Jump to content

saffronrevolution

member
  • Posts

    240
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by saffronrevolution

  1. looking at the runway shots i was initially not impressed, but the photos bill posted above made me change my mind. this is definitely a collection that needs to be appreciated up close. yellow splatter coat might end up being a grail for me, and that fathers sweatshirt is definitely on my buy list. totally intrigued by this collection, even the weird "ugly" oversized boots

  2. shit. 1104 pages? i think i'll read the brother's K first...that book seems daunting enough haha. 

     

    IJ is very good, although i'd recommend the short story collection Oblivion as a better starting-off point for wallace (that's where i started, at least); it's sort of a taster for his writing style, but at 300 pages as opposed to a gargantuan 1100 (and IJ's really more like 1200, because the text on the pages of the endnotes is so purposefully tiny).

     

    Oblivion_Stories_book_cover.jpg

     

    personally i liked oblivion a bit more than jest. i feel like his style's more suited to short stories/novellas than monstrous every-conceivable-topic-spanning works (but thats just me).

  3. holy fuck! two of my favorite raf seasons in one post, way to go! RP2014 off to a good start

     

     

    that attachment is dope, anywhere else stock it other than that site you posted?

     

    er...not that i know of. sorry

  4. as it stands, fast fashion stores like gap, h&m, zara, uniqlo, etc cater to a low-stakes buying demographic, people who are after an element of individuality w/ their clothing, but aren't willing to drop upwards of $100 on a piece that might not mean anything to them a year (or even 6 months) from point of purchase. now take into account probably the central thesis of fast fashion: to emulate the trends relevant in high fashion, but at a much lower price point so that the average consumer will not only feel comfortable purchasing it, but come back to buy more once trends have changed. this ensures, for the consumer, a consistent offering of new things that they've maybe seen similar versions of on social media, and if the stores are to remove that element of trend-riding, as in to deny the fundamental hegemony of high fashion, it would amount to suicide for the majority of these companies. i do, however, believe, the same way if we're to tackle obesity it's gonna have to start at the level of fast food chains, if change is to occur, it's gonna begin with these stores (likely responding to some worldwide surge of demand for high-quality, unexploitative garments).

     

    i know your post wasn't just about fast fashion, and i don't necessarily disagree w/ you in that this should be changed, but my point is that there's a lot more in play right now than simple self-centeredness or laziness on the part of the consumer. greed and corruption on the part of these companies, both high fashion and fast fashion, seems to me to be the central drive for this accumulation of waste and consequently inequity for third-world countries, and people are just stuck in the mindset promulgated by those stores.

     

    another slant (which i don't necessarily agree with) is that this exploitative manufacturing is somehow a tool for transforming these third-world countries into states with higher standards of living. like it happened with japan and korea, and its currently happening (albeit slowly) with china and indonesia. but can it happen for countries like vietnam and bangladesh, whose current standards of living are literally so low that any manufacturing boom that occurs there is just to offset the probability of a complete and total economic disaster? and i really dont know the answer to that (maybe someone's got data). sorry this turned into such a long-winded post

×
×
  • Create New...