KarlHavoc

Yeah those are on my list as a possibile alternative. The 50's are perfect for me but from what I understand the 1947 has a higher rise which I'm not sure I'd like. The more charcoal-ish black of the 1947 does look pretty cool.

Aww that's too bad. 50's might be my favorite pair at the moment, would love if they brought the black back some day.

Any chance they release the black 50's again some time soon? Or do you all think that was more of a one off?

I contacted Ryo at TCB and he said they're going to send me a replacement pair so it's all good 👍

I will try to get a pic but yeah they're visibly longer on one side. I always show my new jeans to my girlfriend and she never really cares or has a comment lol but even she noticed it immediately

I'm also a 34 waist like the dude above and went with the 36... honestly idk if I would have even been able to button up a 34. I agree redcast heritage's measurements listed on their site are pretty accurate. The only difference I got when measuring was the front rise was like an inch less than what they said. Here's the measurements of the pair I just received straight from TCB yesterday. I had them hem to an 82cm - Waist: 33.75" Inseam: 32.25" and 33.5" lol (see my post above) Front rise: 11.5" Back rise: 16" Thigh: 13.5" Knee: 10" Leg opening: 9.75"

.

Question for the experts: I just received my pair of 50's straight from TCB and I had them hem to 82cm. The left leg inseam hits it perfectly at 32.25 inches, but the right leg inseam is a full inch bigger, it's more like 33.5 inches. Right leg has some leg twist as well. Is this okay and something that will even itself out after a couple washes? The thing giving me pause is that they included the pieces of denim they cut off from each leg and one looks like it's cut straight across but the other one doesn't look even. Pics -