Jump to content

andyrcii

member
  • Posts

    137
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by andyrcii

  1. I decided to keep the 1944's. they reminded me of Kurt Cobains jeans from MTV Live and Loud, ones he called his "rap jeans". I paired them with this Lee 101 Rider jacket.

    I'll never wear them much until my other jeans are more worn in, but they do have a nice "retro" fade, much softer and machine washed but pretty good. wallet fade, and if you look carefully there are actually some knee creases. early ish LVC so they aren't accurate as later 1944 recreations. the buttons aren't right, and the red tab though single sided, has an (R) on it. 

    c9a6961366477911.jpg bb14b81366477915.jpg 937dc31366477918.jpg 7bf9041366477919.jpg 

  2. Of course there were photos.. I thought they were a genuine fade, not pre faded. Though many bits are genuine fades like the pocket rivet fades. Maybe they were “new rinse” originally, who knows. My point is, fake fades usually don’t look good, and I usually spot them.

  3. a893871366387687.jpg 1d84c81366387769.jpg 9b21301366387876.jpg 3181d91366387948.jpg 479f6e1366388042.jpg 5932fd1366388091.jpg 13af411366388148.jpg dc61361366388242.jpg 

    Check out these 1944 555s I got..  I made the mistake of thinking they were originally raw and that the 32W 34L after quite a lot of washing would be a good fit for me. 
    they have to be a prewash though because they are BAGGY.. you can still see the screen printed arcs on the edges a bit. Patch gone, and no dark blue underneath.. another possible tell tale that these were sanforised. 
     

    Not sure what I will do with them, maybe take them in, keep them as they are, maybe for denim for any future patching requirements. The crotch could use some attention, it has previously been fixed.. I don’t know if the baggy grunge look is growing on me maybe..

  4. 10b2841365417417.jpg 2205491365417455.jpg a0456d1365417518.jpg c1434b1365417567.jpg 

    Cone denim Levis 1890s 501; one year ago and today. 
     

    90 days wear and 158 days wear respectively.. one very light bathtub wash (with hardly any Mr Black denim wash) at 133 days wear, I wasn’t planning to wash them so soon but they were so dirty with all the dirt and ash i engrained into them, wiped oil on the legs as well as old candle wax. I only treated these “miner jeans” this harshly..

  5. adcc951357242645.jpg 9c2d5a1357242657.jpg 5ac5a61357242675.jpg 72bfdc1357242697.jpg 65001d1357242708.jpg 

    just got this 1950s Space Shirt, its made of very light material, and quite loose like a Hawaiian shirt. Then I noticed the tag was missing a letter. The seller was from portugal, where these are made. 
    if its a fake, the quality is second to none and I am keeping it. 

  6. Ah yeah, missed that. 
    I don’t think I will be keeping them as they are too tight and I don’t really like the fit. 
     

    I paid £95 + £9 postage and am currently trying to decide whether I should return them or sell them on.

  7. On 6/12/2020 at 10:05 PM, Maynard Friedman said:

    I have to say that the ‘55s are a great cut for me, the perfect amount of rise, thigh room and taper, I wish I’d started wearing them earlier. I really like the denim, it’s light enough for the usual summer temperatures in London (when it’s too hot I’m in shorts anyway) but not as flimsy as say, the lighter ‘37 denim, so substantial enough for winter wear too. I’ll post some photos when there’s progress worth showing, I’m currently only a few weeks in.

    I’m glad I have a spare pair too, 2009 vintage!

    The 55 have become my favourite too. I wish I had bought these first.. they are so roomy, and bold. everything about them is so wholesome and of the 50's period.  I look at everyone wearing tight tapered jeans and feel sorry for them. 

    funny thing is, my first pair of jeans I owned , circa 1989- had the same kind of boxy cut to them. and big cuffs so I could grow into them. 

    f1c2631347005611.jpg fe51271347005612.jpg 

  8. ccb8c21346451793.jpg 707b9e1346451801.jpg 

    found one of these Rocket City bay meadows sweaters from SS19 collection. I was sorely tempted with this when it came out, I mean come on it has my initials ARC on the front. But £150 I think they were asking, I thought was a little much.

  9. I know what you mean. I ended up removing most of it. This involved an iron and kitchen roll. Not because it looked like cum, just because it didn’t look how I wanted it to in the video with the calico jeans, and it has those marks which look like white paint, its miners wax. But the wax they used isn’t really anything like regular candle wax.

     

  10. Ha ha ha. Well Now that you mention it, there is this old victorian farmers field near me, all grass and overgrowth now, but recently a digger went through part of the field, and it’s unearthed a lot of cool stuff, like Victorian bottles, marbles, coal or Antracite, pottery... I’ve been stuffing the pockets of these jeans with lumps of black coal. 
     

    and I never put my phone in the front pockets. These jeans are very sublte faders, you only really notice the fading when you look back to when they were new :

    247a981346368635.jpg 

     

  11. 9d71391346366020.jpg fc7d551346366178.jpg 0fab5f1346366360.jpg 5083981346366493.jpg a05c651346366516.jpg 

     

    better pictures as the sun has come out.

    As my Calico miner jeans, I have tried to make them more authentic by deliberately sitting on nice patches of dust/dirt when out walking. I do the gardening in them, I’ve rubbed oil on them.. (not too much) and even a little candle wax to try and get that miners candle staining on them. 

×
×
  • Create New...