silencejoe

On 11/20/2020 at 4:28 PM, silencejoe said:

Umm the yahoo action one looks like 46s but not same as the contest pair.

The 47s Looks like this one

https://www.google.com/amp/s/gamp.ameblo.jp/atoz21/entry-10783451887.html

 

and I got the contest pair and 54 zip one

Also the color on the contest 46s looks like warehouse deadstock blue, i will try to compare it when i got the warehouse deadstock blue

I just got the dead stock blue jacket, looks like the color on the contest pair are much more darker than the dead stock blue jacket

sorry for my poor phone picture 

 

top

left devis contest 46s

right dead stock blue non wash

Bottom

left dd 1943 one washed

right dds1003xx 1944 One washed

THE REAL MCCOY'S 37j

Warehouse

On 11/18/2020 at 3:54 PM, Double 0 Soul said:

I don't think so @mousemouse they would have had green stamp and a 'Devis' tab (maybe 2)

There are quite a few pairs in the Devis line up.. some with the same patch, @silencejoe knows more of their history than i do, maybe he can fill in some gaps rather than me pasting his knowledge from one forum to another

Umm the yahoo action one looks like 46s but not same as the contest pair.

The 47s Looks like this one

https://www.google.com/amp/s/gamp.ameblo.jp/atoz21/entry-10783451887.html

 

and I got the contest pair and 54 zip one

Also the color on the contest 46s looks like warehouse deadstock blue, i will try to compare it when i got the warehouse deadstock blue

11 minutes ago, Flash said:

@silencejoe I've seen this pair before mate and imo there not a 22 , there probably post 27 or there abouts because of the buttons 

If these were the pair that Jake's pair was based off then there was a few things missed as well . I think Jake's pair was one of the first "22 type" jeans he made ... a bit of a sample pair if you like ??? 

Thanks Flash, it is super fine for me 

On 9/22/2020 at 5:52 PM, Flash said:

Only other major mistake I see here is the wrong type of buttons being used .... and possibly they should be all yellow stitching ?? 

I have no idea why he made these early 22 repros as they just seem to be more of a general pre 36 mash up .  I know they have been made again in recent batches but as far as improving the errors I have no idea 

I think he is reference to thos one

 

https://www.instagram.com/p/B6CGI4OJXh_/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

 

9 hours ago, dudewuttheheck said:

The pictures I've seen seem to have all yellow stitching and this pair didn't. They've been sold anyway  

Well received

6 hours ago, mlwdp said:

@shredwin_206 I’ve never seen that pair before either.  I should’ve took more pictures but was in the store briefly passing through the area.  

That one i guess is the special db run from 2014

https://www.instagram.com/p/rDGoNup1tI/?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet

14 hours ago, sithiri said:

@silencejoe Saw this for preorder on Pheb a while back, but the measurements indicate these are really wide fit. How does it look in person??

Compare to mfsc size 40, the orslow is a bit bigger but still feel like regular jp size 40 jacket

 

Orslow x pheb

 

WAREHOUSE - DD-1003SXX LIMITED (1943 MODEL)

Mfsc

Warehouse

Trickers shell

Few days back

LVC menlo cossack , WH DD1003SXX 44s, ooe yofukuten two ears brand

 

Csf x threefaces, runabout

Freewheelers b-10

cushman x csf 22501xx

Year end action

WH 44s and 45s DD-1003SXX

Last one from 2019

 

WH 1880

Anyone know whats going on for the csf announcement

5 minutes ago, beautiful_FrEaK said:

Maybe it's the angle but they look kinda big 

Yes it a bit big, normally i wrar size 40 or 42

I order this csf size 46

Hot soak csf type 1

 

ssup joe measurements post soak would be great

i gonna wear it as raw for a while without water ; p

if you are true w34 . w36 is a right choice "with little room left" don't worry

finaly got some time to took pictures

 

devis 46 vs lvc 44

is sizing the reason why so many of those who initially said "yes" are sitting out?

i guess so too