Jump to content

ColdsnapBryan

member
  • Posts

    515
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ColdsnapBryan

  1. I need me a pair of those. Are they itchy?

     

    They probably shrinked some in the soak, but they will stretch out fairly close to the raw measurement. Could you do full measurements for the size 33? I'm curious. 

  2. So 5000 would be the largest cut of the anniversary 16oz organic? I am interested in a pair. Currently wearing 1947 Sugar Canes in 34, I usually like to go TTS so the waist fits nicely, but I need lots of thigh room. 

  3. Erk, it was pushed back to august first.

    And from seeing some participants joining via Instagram I reckon your friend probably can tag along for the ride.

     

    Link me to the Instagram? I need to fill out my feed with interesting stuff. 

  4. My 1947s feel a bit loose when standing, but when I sit im so glad I have that extra thigh and front rise. I'm 5'7" and will bounce between 175-200lbs and 34s work well for me.

  5. Not sure if this helps, my Iron Heart 643s in size 36 vs Sugar Cane 1947 in size 34. The shorter front rise makes the thigh feel tighter imo. 

     

    hWpOtOp.png

  6. Thats a great fit, if you went smaller that back rise would be up your arse. I know what you mean about everything being too small or big. As I near 30 I worry less of obtaining perfect fit and just focus on wearing and enjoying the garments I like.

  7. Girlfriend ripped through a crotch in a pair of Raleigh Denim in under 12 months. Sort of upset because they were $255 and not selvedge but cone denim.

    but maybe this is common in girls jeans.

  8. Anyone have a pair of Eternals 833 or 811 and can compare to sugar cane 1947 in same size? I've had the contest eternals from so long ago, I cannot remember the measurments. But I'm looking for a jean like my size 34 sugar canes that has a slightly smaller leg opening. 833 seem way to fitted for me :)

  9. Wow, not here too. Everyone these days seems to be offended just to be offended. I can not believe you guys are honestly letting something dictate what you wear. You should probably do some research on the treatment of animals in the food and leather industry. Surely you wouldn't wear alligator, snake, deer or a lot of other animal products. Because they are specifically hunted or raised for this reason..... I guess deer skin patched jeans are a no no too huh ? There is no difference between trophy hunting and killing animals for material products in my eyes...... And no, I am not a hunter.

     

    These are endangered species we are talking about though; lions, cheetahs, buffalo, and elephants. Species that are not going to be around in the very near future. When I have a piece of clothing I like to consider the history and what it stands for if anything. I'm not saying Russell as a whole is morally vacant, but I was just surprised to see that. 

     

    Didn't mean to derail the thread. Here's my contribution, Aldens Roy Boot about 4 years old and treated pretty good. 

     

    ynAaZiY.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...