Jump to content

Iron Horse

member
  • Posts

    1832
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Posts posted by Iron Horse

  1. Red Wings, around 5 years old. Only worn properly for about three as these were a bugger to break in.

     

    What was so troublesome about the RWs' breaking in?

     

    I'm just curious because I'm strongly considering the RW 9268 for my next boots, and the only RWs I've broken in were my 875s (which did take a while to become comfortable).

  2. Significant rep to the first to actually take the trip with the primary intention of jeans, holiday as an afterthought.

    I live so close to Okinawa that is actually tempting me...

  3. Hog, do the TCB's stretch much in the waist?

     

    The Pherrow's 441 (and I'd imagine all of their jeans) don't really have much stretch to them. 

     

    And some more photos of where the jeans are at the moment: 

     

    Screen%20Shot%202015-04-03%20at%209.59.2

     

    Screen%20Shot%202015-04-03%20at%2010.02.

     

    Screen%20Shot%202015-04-03%20at%2010.03.

     

    Screen%20Shot%202015-04-03%20at%2010.10.

     

    Screen%20Shot%202015-04-03%20at%2010.04.

     

    Screen%20Shot%202015-04-03%20at%2010.02.

  4. OK, here goes:

    Pherrow's 441 (sz 34), "slim taper model"

    Waist: 16.8 inches (33.6 when doubled)

    Rise: 13.1

    Upper thigh: 11

    Knee: 8.9

    Leg opening: 8.1

    I had the inseam hemmed to about a 34, down from 36.

    The waist fits me perfectly on these; when sitting, the thighs have just enough room to be comfortable. I will say, the thighs look a bit wide at times when I'm standing, which gives my legs a somewhat stubby appearance. That was somewhat rectified today when I gave the jeans a healthy double cuff, which helped them drape better.

    Pockets are small on these jeans, except for the coin pocket, which is quite wide. This is nice as I can fit my iPhone 5 in there with only a little effort.

    Deadstock Talon zipper.

    The denim on these is stubborn! I've been wearing these for months, almost every day, and whiskers are just showing; honeycombs are extremely faint. I gave them a third machine wash, and first machine dry, a couple weeks ago, and that made them pop some more. There's more vertical falling going on, which Pherrow's' denim is known for.

    I'll post photos later when there's light outside, but leave you with this for now:

    Screen%20Shot%202015-04-02%20at%2011.42.

  5. Hoggreaser: Sure, I can do a full write-up later on where my 441s stand with measurements and pics. I've been meaning to that for a while anyway ever since I gave them another wash a couple weeks ago and the denim popped again.  :ph34r:

     

    d-rew: Good choice; in retrospect I would have bought the 421s, and I have them in my queue for my next 13-ish oz jeans. Although I haven't worn the 13.75 oz denim, the 13.5 oz denim of my 441s didn't really stretch all that much. This is one reason I sold the 33s (my proper waist size) and went up to the 34s. The thighs on the 33s were too tight for me, especially while sitting, and that never really changed. If you're looking for a wider cut, there is the 500sw, which is quite nice looking. 

  6. I guess I like big-bottomed selvedges.  B)

     

    I ordered it off Rakuten; Take 5 Taipei never carries the 1947 in store for some reason. Their regular SC jeans are the 2009, Okinawa, Hawaii, and a Union Star model.

×
×
  • Create New...