case87

^^ are those the sebagos? if so, might as well, they're pretty cheap. obviously depends on your style but i like them for what they are.

what are these? rafs? thanks.

edit: i'm dumb - no metal eyelets no raf on the tag. turns out they're these... http://www.drmartens.com/ProductDetail.asp?PID=13254201

anyone else selling these online in this or other colorways? size 7 / 8 or so

http://store.nike.com/us/en_us/?sitesrc=uslp=#l=shop,pdp,ctr-inline/cid-100701/pid-386538/pgid-394702

looks like 8 is the smallest they got tho. garnet and spice are both dope. tres bien pics always make shit look so much better...

^used to run ripped dvds (video_ts folders) on the built in dvd player from my old wd (passport?) to my ibook g4 with no problems, so you should be fine.

I'm resorting to pictures.

before i say anything let me clarify i'm not tryna be all like "fuck you it doesnt need flash," just pointing some things out.

video sites like hulu would probably cannibalize [edit: sorry, not the right word for this, but you know what i mean] apples itunes sales, so it makes a certain amount of sense. many sites (like cnn/google finance) that use flash will have dedicated apps that work better than the webpage would have anyway. same goes for games. bang bros... well... fair enough.

point being, i personally don't see the no-flash issue as a drawback (for what my use would be). that being said, 4.0 should include a flash optional feature in which the user can choose to enable flash, have "touch to flash" (like click to flash) or disable it. fuck, apple can put some text by the menu saying they recommend not using it because of performance issues.

but i can definitely see your point that the web without flash is not the full experience (even if you don't like flash).

in this guys defense... his name is

husjA7bfmug

^ those could be good. def not terrible.

simple y/n

is cheeap as balls (like $35). would replace band with black nato...

If you got it you know what this is... the one with four diagonal zippers. Would prefer black, but get at me if you have either color in small (US size) and want to sell. Thanks.

just so they're all here... (just outerwear)

im with billy in that i love those sperrys but with gbc in that i dont like the laces (on those). and btw gbc, those are the nubuck ones.

flock (or anyone else), you know when those tectuff docs drop?

^^ Audemars Piguet

trying to learn the basics of inkscape & gimp. thoughts?

mharcl:

http://www.zappos.com/n/p/dp/58686025/c/157163.html

(note sperry logo on tongue)

and mass:

you're amazing. btw, where to get good sushi in the h? only place i know is kubo's...

fuck when does oc end? and is it in LA too?

i'm stupid, to answer my own question for anyone else who might be wondering: yes it is in LA too

s2a taralis is dope... wish it were smaller

can anyone think of anything that looks remotely like the cloak fw04 flight vest (that would be cheaper)? obviously i do not expect details to be that close but anything even a little similar would be appreciated. thx

oh, also, what season is this margiela jacket? i think e0dn09nb had/has it...

last few days:

funny people,

what next out out:

beauty and the beast

grand illusion

knife int he water

lord of the flies

rashomon

wild strawberries (criterion box set concept)

if they made a movie of pattern recognition who would/should play cayce_p? and bigend. and you can't say tom cruise for bigend.

the only 2 legitimate non juicers in my mind are griffey and the big hurt

both are tight but you forgettin that hometown boy lance b. too fat for roids concept. would say bagwell, but... well....

wheelsx - pretty sure those are t000s... someone correct me if i'm wrong

bradpitt (or anyone else in ny) - what new colors? do they still have the dark grey?

^ this b true, but not as bad as that belt. wow. junya looks incredibly dope. fit pics?? also i like the (presumably) toj sketches goin on next to the ann d

yes, they will.

Honest Question: does that site Just Jared send people to fashion fora to ask questions just to post pictures with the site watermark?

if so it doesnt work, cause i just looked at the pic long enough to see the jeans sucked and the dude was fat. did not even notice watermark. oh yeah, also (@jeanz looking good)...