked. I take photos on a Pixel 6a. I've never had trouble before these past few weeks. @CSL, I don't use any web privacy stuff (though I know I should). I also thought perhaps it was a browser setting issue, but it's happening on both my computer and phone. I guess I could try a non-Google browser

So my workaround to get the last image to post was to create a link in my Google photos and use the web link upload rather than the direct upload. Now that's giving me a red error as well. At this point, I am no longer able to upload any photos at all to the forum either from my phone or from my computer. That's going to make continuing my updates and participation difficult. Bizarre that this is only happening to me, but it's not isolated to just my computer or just my phone.

@Cold Summer, that's a pretty accurate summary as my memory serves. I also respect that they have stayed with what they always were. I prefer a brand that weathers the storm of falling out of trend and stays true to its intention. If you can survive, the trend will always swing back around.

At the end of the day, it's about style. These jeans have a very deliberate style and if it isn't what you're looking for, it isn't gonna work. Many jeans intentionally try to be completely non-descript (WH1001, SD101, SC47, etc.) and that makes them blend easily into simple, generic outfits (not meat as a pejorative, but perhaps a little shade thrown). The 0105 is aggressively anti-fit and requires you to lean into that for it to work. In the 13.7, you may be able to finesse the sizing to avoid that, but on the SS it just is what it is. I love them both and I have the SS tux. Every time I wash my WoM and I put on my SS pair, I miss it. The big ol' saggy butt and easy fit feels so good and is easy for me to work into a tucked shirt, lower on the waist paired with loafers easy day outfit. I also wore my 13.7s last week while doing some motorcycle maintenance. Damn, still my all time favorite pair of jeans. Hands down.

ngl, the new Flat Head 3005 measurements look great

Odd, I see your photo @UkeNo, but I'm still getting the same error both on my laptop and on my phone.

I've been trying to upload another photo of the indigo evo on these jeans, but I keep getting an "Error Code: -200." Not sure if anyone else on the forum is having this problem. I've tried from both my phone and my laptop and same error each time

I give it a coat of Obenauf's before each wash. Not sure if the beeswax has anything to with preserving the pigment.